This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by susmik
I am afraid that Wisbech Eagle always posts shyte and you wont stop him I am afraid. I have given up trying to debate with him as he will always twist things around to suit his point of view.
When challenged to provide evidence your silence spoke volumes. People are free to draw their own conclusions. I have mine.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by dollardays
Latest Westminster voting intention (YOUGOV - 9-10 Sep)
When you look at that you think with a con-Brexit pact they’ll breeze home. But the snp will dominate Scotland and the Lib Dem’s will pick up some seats with a clear policy on Brexit. There won’t be a majority and this will go on for another thousand or 3 or 4 pages.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
When challenged to provide evidence your silence spoke volumes. The evidence is within treaty itself which you have admitted you could not be arsed to read.....END OF !!
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
The evidence is within treaty itself which you have admitted you could not be arsed to read.....END OF !! No it isn't. I doubt anyone other than the drafters have actually read the whole treaty. Including you! Like everyone I read the detailed summary of it's provisions and not the convoluted legal language and cross referencing of the treaty itself I have challenged you to show us all where it says anything even remotely resembling the fantasies you claimed. You have failed to do so. If it's there show us where. That's such a glorious opportunity to prove me wrong that if you fail to take it up it can only be because it doesn't exist. You claim to be the expert so now prove it.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No it isn't. I doubt anyone other than the drafters have actually read the whole treaty. Including you! Like everyone I read the detailed summary of it's provisions and not the convoluted legal language and cross referencing of the treaty itself I have challenged you to show us all where it says anything even remotely resembling the fantasies you claimed. You have failed to do so. If it's there show us where. That's such a glorious opportunity to prove me wrong that if you fail to take it up it can only be because it doesn't exist. You claim to be the expert so now prove it. Ohh someones getting rattled!!
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The truth about brexit is that thee are no benefits whatsoever. Johnson, who was originally against brexit, saw his route to power and unlimited wealth. What an opportunity, and he and his backers will become filthy rich. Brexiteers are real suckers. Democracy? We won't bother with that. My brilliant post page 2092 re-printed. Why buy Cameron's book when it is here for you free of all charges and EU tariffs.......
Surprisingly though the Sunday Times is actually read rather more than the HOL so probably has more impact. Especially as the right leaning majority here have very fixed opinions. I haven't yet read the Sunday Times piece. Only the summaries of what's there but it seems pretty damning to me. What Cameron says has that ring of truth we can all see when things are so obviously true they cannot be denied. He is saying nothing that wasn't clearly apparent during the referendum campaign but were dismissed then as just "election" posturing when in fact they are much more important than that. The accusation is that Johnson is a sham who is putting his own ambition before the interests of the country.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No it isn't. I doubt anyone other than the drafters have actually read the whole treaty. Including you! Like everyone I read the detailed summary of it's provisions and not the convoluted legal language and cross referencing of the treaty itself I have challenged you to show us all where it says anything even remotely resembling the fantasies you claimed. You have failed to do so. If it's there show us where. That's such a glorious opportunity to prove me wrong that if you fail to take it up it can only be because it doesn't exist. You claim to be the expert so now prove it. I do not claim to an expert but I do claim to be able to read even if you cannot or will not. Also I do not need to prove anything to a person like you that is so argumentative and really such an unintelligent human being. I am not alone in my opinion of you as many other people on this thread and other threads have mentioned !!
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Ohh someones getting rattled!! Maybe, but not me. A poster made a claim he is unable to back up. That's disingenuous at best. The only support from elsewhere being some spurious idea that never mind whether any of it is actually true and written into the treaties it is going to all happen by default anyway if we stay in the EU. Which is about as daft a concept as you can get. The UK is a sovereign state and as the EU requires total unanimity on every important issue we have the complete authority to reject any proposal which doesn't suit us. So none of the suggested things are going to happen unless our Parliament agrees to them and they won't. Unless it becomes the, very unlikely, case that it is
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
I do not claim to an expert but I do claim to be able to read even if you cannot or will not. Also I do not need to prove anything to a person like you that is so argumentative and really such an unintelligent human being. I am not alone in my opinion of you as many other people on this thread and other threads have mentioned !!
Now either stop digging your hole and climb the ladder I have put in for you or admit you are unable to do so. It's up to you to prove your claim, and not up to me.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Now either stop digging your hole and climb the ladder I have put in for you or admit you are unable to do so. It's up to you to prove your claim, and not up to me. It seems that Stirlingsays has got it ...why cannot you?????
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
It seems that Stirlingsays has got it ...why cannot you????? No he hasn't! Even he is not suggesting that the Lisbon Treaty provides for the things you suggest. He is saying that if we stay in the EU then eventually those things would all come to pass anyway, whatever the Treaties say. Which is a very different argument. Equally as wrong by the way but still different. So sorry, but it seems you are alone on this. Now let's have the references as to where in the Lisbon Treaty, that you have read in it's entirety, does it state the things you claim it says.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
How is it wrong? The result of EU treaties has seen the gradual transfer of sovereignty. Staying in the EU would only see this increase. Unless we leave, this can't be reversed short of violent revolution. Stop lying to people. Its no good trying to reason with this overage schoolboy Stirling . He only sees things his way and all of our points of views etc are beyond his understanding or comprehension. We are flogging a dead horse in his case. I shall not respond to his childish un educational posts anymore no matter what he comes up with. He is totally wasted space I am afraid.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
|
Civil disobedience if the powers that be betray Brexit.
Big up the Palace!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
Its no good trying to reason with this overage schoolboy Stirling . He only sees things his way and all of our points of views etc are beyond his understanding or comprehension. We are flogging a dead horse in his case. I shall not respond to his childish un educational posts anymore no matter what he comes up with. He is totally wasted space I am afraid. You are of course correct.....it's a waste of time debating with him as he's fundamentally dishonest.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by SpyroCrystal
Civil disobedience if the powers that be betray Brexit. Indeed, if we don't actually leave, I think protests against this break with democracy are valid. Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Sep 2019 1.19pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Stop posting shyte. You can count the number of hard right people on here on one hand and still have fingers left over but rubbishing those with opposite views has been a tactic of remainers since day one Pot Kettle
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.