If it's illegal then why has the court not set the decision aside. Why has she not complained to the Electoral Commission. Where is her evidence of corruption? If it's so significant to impact the vote why have the courts and or parliament and or the Electoral Commission not called for a re-run.

This is pretty desperate even for Remainers. I guess you could call her claims fake news, oh that's ironic!

Edited by Badger11 (21 Oct 2019 8.19am)

One more point

as most of them are remainers I doubt your assertion, wissy..How on earth are they able to be there EVERY day if they have jobs?? Therefore they are Hardcore in my opinion (which believe it or not is as valid as yours)...suppose if you didnt live in Cornwall you would be there too, giving them the benefit of your 'experience'?

This little tete-a-tete pretty much sums up the whole of Brexit up to this point for me.

"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one"

I think it's worse that Oliver Letwin isn't standing and for him to actually risk something.

Now you've done it..... wait for the Wissie repetitive post

We have been round this track 100 pages ago!

No Soros money is currently involved in funding "Best for Britain". An "Open Society" foundation he funds, but which operates independently, provided some seed funding and was immediately attacked for doing so in the right wing press, which is probably where you get these ideas.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It's a good question. The government did consider the evidence and decided that it was politically unwise to try to overturn the result but whether a legal challenge would have done so is obviously an open question. I don't know if it was even considered and if so what the conclusions reached were, but it did not reach a Court. Not yet anyway.

Complaining to the Electoral Commission would be a waste of time. Their role is small and very specific. They don't get involved in whether a campaign is legal or not, only if it's finances are correct.

There is nothing the least bit fake about a chart which details the trend of people's voting intentions flipping at the precise moment that fake claims by a campaign received widespread publicity, only to revert to their previous state a few months later.

It's pretty conclusive evidence of the impact. Not on devoted opponents of EU membership but on the swing voters. When only a 2% less of a swing would have reversed the result this was critical.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

On Saturday most supported remaining in the EU but not every day. They come from both sides of the argument.

My son in law has been there protesting. He works in the city, so goes after work and at weekends. People work shifts. Some are retired. There are many reasons how people can give up their time to protest.

Would I be there? To observe and listen. Maybe. Not to protest. I really don't see the point.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Many will admire her for having the courage of her convictions and doing what she believes to be right, despite the pressure and the prospect of losing her job as a consequence.

I would always vote for an MP of conviction rather then a lobby sheep, irrespective of whether or not I agreed with them on any particular issue.

Only time will tell whether there are enough people of principle in her constituency to return her again.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I fancy her, got to say.....

Bit of a dominatrix, hopefully