You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 4 2026 1.46am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)


Page 109 of 261 < 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 >
Midlands Eagle Flag 24 Nov 22 2.20pm

Originally posted by nhp61


Is it possible that they interviewed a larger number of people and chose to only show those that showed support of the strike?

Have you never noticed that when the BBC interview the man (or woman) in the street they always seem to aim for the most stupid looking ones

 

Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 24 Nov 22 2.27pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Have you never noticed that when the BBC interview the man (or woman) in the street they always seem to aim for the most stupid looking ones

I heard they used to linger outside the backdoor for the Jeremy Kyle show.

Unfortunately could just be the average representation for people in street however.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 24 Nov 22 2.35pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Have you never noticed that when the BBC interview the man (or woman) in the street they always seem to aim for the most stupid looking ones

I've noticed this as well but by pollsters. Amnesty international, Planned Parenthood Etc always seem to target youngsters nearly always sporting piercings & multiple hair colouring

 


Pro USA & Israel

cryrst Flag The garden of England 24 Nov 22 5.20pm

Originally posted by Jimenez

I've noticed this as well but by pollsters. Amnesty international, Planned Parenthood Etc always seem to target youngsters nearly always sporting piercings & multiple hair colouring

Antifa light

 

YT Flag Oxford 25 Nov 22 12.02pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Have you never noticed that when the BBC interview the man (or woman) in the street they always seem to aim for the most stupid looking ones

Yes, and they never challenge any of their comments. Yesterday, for example, a whole string of people in some high street in England all saying that nurses should be paid a lot more. Not one challenge such as "how much should they be paid?" or "how would that be funded?" or "would you be happy to pay a couple of hundred more in tax a month to make it happen, then a couple of hundred more for the train drivers, teachers etc etc?"

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

YT Flag Oxford 25 Nov 22 12.08pm

And another thing....

In its World Cup coverage, why does the BBC show bias towards one team in its choice of pundits? Today for example, 2 former Wales players and a Welsh presenter plus a German. No Iranian.

Belgium v Canada - a Belgian (V Kompany), no Canadian
Brazil v Serbia - a Brazilian, no Serbian

etc

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 25 Nov 22 1.00pm

Originally posted by YT

Yes, and they never challenge any of their comments. Yesterday, for example, a whole string of people in some high street in England all saying that nurses should be paid a lot more. Not one challenge such as "how much should they be paid?" or "how would that be funded?" or "would you be happy to pay a couple of hundred more in tax a month to make it happen, then a couple of hundred more for the train drivers, teachers etc etc?"

Or they could ask if people want their kids taught by monkeys or by professionals? Or if the train companies could have used profits to pay workers, instead of paying dividends? Or if they could sack a whole layer of management in the NHS and no one would notice? It goes both ways - they're not quite on the side you may think. They still need the licence fee.

 


Red and Blue Army!

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 25 Nov 22 1.02pm

Originally posted by YT

And another thing....

In its World Cup coverage, why does the BBC show bias towards one team in its choice of pundits? Today for example, 2 former Wales players and a Welsh presenter plus a German. No Iranian.

Belgium v Canada - a Belgian (V Kompany), no Canadian
Brazil v Serbia - a Brazilian, no Serbian

etc

It annoys me when they're only balanced for the England games. No doubt Megan Rapinhoe tonight on duty for the England game.

 


Red and Blue Army!

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 25 Nov 22 1.21pm

Originally posted by YT

And another thing....

In its World Cup coverage, why does the BBC show bias towards one team in its choice of pundits? Today for example, 2 former Wales players and a Welsh presenter plus a German. No Iranian.

Belgium v Canada - a Belgian (V Kompany), no Canadian
Brazil v Serbia - a Brazilian, no Serbian

etc

the Serbia team are mostly straight white men. That's like Kryptonite to the BBC. Probably something similar with Canada and so Vincent Kompany was more acceptable.

And if the Poland team starts winning all their games ? just watch the BBC clambering around to find a female LGBT pundit from Krakow.

its amazing how our license fee is paying for an overtly racist/misanthropist organisation.


Edited by PalazioVecchio (25 Nov 2022 1.23pm)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

YT Flag Oxford 25 Nov 22 2.02pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Or they could ask if people want their kids taught by monkeys or by professionals? Or if the train companies could have used profits to pay workers, instead of paying dividends? Or if they could sack a whole layer of management in the NHS and no one would notice? It goes both ways - they're not quite on the side you may think. They still need the licence fee.

Indeed. My point, of course, was to agree with Midlands in saying that they always ask the thickest looking people they can find, and then to point out that they ask a hopelessly one-dimensional question.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

YT Flag Oxford 25 Nov 22 2.04pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

It annoys me when they're only balanced for the England games. No doubt Megan Rapinhoe tonight on duty for the England game.

Is she the straight one?

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 25 Nov 22 2.27pm

Originally posted by YT

Is she the straight one?

The least straight one.

 


Red and Blue Army!

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 25 Nov 22 4.47pm

Originally posted by YT

they always ask the thickest looking people they can find, and then to point out that they ask a hopelessly one-dimensional question.

the thicks from the bbc will interview the thicks in the street ?

birds of a feather....

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 25 Nov 22 4.58pm

I have to think I probably look a bit thick. Probably totally thick. I know someone is thinking of a reply right now.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 27 Nov 22 8.11am

Apparently BBC staff are demanding an inquiry into racism at the corporation.

[Link]

Odd that such a left wing organisation is beset with discrimination claims on such a regular basis.

 


One more point

Stirlingsays Flag 27 Nov 22 8.35am

Originally posted by Badger11

Apparently BBC staff are demanding an inquiry into racism at the corporation.

[Link]

Odd that such a left wing organisation is beset with discrimination claims on such a regular basis.

Progressivism has a strong taste of the Salem witch trials about it.

As in that case, the madness never truly ends until the powerful get affected. It serves a useful purpose until eyes are directed at them.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 27 Nov 22 9.46am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Progressivism has a strong taste of the Salem witch trials about it.

As in that case, the madness never truly ends until the powerful get affected. It serves a useful purpose until eyes are directed at them.

I do not believe the BBC is anything like what these complainers say it is. However it is an open door with deep pockets so these people smell money / jobs and promotion.

There was a TV presenter who complained about pay discrimination and got a huge pay out. It went something like this:

Presenter I have never heard of who hosted a show I never heard of in the early mornings (circa 6am) when nobody is watching wins claims against BBC because another presenter I have never heard of who also presented a show I had never heard of which nobody watches was paid more than her.

Where the BBC is at fault is that he has allowed too many staff to claim that they are exceptional and so should be paid outside of the pay structure. This has then lead to a free for all where people are paid based on how good their agent is.

In the example above what the BBC should have done is told these people that they are not stars and plenty of people can do their job so they will be paid within the salary structure.

There are probably only a handful of people that actually are big enough to circumvent the pay structure.

 


One more point

Midlands Eagle Flag 27 Nov 22 11.30am

Originally posted by YT

they never challenge any of their comments. Yesterday, for example, a whole string of people in some high street in England all saying that nurses should be paid a lot more. Not one challenge such as "how much should they be paid?" or "how would that be funded?"

A couple of days ago the Beeb had an interview with a nurse on their website saying that he was happy to go on strike as the pay was far too low. Apparently he had been a nurse for just one year but the Beeb never commented on the fact that he had obviously entered the profession knowing that pay levels were low for newly qualified nurses

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 27 Nov 22 12.31pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Progressivism has a strong taste of the Salem witch trials about it.

As in that case, the madness never truly ends until the powerful get affected. It serves a useful purpose until eyes are directed at them.

Not suggesting a bromance here but I agree this post entirely.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 27 Nov 22 12.37pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Progressivism has a strong taste of the Salem witch trials about it.

As in that case, the madness never truly ends until the powerful get affected. It serves a useful purpose until eyes are directed at them.

Agreed. All those trendy woke warriors of today perhaps in 30 years time will find themselves on the wrong end of the argument and shamed and scorned by the youth of the future.

I must admit to an element of schadenfreude when I see some feminists de platformed and derided by people using the same tactics that those feminists used in the past against the male pale and the stale.

They rightly complain, but in some cases they are getting a taste of their own medicine.


Edited by Badger11 (27 Nov 2022 12.39pm)

 


One more point

Page 109 of 261 < 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)