This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Just watched the second Raab Starmer head to head at PMQs and it struck me that both men are probably thoroughly decent human beings which is very unusual nowadays Decent doesnt win. Raab wont ever be PM and nor will starmer. Got to be able to hate or be hated just like the Bruce about his dad in braveheart
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Decent doesnt win. Raab wont ever be PM and nor will starmer. Got to be able to hate or be hated just like the Bruce about his dad in braveheart Tony Blair was not initially hated. Neither was David Cameron.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Decent doesnt win. Raab wont ever be PM and nor will starmer. Got to be able to hate or be hated just like the Bruce about his dad in braveheart What part of Boris is it that gives him his 'statesman like aura'? The bumbling persona? The messy blonde hair? The unnecessary use of flowery language to avoid making a coherent point? The constant and often offensive gaffes? The fathering of an unknown number of children and left behind partners? I really don't get it. He's a cartoon character; not a statesman.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
The bumbling persona? The messy blonde hair? The unnecessary use of flowery language to avoid making a coherent point? The constant and often offensive gaffes? I really don't get it. He's a cartoon character; not a statesman. Leaving aside "The fathering of an unknown number of children and left behind partners" which I don't think is relevant and is certainly not something new for senior politicians I'm not sure that Boris has a "statesman like aura" but he certainly has a great deal of charm and charisma and I think that the general populace agree judging by his overwhelming victory in the Conservative leadership and subsequent General elections
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
What part of Boris is it that gives him his 'statesman like aura'? The bumbling persona? The messy blonde hair? The unnecessary use of flowery language to avoid making a coherent point? The constant and often offensive gaffes? The fathering of an unknown number of children and left behind partners? I really don't get it. He's a cartoon character; not a statesman. He made the grade danh. You hate him. Proves my point really.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Tony Blair was not initially hated. Neither was David Cameron. Both were hated by some at some point. Iraq war,brexit.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Leaving aside "The fathering of an unknown number of children and left behind partners" which I don't think is relevant and is certainly not something new for senior politicians I'm not sure that Boris has a "statesman like aura" but he certainly has a great deal of charm and charisma and I think that the general populace agree judging by his overwhelming victory in the Conservative leadership and subsequent General elections True, that was a little bit of a dig
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
He made the grade danh. You hate him. Proves my point really. I don't hate him - not compared to some of other reprobates in the government. I just really don't get why he's so popular, especially among the working classes. He's just another under-qualified and over-ambitious Eton boy.
|
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I don't hate him - not compared to some of other reprobates in the government. I just really don't get why he's so popular, especially among the working classes. He's just another under-qualified and over-ambitious Eton boy.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I believe that Boris has had children with as many partners as I have whereas I have married all of mine so I am hardly likely to criticize him on that score
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Tony Blair was not initially hated. Neither was David Cameron. He is now Rudi, by all us Vets, after sanctioning all those 'letters of comfort' to the IRA/Sinn Fein.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I really don't get it. He's a cartoon character; not a statesman. It is his use of metaphor. Seriously. That is how he wins. Something in how the human psyche works. The way his speeches impact on people. Reaches them in a way that nobody else seems to at the moment. The only explanation, as kooky as that might sound. Throw in the genius that is Cummings with not only 'Take back Control' but the 'Get Brexit Done' spiel and you have almost the perfect example of how to hammer home an effective political message. On the face of it and given how modern politics is meant to work then Johnson should have been dead and buried decades ago. Instead, he wins in London. Twice. And now has won a massive majority in Parliament along with ridding himself of virtually any and every serious critic from within his own party. Probably the most secure Western politician as matters stand at the moment. I probably share many of your own misgivings about the man but the reality is that he connects with voters in a way that nobody else in modern British politics manages to do at the moment. And there is nobody on the Left who can come close to touching him as things stand. Starmer is wooden. Looks the part but ultimately an empty shell. I suspect Johnson is going to be PM for as long as he wants to be in that office. The Left are moribund due to their spiral into a political purity that leaves them zero flexibility and there simply is no effective opposition to him from within his own party. Johnson is political cat-nip. Whether you like him or loathe him, he can bring the votes home.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Both were hated by some at some point. Iraq war,brexit. I agree. Impressive so far. Not taking stupid issues for issues sake. Still, his entrenched ‘stay’ campaigning was too much. I was a neutral and he ignored the voice of the majority. The majority was labour...
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I don't hate him - not compared to some of other reprobates in the government. I just really don't get why he's so popular, especially among the working classes. He's just another under-qualified and over-ambitious Eton boy. You agree with his covid actions though.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
It is his use of metaphor. Seriously. That is how he wins. Something in how the human psyche works. The way his speeches impact on people. Reaches them in a way that nobody else seems to at the moment. The only explanation, as kooky as that might sound. Throw in the genius that is Cummings with not only 'Take back Control' but the 'Get Brexit Done' spiel and you have almost the perfect example of how to hammer home an effective political message. On the face of it and given how modern politics is meant to work then Johnson should have been dead and buried decades ago. Instead, he wins in London. Twice. And now has won a massive majority in Parliament along with ridding himself of virtually any and every serious critic from within his own party. Probably the most secure Western politician as matters stand at the moment. I probably share many of your own misgivings about the man but the reality is that he connects with voters in a way that nobody else in modern British politics manages to do at the moment. And there is nobody on the Left who can come close to touching him as things stand. Starmer is wooden. Looks the part but ultimately an empty shell. I suspect Johnson is going to be PM for as long as he wants to be in that office. The Left are moribund due to their spiral into a political purity that leaves them zero flexibility and there simply is no effective opposition to him from within his own party. Johnson is political cat-nip. Whether you like him or loathe him, he can bring the votes home. Yep you’re completely right. I just don’t know how more people can’t see through it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
You agree with his covid actions though. I don’t agree that he should have caught it. I think the longer this goes on the more the data shows how badly we have handled this compared to other countries, especially in the early days. A lot of it was after the horse had bolted.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Both were hated by some at some point. Iraq war,brexit. But you made the point and were right to before they became PM.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I don’t agree that he should have caught it. I think the longer this goes on the more the data shows how badly we have handled this compared to other countries, especially in the early days. A lot of it was after the horse had bolted. Time will tell danh. unlocked Germany could be back where they started if they dont slow down their R no. Sweden are getting about 100 deaths a day pro rata us. Africa have avoided high rates so far but the bubonic plague took 2 years to circle the earth. This will be quicker for sure. Maybe our way could be the better way. I reckon another 3 week lockdown coming. Comparisons are useful at the end but this is only at best the middle for some and the start for others. Also the early days were just that.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Yep you’re completely right. I just don’t know how more people can’t see through it. See through what though? Personally I struggle to understand how anybody in the Labour Party voted for Starmer. Here is a man who led the Labour Party into adopting a policy that guaranteed they would lose the 2019 election. Absolute political suicide. Labour needed to win seats in England that had overwhelmingly voted Leave since 2014 in both European Elections and the 2016 referendum. I believe ALL of their target seats were Leave-supporting constituencies with zero electoral gain by backing a second referendum, let alone the farce that Labour was pushing. Meaning Starmer was either a moron, which meant it was lunacy to vote for him, or else he sort to deliberately sabotage Labour from standing a chance. Actually wanting his own party to not only lose but lose badly. Making voting him the new leader even more stupid. Yet he breezed it. People rarely vote on logical grounds. Just need to accept it and try and work out what are the irrational ways to win elections.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.