This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
So you will be voting Labour this time now your party are fully behind it... and inside it.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
If they lost all those beds , have they thought about looking down the scrap merchants. If someone stole them that'd be the first place I'd check.
|
|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
and it could be thought by some that even a venerable cucking funt could be capable of being wrong twice a day sometimes.. Edited by legaleagle (02 Jun 2017 4.50pm) Hmmm. You'd have to go some way back before you found anything I posted where I was wrong, Rumpole. I feel you're deliberately wasting the court's time.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If they lost all those beds , have they thought about looking down the scrap merchants. If someone stole them that'd be the first place I'd check. I wouldn't expect you or your party to really take the NHS seriously.
|
|
|
I get it the beds were too high so they had to be lowered.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Just to point out we were never 'given' money under the Marshall Plan. It was a loan subject to 50 annual repayments. The Marshall plan was pan European, mainly used to keep European countries under American not Soviet influence.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
I get it the beds were too high so they had to be lowered.
Cucking was right.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The Marshall plan was pan European, mainly used to keep European countries under American not Soviet influence. And to rebuild economies to give the Americans someone to trade with. Whatever the reasons, Europe would have been f*cked without it. Clever Americans.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The Marshall plan was pan European, mainly used to keep European countries under American not Soviet influence. In case of confusion there were 2 the North America loan and later the Marshall plan. Gordon Brown paid it up in 2006. Labour chancellors try to repay debt as we know
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I wouldn't expect you or your party to really take the NHS seriously. All in this book. Most problems have been over exacerbated by the Tories, many Tory MPs have vested interests in Private heathcare.
You can't have it both ways. Also. Lots of name calling on here by various tossers.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Cucking was right. No the nurses were finding it too difficult to get capitalist fatties into bed so the beds had to be lowered to make it easier.
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Is steeleye off his medication?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
All in this book. Most problems have been over exacerbated by the Tories, many Tory MPs have vested interests in Private heathcare.
You can't have it both ways. In this instance, yes. Absolutely. I've not called you any names other than 'gusset', gusset. And even then, that was only when I was cross with you. I actually believe that you are an integral part of this site. A challenging opponent.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I wouldn't expect you or your party to really take the NHS seriously. In terms of pure data public spending on health the facts are: 1997: 4.73% of GDP Make of that what you will. Pure data though can be misleading. Also number of doctors per 1000 population: 1997: 1.85
2000 (earliest available): 9.01
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
In this instance, yes. Absolutely. I've not called you any names other than 'gusset', gusset. And even then, that was only when I was cross with you. I actually believe that you are an integral part of this site. A challenging opponent.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Tory attack ad misrepresents Corbyn views on IRA, says Labour. Widely shared video uses misleading edit of Corbyn’s interview on Sky News, cut to suggest he did not condemn bombing. Looks like its true and the part where Corbyn condemns all bombing is removed.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Jeremy not one to complain but this will have been circulated everywhere. Will it be traced directly to Tory HQ ??
|
|
|
It's the NHS itself that needs reforming, no matter how much money taxpayers chuck at it. How much does a staff nurse or a junior doctor earn? Not as much as one of these w@nkers, I'll be bound.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.