Not sure we can win this. If the Council lose track of the kids they are at fault, yet if the lock them up in accommodation they are at fault for presumably false imprisonment. We really do know how to phuck up our civilisation.

hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Whether you believe me or not, and it's pretty nailed on that you wouldn't believe me if I said the sun will rise tomorrow, the transcripts alone are enough.

Whenever I think the bottom of the garbage barrel has been scraped clean I read something like "the system is anti-white and fetishizes the 'other'" and realise I was wrong!

Note the use, once again" of American spelling and ponder where this piece of ridiculousness was born. Each concept is simply wrong.

What happened with Lady Hussey is unconnected to her, or Ms Fulani's skin tone, appearance or involvement with a charity with an objective. What was said would have been just as objectionable if Ms Fulani had said similar things to Lady Hussey, and of the idea of the "system being anti-white".

It's the idea that such things matter which is the issue. Some people genuinely just don't understand that, which is very sad. Hopefully this will be the last generation where such ideas remain in some minds.

At least Lady Hussey had the grace and humility to admit her mistake, apologise and do the honourable thing. Unfortunately that level of dignity is not possessed by all.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I have explained what the transcript was. This is a set up end of. Ms Headley should not been known as Fulani, unless TR can be known as Tommy Robinson.
This won’t be the last generation, as history is always there

That's fair enough. My mistake. It may well have been a set up and, if so, deserves condemnation.

That though is a separate issue. This issue is what was actually said and not if the saying was induced.

The transcript has not been challenged by anyone, and is, so far as I can recall, accurate. Remember, I have heard the conversation and the tone employed, which cannot be found in the written word.

Future generations will view history with different eyes to our own. They always do. We wonder why slavery was considered acceptable, or women denied the vote. This will be no different.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (03 Dec 2022 7.24pm)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Which confirms what I heard myself and isn't challenged by anyone else who heard it.

So it ought to be regarded by everyone as correct and not doubted just because it doesn't suit a particular agenda.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

So one persons version should be taken as gospel? Even iIf that person has an agenda? What you heard was not a recording of any conversation, just one version. Are you saying this is acceptable in any scenario?