This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
It's also a classic deflectionary tactic. Deflecting what.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Hows your budget for the next 6 months then? 6 months are you f***ing kidding me!! I voted out for 10,20,30 years knowing there would be a dip. Why are these remoaners always thinking about here and now. I will be happy to take a dip in the pocket for a better future. Imnso angry with their short sightedness!!!
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
So let’s just all blindly stumble along and not attempt to plan, predict or forecast anything, as you can’t be 100%... I assume you ignore weather forecasts as well. Roy Hodgson can’t accurately forecast where we’ll finish in a season, so should he just stop bothering to look at the team or where we might encounter problems? No one knows what would happen if we sold Zaha, Guita and Luka so let’s just do it? It’s a moronic approach to decision making. There are positive forecasts, or are they not relevant?
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
There are positive forecasts, or are they not relevant? Where have I said anything to suggest that?
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
6 months are you f***ing kidding me!! I voted out for 10,20,30 years knowing there would be a dip. Why are these remoaners always thinking about here and now. I will be happy to take a dip in the pocket for a better future. Imnso angry with their short sightedness!!! I thought you didn’t trust experts? So how did you know that?
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
6 months are you f***ing kidding me!! I voted out for 10,20,30 years knowing there would be a dip. Why are these remoaners always thinking about here and now. I will be happy to take a dip in the pocket for a better future. Imnso angry with their short sightedness!!! Remainers want all positives and any negative seems to trump a positive.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
I thought you didn’t trust experts? So how did you know that? You been having wissy lessons on discection.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
I thought you didn’t trust experts? So how did you know that? Dip! not the worst case scenario being spouted out by the "experts"
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
On Saturday most supported remaining in the EU but not every day. They come from both sides of the argument. My son in law has been there protesting. He works in the city, so goes after work and at weekends. People work shifts. Some are retired. There are many reasons how people can give up their time to protest. Would I be there? To observe and listen. Maybe. Not to protest. I really don't see the point. I call bulls*** wissy
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
I assume you ignore weather forecasts as well. I'm not sure that's a very good example as the weather forecast is seldom correct
|
|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
Ha ha,you assume I read the "right wing press". Because they have said there isn't very quick to believe everything you want to .... I cannot think where else you would get these ideas, except on social media groups repeating them. They have stated that all funding has ceased and they are now crowdfunded. As I think they are obliged by law to restrict that funding to a quite small amount without giving details and publish any support in excess then I think we can all believe them.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
I have done see the post ...soros funded best for Britain...who paid for them to go to Brussels.... not so mad really was it. You love repeating distorting half truths don't you? It's the classic way conspiracy theories get spread and turned into the "truth" that the already convinced want to hear. Soros contributed to the seed funding for Best for Britain, to get it started, pay for premises and a small staff. Now it's overheads are paid for via crowdfunding. He would have had nothing to do with this trip.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
6 months are you f***ing kidding me!! I voted out for 10,20,30 years knowing there would be a dip. Why are these remoaners always thinking about here and now. I will be happy to take a dip in the pocket for a better future. Imnso angry with their short sightedness!!! My children and grandchildren are as mad as hell with your short sightedness and selfishness. They hold more votes than you and now 2 more than did in 2016.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
A guy on the wireless said what wissy was saying about referendum being non binding and mps decide what's best. Obviously, because the status quo needs no further work. Leaving after 40 years of entanglement requires a lot of further work.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You love repeating distorting half truths don't you? It's the classic way conspiracy theories get spread and turned into the "truth" that the already convinced want to hear. Soros contributed to the seed funding for Best for Britain, to get it started, pay for premises and a small staff. Now it's overheads are paid for via crowdfunding. He would have had nothing to do with this trip. Oh really getting fed up with me repeating myself....f***ing hell kettle pot springs to mind.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
My children and grandchildren are as mad as hell with your short sightedness and selfishness. They hold more votes than you and now 2 more than did in 2016. Milkshakes at dawn?
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
This is an indicative vote it will not bind the house however it will tell us if Boris has the votes if he can't get them on this then he has no chance with the legislation. That's untrue. What the government was trying to introduce was a "meaningful vote" on the unamended version. If it had passed they intended to withdraw the letter they sent on Saturday night. This was truly an executive v Parliament test which Bercow had no real alternative than to refuse, as I think any Speaker would have done. It looks like yet another stunt by Johnson to cast himself in the role of martyr in the eyes of the people, supported by his cheer leaders in the right wing press, in preparation for the GE to come. He must have known it would fail and all the bluster is therefore just window dressing. The second reading of the WAB will probably pass but Parliament will take charge of the timetable and not allow the government to railroad it through. That's my current reading of tomorrow.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's untrue. What the government was trying to introduce was a "meaningful vote" on the unamended version. If it had passed they intended to withdraw the letter they sent on Saturday night. This was truly an executive v Parliament test which Bercow had no real alternative than to refuse, as I think any Speaker would have done. It looks like yet another stunt by Johnson to cast himself in the role of martyr in the eyes of the people, supported by his cheer leaders in the right wing press, in preparation for the GE to come. He must have known it would fail and all the bluster is therefore just window dressing. The second reading of the WAB will probably pass but Parliament will take charge of the timetable and not allow the government to railroad it through. That's my current reading of tomorrow.
There are some knuckledraggers, racists and xenophobes on the leave side no doubt, and I hate the hate in that respect. But patronising everyone continually isn’t going to sway many votes. I’m sure you think you are coming across as reasoned, truth be told I interpret it as dogmatic and that you have a superiority complex.. You seem completely unable to concede on anything, even when faced with reasoned debate back.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.