Want to elaborate? I've given Corbyn credit for doing alot better than I thought he would but other than that, I still think they're all c***s

The mountains are calling & I must go.

Tories: Corbyn makes excuses for terrorism.
The man's actual words: "That assessment in no way reduces the guilt of those who attack our children. Those terrorists will forever be reviled and held to account for their actions. But an informed understanding of the causes of terrorism is an essential part of an effective response that will protect the security of our people that fights rather than fuels terrorism.”
The Tories do not have the integrity to apologise, but they should.

I happen to agree with you nick, The Tories should be absolutely hammering Corbyn, this should have been the most pointless election in my lifetime yet the gap is closing & the Tories have no idea how respond.

The mountains are calling & I must go.

What's the point? You equate May as being as bad as Corbyn. It's obvious that what is important to you differs from me.

Like I say, man overboard.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 May 2017 1.48pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

More national debt and people who can't do sums?

Eh? How do you work that one out?

This isn't just Johnson. The US intelligence agency, MI6 reports, and seemingly half the cabinet have previously echoed what Corbyn said, yet now condemn him.

In my eyes the only criticism of Corbyn is that his comments don't go far enough. We still support and rely on Saudi Arabia, for example, who helped fund the Mujahadeen which Bin Laden emerged from, and were primary financiers of ISIS. Even now they are driving millions of Yemenites in to poverty, starvation and exile. ISIS and Al Qaeda are both growing exponentially in Yemen.

If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Whatever foreign policy we have, whatever concessions to Islamic ideas we have still they would want to blow us up, still they would want to have an Islamic totalitarian regime here.

Edited by hedgehog50 (27 May 2017 5.32pm)

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

A recognition that an extremist section of a minority feel resentment over foreign policy is not an excuse for a policy for appeasement.

Poland took part in both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars....They don't get Islamic terrorist attacks, they are very rare in many eastern EU countries for obvious reasons.....though I doubt you would support the political decisions that led to that....even though there are people alive in Poland now who wouldn't be otherwise.

Extremist groups have been a serious problem in Yehem for a long time...for a significant time before the House of Saud got involved.

Yours and others wishful thinking attachment to a foreign policy that appeases to reduce attacks is nothing short of simplistic thinking. The problem is here....thanks for the stupidity of idealists....it is here now....and different governments or foreign policies won't change anything.

There have always been high level supporters of a policy of appeasement. It's gone from official governmental policy in the past to being derided as a fool's path.

I guess you can guess what I consider it as.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 May 2017 6.28pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Anyone who even remotely thinks Corbyn's Labour has a chance of winning needs to join a search party for their other brain cell.

I shouldn't mock I know....but I'm going to enjoy the day after the election on here.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Is the right answer.

Buy Litecoin.