You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 4 2026 4.05am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)


Page 118 of 261 < 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 >
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 10 Mar 23 5.37pm

As a personal protest I will not watch MOTD tomorrow evening, that will really shake the BBC.

Unless Palace beat Man City of course.

Looks like I had better find something else to do.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 10 Mar 23 5.37pm

Originally posted by Nicholas91

Gary Lineker to step back from presenting MOTD [Link]

And Wrighty protesting on his behalf.

Wright was a hero in his Palace days, but he has turned into another deluded whiner.

 

nhp61 Flag Goring-By-Sea born, now in Brackne... 10 Mar 23 5.45pm

Ian Wright is stepping down from Match of the Day in "solidarity" with Lineker.

As already mentioned, it'll probably be Alex Scott appearing on the show. She's another virtue signaller. At the World Cup she smugly wore the rainbow armband after the captains of various teams were banned from wearing them.

 

Wilesy01 Flag Bristol 10 Mar 23 5.50pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

And Wrighty protesting on his behalf.

Wright was a hero in his Palace days, but he has turned into another deluded whiner.

Well done Wrighty standing up for free speech

Shame you're not a fan of libertarian views Hrolf!

 

Matov Flag 10 Mar 23 6.00pm

It is just froth. As a career move, probably ideal for him and part of me does wonder if he maybe engineered this by way of the publicity?

Never quite understood why he justified the salary he did but that could be sent with entire swathes of people employed by the BBC.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Mar 23 6.14pm

Remember, the BBC and it’s Tory donor chairman who facilitated a loan to the then prime minister without disclosing it, are definitely biased against the right.

Regardless of your politics, the government pressuring the state broadcaster to silence a voice because they are critical of government policy should be a major concern.

 

Teddy Eagle Flag 10 Mar 23 6.14pm

Originally posted by nhp61

Ian Wright is stepping down from Match of the Day in "solidarity" with Lineker.

As already mentioned, it'll probably be Alex Scott appearing on the show. She's another virtue signaller. At the World Cup she smugly wore the rainbow armband after the captains of various teams were banned from wearing them.

Isn't Wrighty just going to miss tomorrow's programme? Oh, well, Arsenal aren't playing so he won't miss much.

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Mar 23 6.18pm

Originally posted by nhp61

Ian Wright is stepping down from Match of the Day in "solidarity" with Lineker.

As already mentioned, it'll probably be Alex Scott appearing on the show. She's another virtue signaller. At the World Cup she smugly wore the rainbow armband after the captains of various teams were banned from wearing them.

A lesbian protesting against homophobia in a country with discriminatory laws = virtue signalling.

Strong logic.

I expect we’ll see plenty more pundits and presenters refusing the gig.

Maybe this is the opportunity Le Tissier has been waiting for.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 10 Mar 23 6.23pm

Originally posted by Wilesy01

Well done Wrighty standing up for free speech

Shame you're not a fan of libertarian views Hrolf!

Oh, I am.

It's the laughable double standards that amuse me.
The same people, your like minds, who want to shut down all opposing views are now bleating about Lineker being shut down.

It's just comedy gold.

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 10 Mar 23 6.27pm

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

A lesbian protesting against homophobia in a country with discriminatory laws = virtue signalling.

Strong logic.

I expect we’ll see plenty more pundits and presenters refusing the gig.

Maybe this is the opportunity Le Tissier has been waiting for.

However Ms Scott did actually travel to Qatar and basically took money promoting the WC. Surely a total boycott of the country would have been better? Perhaps money talks.
By the way I am a big fan of Alex Scott as a presenter

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Mar 23 6.28pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Oh, I am.

It's the laughable double standards that amuse me.
The same people, your like minds, who want to shut down all opposing views are now bleating about Lineker being shut down.

It's just comedy gold.

And the same people who deplore ‘cancel culture’ are celebrating this as a win.

The real double standards would be if say, Alan Sugar was tweeting against Corbyn and Mick Lynch and faced absolutely no consequences, but someone who works for the same employer is critical of government policy and is treated differently. We could all agree that’s a double standard.

But remember, the BBC hate the right.

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 10 Mar 23 6.30pm

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Remember, the BBC and it’s Tory donor chairman who facilitated a loan to the then prime minister without disclosing it, are definitely biased against the right.

Regardless of your politics, the government pressuring the state broadcaster to silence a voice because they are critical of government policy should be a major concern.

Would they have silenced someone who disagreed with the Trans movement? I suspect so.
As the BBC is impartial ( ha ha) they cannot be seen to be allowing an employee to be so politically biased

 

Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 10 Mar 23 6.31pm

Originally posted by Wilesy01

Well done Wrighty standing up for free speech

Shame you're not a fan of libertarian views Hrolf!

I tend to agree but I wonder if Gary’s problem was relating his comments to the Nazi period. If he’d just said he didn’t agree with what the Government were proposing without reference to anything in history, perhaps the issue would never have arisen. Likewise, Clarkson got pilloried for his comments, so what’s the difference and are they being treated equally?

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Mar 23 6.45pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

As a personal protest I will not watch MOTD tomorrow evening, that will really shake the BBC.

Unless Palace beat Man City of course.

Looks like I had better find something else to do.

I'm getting blind drunk and watching the rugby. No doubt, I'll see the Palace score at some stage.

 


Red and Blue Army!

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 10 Mar 23 6.47pm

Shearer pulled out as well.

Gary Lineker has made the wrong analogy to Germany in the 1930's.

But we must not censor people in this way, it is shameful of the BBC.

If anything, they are making his case.

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Mar 23 6.57pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Would they have silenced someone who disagreed with the Trans movement? I suspect so.
As the BBC is impartial ( ha ha) they cannot be seen to be allowing an employee to be so politically biased

And yet this was fine?

66776FBD-8237-4791-A78F-CF1335017348.jpeg Attachment: 66776FBD-8237-4791-A78F-CF1335017348.jpeg (81.04Kb)

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Mar 23 7.01pm

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

I tend to agree but I wonder if Gary’s problem was relating his comments to the Nazi period. If he’d just said he didn’t agree with what the Government were proposing without reference to anything in history, perhaps the issue would never have arisen. Likewise, Clarkson got pilloried for his comments, so what’s the difference and are they being treated equally?

If Lineker had said he dreamt of seeing Braverman made to parade naked through the streets to shouts of ‘shame!’ then they could be seen as equivalent comments.

Clarkson is a good example though - I think he had a weekly newspaper column whilst he was hosting Top Gear - no issues with anything he ever said. Amazing.

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 10 Mar 23 7.01pm

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

And yet this was fine?

I cannot abide Sugar, but no mention of Nazis, Linekar has had several warnings.

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Mar 23 7.04pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

I cannot abide Sugar, but no mention of Nazis, Linekar has had several warnings.

That’s moving the goalposts - you said “ As the BBC is impartial ( ha ha) they cannot be seen to be allowing an employee to be so politically biased”

I’m providing a clear example of an employee doing exactly that (of which there are many) and now it’s not about being politically biased, just that they have to mention Nazis?


 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 10 Mar 23 7.05pm

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

If Lineker had said he dreamt of seeing Braverman made to parade naked through the streets to shouts of ‘shame!’ then they could be seen as equivalent comments.

Clarkson is a good example though - I think he had a weekly newspaper column whilst he was hosting Top Gear - no issues with anything he ever said. Amazing.

Has Clarkson not lost his TV shows? Another person I cannot stand but he did apologise. Linekar has not had the decency to do this, the mention of Nazis leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. My Grandfathers family were Jewish, I will say no more

 

Page 118 of 261 < 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)