You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 16 2024 5.01am

Why is this a BBC top story? (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 132 of 152 < 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 >

Topic Locked

View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 26 Feb 20 8.13pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

There certainly must be some kind of linkage causing a domino effect. I have little doubt the Police, and maybe even the security forces, will be investigating that aspect.

We can only hope so and also that the victims are getting all the help they need.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 8.24pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

But it was factual wasn’t it?

If you read the report you would know it wasn't.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 8.25pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

We can only hope so and also that the victims are getting all the help they need.

On that we can certainly agree.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 8.30pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

I'll leave SS to go round his endless circle in the hope he finds his promised land somewhere on the way.

There's little point in trying to reason with anyone quite as supercilious as he is.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View dannyboy1978's Profile dannyboy1978 Flag 26 Feb 20 9.46pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What religion the individual criminals claim to believe in doesn't affect the fact that it isn't Islam in the dock. It's the individual criminal.

Society needs to stop using terms that taint the innocent by association whilst always condemning the guilty.

I'm sorry but Islam is in the dock and I will listen to the experts over you pal.
If it walks like a dog and barks like a dog it's going to be a dog!!!

[Link]

Edited by dannyboy1978 (26 Feb 2020 9.46pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 10.30pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

I'm sorry but Islam is in the dock and I will listen to the experts over you pal.
If it walks like a dog and barks like a dog it's going to be a dog!!!

[Link]

Edited by dannyboy1978 (26 Feb 2020 9.46pm)

That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs.

We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism".


 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Feb 20 10.57pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs.

We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism".


You are a weirdo.
That's so you can bracket it with terrorism from non islamic groups or individuals. Why?
If you didnt know most islam followers arnt terrorists but most terrorists are islam followers.
Just so you cant throw back
"You said it wasnt about muslims" line.
Also most muslims are islamic by the way; they sort of go hand in hand!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 27 Feb 20 6.09am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Untrue. They should be called "organised gangs of child molesting criminals". Only if every Muslim in the UK was involved should the term "Muslim" be used.

So by that token if a section of Palace and Brighton fans started fighting they shouldn't be called "Palace and Brighton fans" as not every Palace or Brighton fan in the UK was involved

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View dannyboy1978's Profile dannyboy1978 Flag 27 Feb 20 6.48am Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs.

We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism".

A fundamentalist is a person from a specific group, in this case it's Islam. Why you so scared to call that group by their name.


Out of interest how would you define a Catholic priest peodophile in your PC language?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 27 Feb 20 7.06am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs.

We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism".


Most people understand you say.
Surely that being the case why shouldn't they be called islamic?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 27 Feb 20 9.14am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Most people understand you say.
Surely that being the case why shouldn't they be called islamic?

It ought to be obvious.

A better question is why should they? What does it achieve? Positive or negative results?

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 27 Feb 20 9.26am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Here WE rather lays himself bare here.

It's not about whether it's positive or negative.

It's about what is true.

Lies cannot hold.....He stated on here some time ago that if a lie is effective then it's useful.

No it isn't.

A lie, may get you out of a tight spot but like the quote from Lincoln goes....'You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.'

Ultimately people need the truth....Whether they want it or not...But unfortunately with WE they aren't going to get that.....because he's interested in what's positive.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2020 9.32am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 132 of 152 < 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic