This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Haha, get over yourself mate.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think your reply is further evidence that you don't read replies. Indeed I made the mistake in replying to someone who can't really participate much beyond their own world view. That's fine....I suppose....But Wisbech stop posting at me. You just don't have the tools and should stay in the mental lane you are capable of.....Similar to how you can't seem to post properly.
Oh I read and "understood" your reply perfectly well. What is obvious is that when called out for making indefensible statements you resort to attacking your critic rather than responding to the criticism. Which is a very Trumpian tactic. Hitler went further of course. He murdered them. I will post replies as I see fit, and should I choose to, and not at the behest of anyone else. You have no obligation to either read or respond. That is your choice.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Because the statement was about the Nazis and not about the communists. Simple.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Unlike Stalin and Mao then? No not unlike Stalin or Mao, but as we weren't discussing them to introduce them is a diversion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No not unlike Stalin or Mao, but as we weren't discussing them to introduce them is a diversion. We’re discussing Nazi Germany on a thread about bias against Trump but Stalin and Mao are a diversion? If one mass murderer is so much worse than the others then left wing genocidal maniacs are exempt I suppose.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Because the statement was about the Nazis and not about the communists. Simple. Not simple. Accusing another person of being a Nazi is a cliche. My question was why when there are historically more murderous and repressive examples.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Not simple. Accusing another person of being a Nazi is a cliche. My question was why when there are historically more murderous and repressive examples. I have no idea. It wasn't me to brought it up!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Haha, get over yourself mate. Oh look it's accountancy's answer to Che Guevara telling me to get over myself.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
We’re discussing Nazi Germany on a thread about bias against Trump but Stalin and Mao are a diversion? If one mass murderer is so much worse than the others then left wing genocidal maniacs are exempt I suppose. The topic was about Nazis being socialists. Introducing anything else is a diversion. It wasn't about mass murderers in general. That is another subject.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh I read and "understood" your reply perfectly well. What is obvious is that when called out for making indefensible statements you resort to attacking your critic rather than responding to the criticism. Because you don't read replies properly and hence post dim statements I've already agreed with as if I hadn't. Someone who doesn't read replies yet comments back to them deserves criticism and not a little frustration. Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Which is a very Trumpian tactic. Hitler went further of course. He murdered them. I will post replies as I see fit, and should I choose to, and not at the behest of anyone else. You have no obligation to either read or respond. That is your choice. Well, that is your choice and if you refuse to stop posting at me I guess I have no choice to occasionally respond. However when individuals get a block facility you won't get that option and you can carry on being Wisbech with those that wish to engage you.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The topic was about Nazis being socialists. Introducing anything else is a diversion. Everything you post is a diversion.
|
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No not unlike Stalin or Mao, but as we weren't discussing them to introduce them is a diversion. So what if your not discussing them. It's a valid point, so answer it! Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.47pm)
|
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh I read and "understood" your reply perfectly well. What is obvious is that when called out for making indefensible statements you resort to attacking your critic rather than responding to the criticism. Which is a very Trumpian tactic. Hitler went further of course. He murdered them. I will post replies as I see fit, and should I choose to, and not at the behest of anyone else. You have no obligation to either read or respond. That is your choice.
And trumpian is how you behave e.g. arrogance, deflecting insults you've written like wierd people live in wisbech, thinking people read your posts and think your right, your constant reference to people who agree with you, Cornish farmers et Al, American trump fans.etc. but most of all your denial when pulled on something idiotic you have written. I'm starting to think you are Trump. Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.56pm) Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.58pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have no idea. It wasn't me to brought it up! Fine. So it’s nothing to do with you not wanting to accept any criticism of those whose political bias you endorse. Excellent. Glad to hear it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Because you don't read replies properly and hence post dim statements I've already agreed with as if I hadn't. Someone who doesn't read replies yet comments back to them deserves criticism and not a little frustration. Just because you think I don't read your replies properly, so regard them as "dim" doesn't mean I don't, or that they are! It means I disagree with them. If you had "already agreed" with anything it was so wrapped up in attempts at further justifications of your original claims as it be invisible. If you want to argue further I suggest you direct your criticisms to the Encyclopedia Britannica whose web site it came from, for it was their statements you were questioning and not mine. Well, that is your choice and if you refuse to stop posting at me I guess I have no choice to occasionally respond. However when individuals get a block facility you won't get that option and you can carry on being Wisbech with those that wish to engage you. I am not "posting at you". I am responding to comments I believe are erroneous and therefore misleading.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
And trumpian is how you behave e.g. arrogance, deflecting insults you've written like wierd people live in wisbech, thinking people read your posts and think your right, your constant reference to people who agree with you, Cornish farmers et Al, American trump fans.etc. but most of all your denial when pulled on something idiotic you have written. I'm starting to think you are Trump. Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.56pm) Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.58pm) I won't bother in telling you what I have discerned about your character. I think that most others, even those who share your political viewpoint, will have worked that out for themselves.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
You have to hand it to him, he really is astoundingly thick [Tweet Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Fine. So it’s nothing to do with you not wanting to accept any criticism of those whose political bias you endorse. Excellent. Glad to hear it. I don't endorse anyone who is a dictator, murderer or despot. What a silly idea! Yet another attempt at diversion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't endorse anyone who is a dictator, murderer or despot. What a silly idea! Yet another attempt at diversion. Diversion from what exactly? This thread has been pretty wide ranging but apparently has to conform to your boundaries. OK, how about you decide at the start of each thread which subjects are off limits just so everyone knows. Or better yet, you post Your wisdom and add a like button so everyone can agree with you and sit back in amazement at your grasp of geopolitical events.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.