I still think some kind of deal is the most likely outcome, possibly a revised one despite the EU saying that isn't happening. I can't see us remaining, or there being a second vote, and have my doubts that we'll leave without a deal. Possibly new leadership might kick the process into early 2020 though.

Of course 'after' that, should we dare loon that far, if over the next couple of years things are going well, then support for what had happened would increase and it'd be smooth sailing. If on the other hand the economy tanks or something along those lines, public opinion may well align with a 'rejoin' or not General Election. Don't think you can escape the groundhog day Brexit process that easily.

Yes there could certainly be some truth to that too... I think the impact would be felt both for us and the EU. It could feasibly lead to a loose arrangement that makes more sense to all involved. There are so many unknowns, I've given up second guessing!

Apologies for coming over all DANGERCLOSE but this main lad choked me up a bit. All those saying ‘we survived the world wars’ but would run a mile from signing up should be made to watch this.

[Tweet Link]

I thought that we fought two world wars in order to stop becoming a united Europe

Interesting statement when 48% of people voted to stay in, which is probably a higher percentage now.

One thing that Brexit is not and never will be, on either side, is best for everyone.

Where we are now, leaving ASAP is the best outcome.

It would perhaps be reasonable to have another vote in 20 years when we see the impact of leaving, although I would imagine that any government would be reluctant to have another referendum ever.

Personally. I did not vote for economic reasons, so I am happy to remain out forever, no matter what.