I've no idea what you are talking about? You said that I sent you a message telling you that people are laughing at you? I did no such thing.

I have read the thread. And I support your opening post.

I'm tough. I'm ambitious. I know exactly what I want. If that makes me a bitch, I'm OK with that.

If you have read the thread you will see that is was SE9 that made those comments and it was SE9 I played them back to, not you.

In fact I rather liked your post, although I don't usually like people making personal attacks on others.

Enough is known to be sure it isn't a "defect" as you put it. No gene is "defective" in homosexual people. There may be a genetic difference, but that doesn't equate to a "defect" any more than having blue eyes or brown hair does.

You said "...the male version mates with the female version - just like in every other species" but that isn't true, as I've shown. So it does detract from your point because that was one of your main points.

If this is how we "evolved to procreate", why do so many other species display homosexual behaviour then?

I think equating tolerance of homosexuality with believing the earth is flat is a little desperate. Nobody said you were a sheep, nor was any point made about the last general election. The point is people are rightly becoming more and more accepting of gay people. You appear to be out of step with that progressive view, whether you think the majority are numpties or not.

Wilbs did a grand job when he came on today and I was happy to see him instead of Gayle.

"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

It cannot be genetic for very obvious reasons.

Most evidence points towards human sexuality being somewhat fluid, and engaged in for pleasure principle rather than procreation, with a significant percentage of the population being capable of sexual activity with both male and female partners. Most humans seem to fix on a sexual orientation in their teens, whilst some people seem to be 'pre-selected' on a single gender and know from a very early age (this may be a genetic factor, hardwire sexual orientation to either same sex, opposite sex etc).

The truth of human sexuality is that its predominately bi-sexual, and driven by sexual preferences. Most 'straight' men will have experimented with other men, and many gay men will have had intercourse with women (even raised families).

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Heheheh he did indeed.

A couple of things Seth - you sure about the defective thing ? Having brown or blue eyes is surely more equitable to liking blondes or brunettes rather than being gay or not. I call it a 'defect' because it means you are predisposed not to continue the species - and all life is 'designed' to do this.

Also what do you mean the male version doesn't mate with the female version in any other species and where have you proved this isn't true ? To mate means to create offspring, and I cant see that's possible in any way, anywhere without male and female sexual organs getting together.

I was then pointing out that being with the majority is a weak argument and is not necessarily desirous as they are often wrong, and cited a couple of examples of this, of course they had nothing to do with the gay question, just example of the whims of human nature.

You state I am out of step with being accepting of gays, but where have I shown that ? If you read my original post I clearly endorsed it - everyone is welcome to fvck whoever they like as long as they are over 18 and keen on the idea, and good luck to them.

Still no-one has come up with a definite reason why it isn't a gene defect. Happy to have my opinion changed with proof, but I feel there is too much PC-ness here for that at present.

You'll be forever in my family's memories and it was an honor and privilege to play and lead in the red and blue
Yours sincerely
Mile Jedinak