This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Nonsense the Lisbon Treaty has already been in operation 12 years, started in 2009. This we know but from your post you just have NOT read and digested the whole thing. The Lisbon treaty has been pushed to the background and forgotten by many.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
He's intellectually honest, whether we agree with him or not, and personally I think that's something to value on here. For me the economic argument, even if we agreed with SW19 about cheap labour, it just isn't anywhere near enough to remain in this form of EU. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2019 4.11pm) You're right. Honesty is a good thing and I respect him for it. I also like the way he is not trying to be virtuous like many remainers do. I would argue though that over supply of labour and wage deflation causes poverty, irrespective of where the supply is coming from. Particularly due to the knock on effect it has on infrastructure and service which as a nation we are really slow to react too and almost never proactive over. It's certainly not worth remaining in the EU to suppress wages. If we wanted cheap labour, then there are plenty of other nations in the world where we could get it far cheaper.
|
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
This we know but from your post you just have NOT read and digested the whole thing. The Lisbon treaty has been pushed to the background and forgotten by many. The Hong Kong Exchange has bid for the LSE.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
You're right. Honesty is a good thing and I respect him for it. I also like the way he is not trying to be virtuous like many remainers do. I would argue though that over supply of labour and wage deflation causes poverty, irrespective of where the supply is coming from. Particularly due to the knock on effect it has on infrastructure and service which as a nation we are really slow to react too and almost never proactive over. It's certainly not worth remaining in the EU to suppress wages. If we wanted cheap labour, then there are plenty of other nations in the world where we could get it far cheaper. I agree. SW19 recognises that remaining on this course is a problem in of itself as we move forward with increasing automation. Blocking entry is far easier than deporting people....I think the last few generations of politicians have been so obsessed with short termism that the problems they have mounted up are huge.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by susmik
I read the Lisbon Treaty last night Check it out if you wish ——>> LISBON TREATY
This is the future that the youths of today think we stole from them? The choice is yours.......... What seems most interesting about this is that whilst the EU presents itself as liberal organisation, and freedom of movement is a free market policy, some of its other policies appear to be a totalitarian power grab, by moving finance centres to Frankfurt they are really controlling the economy and limiting where people can live or what industry they work in.
|
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
This we know but from your post you just have NOT read and digested the whole thing. The Lisbon treaty has been pushed to the background and forgotten by many.
The Lisbon treaty and it's implications have been in effect for some time. They are nothing like those you suggest. For an objective summary read this:- Key paragraphs from that summary:- "The Treaty introduces a new system of qualified majority voting which will take effect from November 2004 and is aimed at achieving a balance between large and small Member States. Under the new system a measure will be approved if it is supported by 55% of the Member States (15 out of 27), provided they represent 65% of the EU population. Only the most sensitive areas, such as tax, social security, citizens' rights, languages, seats of the institutions and common foreign, security and defence policies, remain subject to unanimity voting."
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
I read the Lisbon Treaty last night Check it out if you wish ——>> LISBON TREATY
This is the future that the youths of today think we stole from them? The choice is yours.......... The scary thing is people actually believe this s***e.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
The scary thing is people actually believe this s***e. It's all true....eventually.....if the EU project continues and the UK don't leave. Tell me what is in there that won't eventually happen if the UK doesn't leave the EU.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Tell me which part is wrong. Well you didn't properly engage or actually read both my posts. You read: I am a remainer BLAH BLAH BLAH only solution BLAH BLAH BLAH another referendum. In essence that is what I said. But only because I struggle to think of another way to resolve this and allow the govermment to govern. You have probably said so in this rather long thread in amongst the cantankerous bilious insults but what workable solution do you propose? Give me your thoughts and perhaps we can discuss this intelligently as I am capable of persuasion. Hint; we won in 2016 get over it is not a workable way out of this an nor is just leave without a deal as it will be impossible to get that past parliament. I'm listening...
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's all true....eventually.....if the EU project continues and the UK don't leave. Tell me what is in there that won't eventually happen if the UK doesn't leave the EU. The funniest one is losing the rebate. There is always some excuse about the rebate. It's like lending a tenner to a gambling addict.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's all true....eventually.....if the EU project continues and the UK don't leave. Tell me what is in there that won't eventually happen if the UK doesn't leave the EU. It’s true that all of those things listed are stated in the Lisbon Treaty, and we’re powerless to resist? Get real.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I decided to research if a member state could get kicked out of the EU. Basically they can't. From the Garden of Eden (The EU) to being acquired by Trump.
|
|
|
You can never have enough golf courses.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
Well you didn't properly engage or actually read both my posts. You read: I am a remainer BLAH BLAH BLAH only solution BLAH BLAH BLAH another referendum. In essence that is what I said. But only because I struggle to think of another way to resolve this and allow the govermment to govern. You have probably said so in this rather long thread in amongst the cantankerous bilious insults but what workable solution do you propose? Give me your thoughts and perhaps we can discuss this intelligently as I am capable of persuasion. Hint; we won in 2016 get over it is not a workable way out of this an nor is just leave without a deal as it will be impossible to get that past parliament. I'm listening... You make it sound like Labour Remainers have no will of their own. Yes we voted to leave in 2016 and nothing has changed. The people have spoken and Parliament must deliver no matter what.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The Lisbon treaty and it's implications have been in effect for some time. They are nothing like those you suggest. For an objective summary read this:- Key paragraphs from that summary:- "The Treaty introduces a new system of qualified majority voting which will take effect from November 2004 and is aimed at achieving a balance between large and small Member States. Under the new system a measure will be approved if it is supported by 55% of the Member States (15 out of 27), provided they represent 65% of the EU population. Only the most sensitive areas, such as tax, social security, citizens' rights, languages, seats of the institutions and common foreign, security and defence policies, remain subject to unanimity voting." You are wrong on that one sunshine. As ALWAYS you come out with a load of bull$hit just to satisfy your one sided view. It is quite obvious you have scoured the net for some text to copy and paste yourself just to prove your point.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
It’s true that all of those things listed are stated in the Lisbon Treaty, and we’re powerless to resist? Get real. Well I didn't mention the Lisbon Treaty.....As far as I'm concerned each treaty since Maastricht has seen unacceptable sovereign powers given away to foreign bodies without the mandate of the public. The relevant point is that everything there certainly will happen if we don't leave.....What difference does it make which treaty includes what? Like arguing over which log goes into the fire first.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You make it sound like Labour Remainers have no will of their own. Yes we voted to leave in 2016 and nothing has changed. The people have spoken and Parliament must deliver no matter what. Yes you refer to realpolitik which is a bitch. So within that irritating factual matrix what do you suggest?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Yes we voted to leave in 2016 and nothing has changed. The people have spoken and Parliament must deliver no matter what. The 2016 'remain' campaign made huge and inaccurate predictions about what would happen to the economy if we voted leave....in plenty of cases directly after the vote. Yet, the economy has actually improved since that vote....wages went up.....those so called 'experts' are examples of much of what we know about 'predictions'....that experts are often little better than fifty fifty. So I'm going to predict....probably with the same level of chance. While I personally believe that there will be a cost to leaving I'm confident that long term it's the better economic position.....because I have about as much faith in the EU as I have in most left wing institutions run by the continent. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2019 9.17pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
The funniest one is losing the rebate. There is always some excuse about the rebate. It's like lending a tenner to a gambling addict. Nice analogy.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.