Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Well I heard on radio 4 some very lurid details about what a young girl said he did. Disgusting it was. So I reckon he's guilty.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Helmet46 at 30 Jun 2014 6.54pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 6.13pm
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 6.10pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 5.50pm
Not comfortable with the Harris verdict......38 hours they took before the verdict. Not for me.
Rolf Harris is very famous, after the Saville case it isn't that far fetched to suspect that Harris was ripe for the picking.
There is money to be made and with their identity protected no downside to the case failing.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The evidence is a consistent pattern of behaviour disclosed by twelve independent of each other victims. Two or three could be argued to be just coincidence but twelve? Nah. That's bang to rights. He's been caught. It's that simple.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 6.57pm
Quote Helmet46 at 30 Jun 2014 6.54pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 6.13pm
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 6.10pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 5.50pm
Not comfortable with the Harris verdict......38 hours they took before the verdict. Not for me.
Rolf Harris is very famous, after the Saville case it isn't that far fetched to suspect that Harris was ripe for the picking.
There is money to be made and with their identity protected no downside to the case failing.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's official, Rolf is a nonce, the judge will say "do you know what it is yet?.... ..................10 years!
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 7.05pm
The evidence is a consistent pattern of behaviour disclosed by twelve independent of each other victims. Two or three could be argued to be just coincidence but twelve? Nah. That's bang to rights. He's been caught. It's that simple. It's only that simple if you are willing to believe people because they say something happened with no actual proof of it. It's only a 'consistent pattern of behaviour' if you believe the charges. Like I say, as there is no requirement to keep the charge quiet......This is a huge weakness to the whole thing. How can they be 'interdependent' to each other if there has been publicity? Once it is out there is nothing to stop people looking for money taking the opportunity of a meeting with Harris from claiming sexual advances. If there had been twelve charges against someone who had had no publicity then......I'd be as confident as you.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 7.06pm
One of them didn't have her identity protected as was her wish. One of them......and very believable she is....A great advert for your confidence.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Well I only know what I read of course unlike the jury who had the full unedited version. Twelve different victims. Twelve counts. All guilty. A nonce is about to be put away. That's good, isn't it?
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 7.18pm
Well I only know what I read of course unlike the jury who had the full unedited version. Twelve different victims. Twelve counts. All guilty. A nonce is about to be put away. That's good, isn't it?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 7.23pm
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 7.18pm
Well I only know what I read of course unlike the jury who had the full unedited version. Twelve different victims. Twelve counts. All guilty. A nonce is about to be put away. That's good, isn't it?
I'm gutted at the Rolf Harris convictions. Like many others, I couldn't believe that he, of all people, would have done stuff like that. Yet there were twelve separate charges and twelve unanimous guilty verdicts. No dissent anywhere. No majority verdicts needed. No vested interest from the Establishment to influence it either way. In a trial of this nature, I'm reluctantly coming to terms with the fact that the evidence must have been overwhelming. I can't see the trial process and the jury's verdict as anything other than completely transparent. I think you need to come to terms with this one, fella, as I have,no matter how unpalatable the whole dismal business is. And I'm the most cynical f*cker there is. Edited by Cucking Funt (30 Jun 2014 8.07pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 30 Jun 2014 8.06pm
I have a problem, Stirling. My faith in the jury system has taken a serious kicking over the last week or so. I cannot for the life of me understand how Coulson gets convicted on a range of charges yet Brooks gets an acquittal on the same accusations. I don't see how he can have been guilty yet she wasn't. It makes me very uncomfortable and starting to believe that the state can fix these things. I've posted on this elsewhere. I'm gutted at the Rolf Harris convictions. Like many others, I couldn't believe that he, of all people, would have done stuff like that. Yet there were twelve separate charges and twelve unanimous guilty verdicts. No dissent anywhere. No majority verdicts needed. No vested interest from the Establishment to influence it either way. In a trial of this nature, I'm reluctantly coming to terms with the fact that the evidence must have been overwhelming. I can't see the trial process and the jury's verdict as anything other than completely transparent. I think you need to come to terms with this one, fella, as I have,no matter how unpalatable the whole dismal business is. And I'm the most cynical f*cker there is. Edited by Cucking Funt (30 Jun 2014 8.07pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 6.57pm
Quote Helmet46 at 30 Jun 2014 6.54pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 6.13pm
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jun 2014 6.10pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jun 2014 5.50pm
Not comfortable with the Harris verdict......38 hours they took before the verdict. Not for me.
Rolf Harris is very famous, after the Saville case it isn't that far fetched to suspect that Harris was ripe for the picking.
There is money to be made and with their identity protected no downside to the case failing. I trust the justice system. 12 charges, 12 guilty verdicts and that's hard to achieve - especially if some on the jury were star struck. Wasn't there a letter he wrote, apologising to a victims family? Remember some have got off - Michael le veil, bill roache etc. It's very sad but he's tied his last kangaroo down, Sport. (Maybe he could be done for that as well)?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.