This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
Wisbech - we agree for a change. It's not just now, they have existed for many years. Nor is it limited to the Home Office. I suspect it's a combination of factors. Understaffing, lack of motivation, over-complicated and contradictory regulations and increased demand. I have seen some idiotic and very late decisions made by junior staff that then get elevated to a more senior level by me, resulting in longer delays and more convoluted explanations to try to justify the stupid decision. Ten years ago I took the Home Office to an Appeal Court and won. I am still waiting for my costs to be repaid.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
How would you feel if you had done nothing wrong and your name was all across the media. I would certainly be pissed off but most of us don't have the money to fight it. It has been proved elsewhere that he has been complicit in wrong doing. Just not in the UK.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
Starmer and Sue Grey were in cahoots when she was burying Boris and the BBC has reported what it had to only - the bare minimum - and to me it is big news. Of course, they weren't in cahoots! She has the highest reputation for integrity. Which is why she was chosen to look at Johnson's behaviour. Braverman tried to avoid being spotted and outed. That's genuine news. She is a hypocrite. Nothing left/right involved. Except in certain minds.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Agreed much ado about nothing. By the way suppose one of us had to attend one of these courses and when you arrived you bumped into her and a battery of photographers. Next day there you are all over the papers and you boss wants to know whey you failed to tell him? She wanted to arrange the course for her convenience but I doubt that others attending the same course would want the publicity either. The courses are virtual these days and before you start you have a private 5 mins with the lecturer in which they check your details and you can choose the name you want to use. Anonymity is guaranteed. She really ought to have known that!!!! She could have easily disguised herself and used another name. I was on one 2 weeks ago. I have no idea who the other people were. I hardly glanced at their faces. There is no need to say anything either, if you choose not to. She could easily have avoided this story.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The courses are virtual these days and before you start you have a private 5 mins with the lecturer in which they check your details and you can choose the name you want to use. Anonymity is guaranteed. She really ought to have known that!!!! She could have easily disguised herself and used another name. I was on one 2 weeks ago. I have no idea who the other people were. I hardly glanced at their faces. There is no need to say anything either, if you choose not to. She could easily have avoided this story. Okay I was going by my friend she had to attend one in person only last year and was embarrassed about the whole thing. If there had been a bank of photographers outside because of a celeb she would have been mortified. If you're saying it's all by computer then I don't see a problem.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Okay I was going by my friend she had to attend one in person only last year and was embarrassed about the whole thing. If there had been a bank of photographers outside because of a celeb she would have been mortified. If you're saying it's all by computer then I don't see a problem. In-person courses are still available, but why choose one if you can just sit in front of a screen, watch some videos and tick a few boxes from time to time? Unless you cannot use a computer and we know Braverman can.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
In-person courses are still available, but why choose one if you can just sit in front of a screen, watch some videos and tick a few boxes from time to time? Unless you cannot use a computer and we know Braverman can. Thank God the people running them are not public sector and in dispute with the Government. If you think it wouldn’t have got out you are living in cloud cuckoo land. Personally I think she isn’t a particularly nice person, but she enquired, realised it wasn’t possible and then took the points. Personally I’d rather a Government minister works on important things, as if she had taken the course no doubt people would have been bleating about how she wasn’t working. Sorry to hear you got caught though - must have been weird for you to sit back and have to listen to someone else dispense advice.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
In-person courses are still available, but why choose one if you can just sit in front of a screen, watch some videos and tick a few boxes from time to time? Unless you cannot use a computer and we know Braverman can. What do you have to do - play Grand Theft Auto?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
In-person courses are still available, but why choose one if you can just sit in front of a screen, watch some videos and tick a few boxes from time to time? Unless you cannot use a computer and we know Braverman can. It’s not just a tick box excercise. You have to join a live course on zoom or teams at a time of their choosing.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
It’s not just a tick box excercise. You have to join a live course on zoom or teams at a time of their choosing. Indeed you do. Was on one last year
|
|
|
Mr Loophole (celebrity lawyer) says he organises these private courses for his clients on a regular basis. Just saying..
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
It’s not just a tick box excercise. You have to join a live course on zoom or teams at a time of their choosing. I was on one 3 weeks ago. I chose the date and time from a selection of providers. It started at 9.30 and was done by 12 with a 15 min break. Some people didn't say anything. There were a few questions for which answers on paper were requested to be shown to your screen. Most of it was the presenter showing pictures and videos and asking people what they noticed about the likely speed limit or stopping distances, which were answered by a few more involved than others.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I was on one 3 weeks ago. I chose the date and time from a selection of providers. It started at 9.30 and was done by 12 with a 15 min break. Some people didn't say anything. There were a few questions for which answers on paper were requested to be shown to your screen. Most of it was the presenter showing pictures and videos and asking people what they noticed about the likely speed limit or stopping distances, which were answered by a few more involved than others. Once they realised that you were there, I’m surprised they didn’t invite you to run the course.
|
|
|
Originally posted by palace_in_frogland
Once they realised that you were there, I’m surprised they didn’t invite you to run the course. The course was run by a driving school instructor whose presentation skills were not that high, and who thought he is a comedian but isn't. There were lots of stifled yawns. Even so, as already have 6 points on my licence through being caught twice in the same week by newly installed lights in an area where the limit had recently been lowered from 40 to 30, neither of which I was aware of, I don't think anyone is likely to replace him with me!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
I bet Wisbech was correct on everything Surprised Wisbech didn't "make that call" to have a private session due to his celebrity status Edited by Forest Hillbilly (22 May 2023 9.47am) Got the basics right but learned a couple of things about decreased limits for vans on national roads. You never stop learning!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
i found out my road knowledge was out-of-date. I thought all roundabouts were a 30mph limit. Not so, Grandad.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Got the basics right but learned a couple of things about decreased limits for vans on national roads. You never stop learning! Over 3 tons is 60 in a dual carriageway. Even though 70 is the limit. A friend found that out with a lease van!
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.