This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Very true....attractive young women doing anything will bring a certain understandable audience. You obviously haven't watched any of it as it's very difficult to find any of them that might be deemed attractive and one of the umpires who is an ex cricketer must be at least 25 stone
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
You obviously haven't watched any of it as it's very difficult to find any of them that might be deemed attractive and one of the umpires who is an ex cricketer must be at least 25 stone I think he's gone along with WE
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
You obviously haven't watched any of it as it's very difficult to find any of them that might be deemed attractive and one of the umpires who is an ex cricketer must be at least 25 stone Fear not, women's world cup on the horizon. Keep an eye out for the Scandinavian teams or, my personal favourites, the Belgians.
|
|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
At last night's Television and Radio Industries awards bash, Nigel Farage won best news presenter, Julia Hartley-Brewer won best radio programme and GB News won best multi-channel news programme. Not a word about it on the BBC! These awards are based on the public voting - yet another gainsay to the idea that the majority are now Woke. What percentage of people do you think; a) are aware of the existence of the Teleivsion and Radio Industries awards? b) Voted for the winners?
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
What percentage of people do you think; a) are aware of the existence of the Teleivsion and Radio Industries awards? b) Voted for the winners? The TRIC organisation has been around for 50 years. For the first time, this year's awards were based entirely on the public vote. 130,000 people voted for 17 categories (1.3 million votes in total).
|
|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The TRIC organisation has been around for 50 years. For the first time, this year's awards were based entirely on the public vote. 130,000 people voted for 17 categories (1.3 million votes in total). So 0.19% of the population voted...
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
So 0.19% of the population voted... Because the whole population usually votes on awards? What about the General election? Will you only allow the result if 100% vote? You are a typical Lefty. You can't stand it when people rattle your self righteous delusions of virtue and intellect by having the audacity to disagree.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Because the whole population usually votes on awards? What about the General election? Will you only allow the result if 100% vote? You are a typical Lefty. You can't stand it when people rattle your self righteous delusions of virtue and intellect by having the audacity to disagree. Still arguing with the phantom man in your head - good luck to you.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
So 0.19% of the population voted... So you are including babes in arms as non-voters.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Still arguing with the phantom man in your head - good luck to you. No, I reserve my arguing for pompous lefty twits. For example, people who try to downplay top industry awards because they don't like the result. Perhaps they should get a job in the mainstream media with all the other virtue signalling bellends.
|
|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
So you are including babes in arms as non-voters. Round it up if you'd like, I don't think it changes the argument.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No, I reserve my arguing for pompous lefty twits. For example, people who try to downplay top industry awards because they don't like the result. Perhaps they should get a job in the mainstream media with all the other virtue signalling bellends. Do you think I give a single sh*t who won an award that I had never heard of until today? The argument was made that this award is "yet another gainsay to the idea that the majority are now Woke." I pointed out that a miniscule percentage of the population took part, and therefore it's not really reflective of anything.
I've always wondered how people end up like you do - quite sad really.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Do you think I give a single sh*t who won an award that I had never heard of until today? The argument was made that this award is "yet another gainsay to the idea that the majority are now Woke." I pointed out that a miniscule percentage of the population took part, and therefore it's not really reflective of anything.
I've always wondered how people end up like you do - quite sad really. Have a nice day.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Round it up if you'd like, I don't think it changes the argument. So you are also including kids - say under 12.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
You've then gone on rants about "self righteous delusion of virtue" and decided to insult me.
he named you a 'virtue signalling bellend'' ....seemingly.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.