You and your ilk are continually speaking like remaining is a done deal. It's bizarre. If we leave with some form of deal, we've left. End of.

You lot can then fight over what you meant by leaving but that is for the birds. We will still have left.

Don't throw your toys out of the pram simply because you won't be getting your version of 'leave'. That was never specified, and anyone who claims it meant this or that is simply making it up to suit their own position.

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

What on earth are you talking about?

Referendums have never had any legal standpoint in the UK system.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Utter, utter nonsense. BJ and Rees-Mogg were both Tory rebels themselves when May was trying to pass her deal, and they both voted against it more than once; why were they not expelled?
They have both voted against the party position numerous times throughout their career.

Some of these 21 who expelled voted in favour of May’s deal, so this notion that they’re anti-democratic, and trying to subvert Brexit is just more nonsense.

I find it beyond parody for someone to sit there calling MPs self-serving, back-stabbing, lying and spoilt whilst throwing their support behind Boris f***in Johnson.

If you don't trust experts then more fool you.

I tend to believe people I know have more knowledge than I do on specific subjects.

That's why I consult a doctor rather than a plumber if I have a medical issue and a plumber rather than a doctor if my pipes burst.

Whilst not every doctor will agree on the best course of action there is usually a consensus. It's no different with the impact of a no deal Brexit. The overwhelming opinion of the experts is that it will cause long term damage so should be avoided if at all possible.

Playing who blinks first on the edge of the cliff is not wise politics.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

In the case of Brexit there are experts on both sides so I guess that you only follow those experts that agree with you

You are obviously following different experts to me as none of the opinions that I have seen state that there will be long term damage unless there is no intention of trying to forge a trading arrangement

Unlike you to laud Tony Blair's government Danny.

But they rebelled regarding something that basically has killed any chance of the UK getting a better withdrawal than the one repeatedly rejected by Parliament. Boris Johnson was absolutely spot on with his tactics with the EU who were starting to believe that he would carry No Deal through. It was music to my ears as a leaver. This deserved the support of Parliament irrespective of their personal views on BJ. If not all then at least including the rebels plus those who were prepared to put this fine Country first before politics.
BJ quite rightly is prepared to be led around Brussels like some poodle and with it the UK being further laughed at.
I will repeat once again that the views and votes of the 17.4million who voted leave have not been given priority. This could well lead to civil unrest and if so the MP’s should have a serious look at themselves. SHOULD HAVE BACKED YOUR PM.
As for the rebels go and find another party in fact to be specific the LibDems as they wish to block Brexit.
Taking No Deal off the table merely prolongs the uncertainty and with it suffering of many businesses.
Finally, it would have been LEAVING the EU with no deal and NOT ‘crashing’. Just thought it worth clarifying.

Bring back Brolin

I don't recall there being any overwhelming expert opinion on that subject.

It was a political judgement.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Even those in favour suggest that it could be 30 years before the damage is repaired.

With the pace of change 30 years is several lifetimes, so really long term.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Based of BoJo's own words I just can't imagine him asking the EU for an extension. But at the same time, there is likely to be an election in November now I'd say, and I doubt he'd want to step down when potentially it could result in him being prime minister for 5 years. A tricky situation. Three years plus in, and the next twist and turn still remains an unknown.