Topic

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Page 1520 of 2586 < 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 >

Topic Locked

Teddy Eagle 24 Mar 19 1.47pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Funny how people say a vote three years ago remains relevant despite evidence to the contrary. Do you also believe that parliamentary elections should not be held regularly? _______________________________________________________ A referendum is a single issue vote. In the future should all referenda be Best of 3? Or 5 if the result isn’t as required?
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 24 Mar 19 1.51pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Funny how people say a vote three years ago remains relevant despite evidence to the contrary. Do you also believe that parliamentary elections should not be held regularly? Evidence from where? Pro-EU press or just your opinion. So are you saying we should have a referendum every few years? Presumably only if the results do not meet your agenda. Please answer me one thing: If we hold another referendum and the result is the same, would you be prepared to honour it or would you say, we need another one as some young people have now reached the voting age?
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 24 Mar 19 1.51pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Funny how people say a vote three years ago remains relevant despite evidence to the contrary. Do you also believe that parliamentary elections should not be held regularly?

Evidence from where? Pro-EU press or just your opinion.
So are you saying we should have a referendum every few years? Presumably only if the results do not meet your agenda.
Please answer me one thing: If we hold another referendum and the result is the same, would you be prepared to honour it or would you say, we need another one as some young people have now reached the voting age?

Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol 24 Mar 19 2.17pm
Originally posted by Spiderman Evidence from where? Pro-EU press or just your opinion. So are you saying we should have a referendum every few years? Presumably only if the results do not meet your agenda. Please answer me one thing: If we hold another referendum and the result is the same, would you be prepared to honour it or would you say, we need another one as some young people have now reached the voting age? No, only one is required, now that most people realise leaving the EU is a bad idea Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah
Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol

24 Mar 19 2.17pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

No, only one is required, now that most people realise leaving the EU is a bad idea

Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 24 Mar 19 2.23pm
Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures. That is what people want, the end of brexit.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 24 Mar 19 2.23pm

Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures.

That is what people want, the end of brexit.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 24 Mar 19 2.48pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures. That is what people want, the end of brexit _______________________________________________________ Isn’t it just awful when you don’t get what you want?
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 24 Mar 19 2.55pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures. That is what people want, the end of brexit. Just another 12.4 million to go then until they reach parity. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Mar 2019 2.55pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

24 Mar 19 2.55pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures.

That is what people want, the end of brexit.

Just another 12.4 million to go then until they reach parity.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Mar 2019 2.55pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 24 Mar 19 2.59pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Funny how people say a vote three years ago remains relevant despite evidence to the contrary. Do you also believe that parliamentary elections should not be held regularly? You didn't care about giving a referendum when there was significant anti EU feeling before 2016 and we hadn't had a vote for over forty years. So this argument carries no weight. Only a person who had called for regular votes on EU membership would have any validity with this. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

24 Mar 19 2.59pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Funny how people say a vote three years ago remains relevant despite evidence to the contrary. Do you also believe that parliamentary elections should not be held regularly?

You didn't care about giving a referendum when there was significant anti EU feeling before 2016 and we hadn't had a vote for over forty years.

So this argument carries no weight. Only a person who had called for regular votes on EU membership would have any validity with this.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 24 Mar 19 3.59pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures. That is what people want, the end of brexit. So you want to ignore the referendum result but want to listen to a petition. You don't care what people want.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

24 Mar 19 3.59pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by steeleye20

Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures.

That is what people want, the end of brexit.

So you want to ignore the referendum result but want to listen to a petition.

You don't care what people want.

Alert a moderator to this post

Maine Eagle USA 24 Mar 19 4.12pm
Originally posted by ChrisGC What a terrible analogy. Lol. Care to explain why or just want to leave it there. Debate tends to call for reasons for particular assertions. Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.
Alert a moderator to this post

Maine Eagle

USA 24 Mar 19 4.12pm

Originally posted by ChrisGC

What a terrible analogy.

Lol. Care to explain why or just want to leave it there.

Debate tends to call for reasons for particular assertions.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

Alert a moderator to this post

Bobtail Crowborough 24 Mar 19 4.13pm
You can have as many marches and petitions as you like. These are just today's gimmicks to amuse the kids. This ain't a telly game show. The only vote that counts is that through the ballot box, and it's about time people respected it. Originally posted by steeleye20 Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures. That is what people want, the end of brexit. Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see
Alert a moderator to this post

Bobtail

Crowborough 24 Mar 19 4.13pm

You can have as many marches and petitions as you like. These are just today's gimmicks to amuse the kids. This ain't a telly game show. The only vote that counts is that through the ballot box, and it's about time people respected it.

Originally posted by steeleye20

Brexit petition to revoke article 50 reaches 5m signatures.

That is what people want, the end of brexit.

Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 24 Mar 19 4.13pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Using my logic you have a referendum when it appears strongly likely the electorate has a different view to the status quo. In reality as I have said before I do not think plebiscites work, there is too much information and it's impossible to get anywhere approaching objectivity with such a huge number of people to educate. So instead populism holds sway. Nevertheless, the genie is out of the bottle, damage is being done and we need to cauterise the problem. It appears a third referendum may be one of very few possibilities. To repeat, if the electorate doesn't want Brexit then it is undemocratic to force it upon them. If the electorate does want Brexit then its reaffirmation will be useful in the negotiations. And as you clearly believe the people want Brexit - and that the second referendum wasn't an aberration driven by other issues than EU membership - you have nothing to fear from one. So get behind it and achieve your reaffirmation. You know it makes sense. Complete self serving waffle. When will stop this drivel? The electorate is ignorant of many things and yet we allow them to elect a government on a regular basis. Most of what they hear is disinformation, so you could argue that they could only be better disinformed for another referendum. Any reasons claimed for a second referendum could be argued for a third and fourth and fifth. In short, there is no justification whatever to waste time purely because the losing side didn't like losing and deludes itself that it is intellectually superior. Just let it go please. It's becoming truly pathetic.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

24 Mar 19 4.13pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Using my logic you have a referendum when it appears strongly likely the electorate has a different view to the status quo. In reality as I have said before I do not think plebiscites work, there is too much information and it's impossible to get anywhere approaching objectivity with such a huge number of people to educate. So instead populism holds sway.

Nevertheless, the genie is out of the bottle, damage is being done and we need to cauterise the problem. It appears a third referendum may be one of very few possibilities.

To repeat, if the electorate doesn't want Brexit then it is undemocratic to force it upon them. If the electorate does want Brexit then its reaffirmation will be useful in the negotiations. And as you clearly believe the people want Brexit - and that the second referendum wasn't an aberration driven by other issues than EU membership - you have nothing to fear from one. So get behind it and achieve your reaffirmation. You know it makes sense.

Complete self serving waffle.

When will stop this drivel? The electorate is ignorant of many things and yet we allow them to elect a government on a regular basis.
Most of what they hear is disinformation, so you could argue that they could only be better disinformed for another referendum. Any reasons claimed for a second referendum could be argued for a third and fourth and fifth. In short, there is no justification whatever to waste time purely because the losing side didn't like losing and deludes itself that it is intellectually superior.

Just let it go please. It's becoming truly pathetic.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 24 Mar 19 4.17pm
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol No, only one is required, now that most people realise leaving the EU is a bad idea But that is just a self serving lie. Everyone I know who voted leave is doubly determined to see democracy applied. You have no clue what Brexiters think. You don't even live here.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

24 Mar 19 4.17pm

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

No, only one is required, now that most people realise leaving the EU is a bad idea

But that is just a self serving lie.

Everyone I know who voted leave is doubly determined to see democracy applied.

You have no clue what Brexiters think. You don't even live here.

Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 1520 of 2586 < 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Site Map

Sponsors