This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Or Britain could simply decide not to bother with any of that - just say that it will then don't. A bit like how every government and the EU really works. It's not like Ireland is going to actually do anything except moan. We've our own pressing issues: the North is not one of them. Personally I would go for the ham sandwich with 10 health certificates rather than 2. And probably get food poisoning.
|
|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
EU beef with full provenance.......last seen breaking down in the 3.20 at Epsom Looks like there is something going on over meat currently. The last beef wars went well for Ireland. Only held it back for 40 years or so.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Looks like there is something going on over meat currently. The last beef wars went well for Ireland. Only held it back for 40 years or so. To be honest I think there is a case to be made for us being willing to continue with various protections for the Irish agriculutual produce. We are their biggest market and to put it bluntly, it is not in our short, mid or long term interests to see them impovorished. Their politicians, with notable exceptions, are gobs***es of the highest order and like nothing more than prancing around pretending to be Europeans as opposed to just the West Brits they are but much like the white trash cousins you have to invite to family weddings, we do share enough DNA to mean they need special consideration. Chuck 'em a bone (no pun intended) on issues around meat and so on is my attitude.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
To be honest I think there is a case to be made for us being willing to continue with various protections for the Irish agriculutual produce. We are their biggest market and to put it bluntly, it is not in our short, mid or long term interests to see them impovorished. Their politicians, with notable exceptions, are gobs***es of the highest order and like nothing more than prancing around pretending to be Europeans as opposed to just the West Brits they are but much like the white trash cousins you have to invite to family weddings, we do share enough DNA to mean they need special consideration. Chuck 'em a bone (no pun intended) on issues around meat and so on is my attitude. Agreed I have no problem with special arrangements for Irish farmers. Brexit is about the UK taking back our independence not trying to destroy our neighbours.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Agreed I have no problem with special arrangements for Irish farmers. Brexit is about the UK taking back our independence not trying to destroy our neighbours. Perhaps the EU would be wise to reciprocate.
|
|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Perhaps the EU would be wise to reciprocate.
One more point |
|
|
Laughing all the way to the Banks. I hope they leave Carole Codswallop with her cats at least. Take everything else though. [Tweet Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Laughing all the way to the Banks. I hope they leave Carole Codswallop with her cats at least. Take everything else though. [Tweet Link]Now for front page apologies and prime-time news slot retractions for all organisations that peddled this bulls*** because it was convenient for deluded remainiacs to believe in it. Come on, C4, Independent, BBC, Grauniad - should I bother holding my breath?
|
|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Now for front page apologies and prime-time news slot retractions for all organisations that peddled this bulls*** because it was convenient for deluded remainiacs to believe in it. Come on, C4, Independent, BBC, Grauniad - should I bother holding my breath? The Russians must be a little annoyed with the left.
|
|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Laughing all the way to the Banks. I hope they leave Carole Codswallop with her cats at least. Take everything else though. [Tweet Link]I don't think the problem is a lack of evidence. The problem is a lack of admissible evidence. Our security services possess the evidence but they are not going to appear in Court to give it. They risk compromising their sources should they do so. So they never do so, as a matter of policy. Carole Cadwalladr has strong contacts within our security services, which is how she broke the Cambridge Analytica scandal in the first place. She knows the truth, but knowing and proving are two different things. Hearsay evidence, even from immaculate sources, isn't admissible. The truth will eventually be proved one day. Be patient.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't think the problem is a lack of evidence. The problem is a lack of admissible evidence. Our security services possess the evidence but they are not going to appear in Court to give it. They risk compromising their sources should they do so. So they never do so, as a matter of policy. Carole Cadwalladr has strong contacts within our security services, which is how she broke the Cambridge Analytica scandal in the first place. She knows the truth, but knowing and proving are two different things. Hearsay evidence, even from immaculate sources, isn't admissible. The truth will eventually be proved one day. Be patient. -.-'
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't think the problem is a lack of evidence. The problem is a lack of admissible evidence. Our security services possess the evidence but they are not going to appear in Court to give it. They risk compromising their sources should they do so. So they never do so, as a matter of policy. Carole Cadwalladr has strong contacts within our security services, which is how she broke the Cambridge Analytica scandal in the first place. She knows the truth, but knowing and proving are two different things. Hearsay evidence, even from immaculate sources, isn't admissible. The truth will eventually be proved one day. Be patient. So do you agree trump has a point then. Not a lack of evidence just a lack of admissible evidence. Along side people afraid of being totally wiped out if they actually come forward. Both by antifa and the media. I'm sure the truth will be proved. One day!
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.