This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by RyWa
Its completely true, they were apparently absolutely stunned that relegation existed as in the US its not a thing that happens in any type of Sport.
And there has been investment, look at the published financials. With FFP the Prem isn't a poker game, they can't just throw whatever money they have on the table. The big six made sure they were the last teams able to do that went they set up the new FFP rules. (And even they might get caught out). I should add there a MUCH stricter rules in North American sports that level the playing field between all teams. The Prem is much ore of a pay-to-play league. Even if they COULD put in loads of cash, there isn't much of a business case for it. 100 million would not take us top 6, which is the next step for making much more money, or even top half --look at Fulham and Wolves. Cash is no guarantee. If I was on their investment team, the plan would be to build up the pipeline (academy, grounds, stadium, scouting network, links with clubs in other leagues) as well as the value of the brand. All of which take considerable time. With FFP the Chelsea / ManCity route are closed, the only way to build a reliable top 8(?) team is the Spurs route, signing and training teenagers into stars worth tens of millions. Relegation possibility would be known and planned for. Short-term investment in the squad (1-3 years) would be to keep the team (ideally) safely out of the zone. Of course with limited transfer windows and injuries there is still risk. So if relegation happens you keep enough financial flexibility that with the parachute payments you spend big to get back up quickly (like Newcastle, Burnley, etc.) before the brand takes too big a hit. If you are down for more than the 3 years of the parachute payments, you sell and write it all off
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tyrelli
I’m slightly sceptical that investors putting tens of millions of pounds into something haven’t done due diligence and wouldn’t understand how the league worked. Very informative if very astonishing....leaves us very vulnerable in the short to medium term, that’s Palace for you!
|
|
| chateauferret |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Petereagle
Very informative if very astonishing....leaves us very vulnerable in the short to medium term, that’s Palace for you! It's also total horses***.
============ |
|
|
Originally posted by Petereagle
Very informative if very astonishing....leaves us very vulnerable in the short to medium term, that’s Palace for you! You can’t buy this bollocks surely? They were linked with buying a championship club before they bought us FFS.
|
|
|
No transfers today, let's just get on with enjoying rest of season
|
|
|
Originally posted by ThatPetrolRelation
And there has been investment, look at the published financials. With FFP the Prem isn't a poker game, they can't just throw whatever money they have on the table. The big six made sure they were the last teams able to do that went they set up the new FFP rules. (And even they might get caught out). I should add there a MUCH stricter rules in North American sports that level the playing field between all teams. The Prem is much ore of a pay-to-play league. Even if they COULD put in loads of cash, there isn't much of a business case for it. 100 million would not take us top 6, which is the next step for making much more money, or even top half --look at Fulham and Wolves. Cash is no guarantee. If I was on their investment team, the plan would be to build up the pipeline (academy, grounds, stadium, scouting network, links with clubs in other leagues) as well as the value of the brand. All of which take considerable time. With FFP the Chelsea / ManCity route are closed, the only way to build a reliable top 8(?) team is the Spurs route, signing and training teenagers into stars worth tens of millions. Relegation possibility would be known and planned for. Short-term investment in the squad (1-3 years) would be to keep the team (ideally) safely out of the zone. Of course with limited transfer windows and injuries there is still risk. So if relegation happens you keep enough financial flexibility that with the parachute payments you spend big to get back up quickly (like Newcastle, Burnley, etc.) before the brand takes too big a hit. If you are down for more than the 3 years of the parachute payments, you sell and write it all off
Hasn't stopped Wolves and Foolem spending a huge amount on players, or Bournemouth with almost £35 million this window on 2 players ? Whatever the ramifications for Palace it doesn't look on paper that it is working. Edited by Booted Eagle (31 Jan 2019 6.54pm)
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
|
Is op dazza about tonight or has he high tailed it back to his sauce ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Plaistow Eagle
We ain't buying anyone..!! Suggest Steve P believes we have enough and there are enough teams worse than us to stay up and that's all he's concerned about. Meantime the gravy train goes on with Dougie F continually getting his salary for delivering absolutely nothing. Mark Bright whispering in Steve P's ear - like he's some all seeing oracle - what is the Mark Bright thing all about? Just don't get it..!! Just another totally underwhelming transfer window. We're treading water at best..!! Personally I'm not too sure. Thd way thd results went last couple if days, and some of the transfer business bh other teams, fof ghe first time this seadon I'm seriously worried.I can't see Huddersfield getting out of trouble, and Cardiff will struggle(although they've spent a bit). I can see Fulham saints and Burnley winning games. Newcastle are playing well and have bought well......We're in a real battle.
|
|
|
Very concerned if no-one else is signed. Sky sports reporting that nothing is on the cards. With less than 4 hours to go it looks bleak.
|
|
|
Said it loads already but surely we have the money for a loan fee just to fill what we are lacking which is a midfielder or attacker how difficult is that ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by RyWa
Very concerned if no-one else is signed. Sky sports reporting that nothing is on the cards. With less than 4 hours to go it looks bleak. I agree. Lose to Fulham, a couple of season ending injuries to key players and Zaha’s ban being extended and we will be on the slide. With the lack of cover we have it really doesn’t make sense. Feel sorry for Roy. Needed to invest. Brinkmanship.
|
|
|
Originally posted by RyWa
Very concerned if no-one else is signed. Sky sports reporting that nothing is on the cards. With less than 4 hours to go it looks bleak. Tells you all need to know..!! Steve P's ego and lack of associated investment will cost us in the long run. I personally don't think it will be this season - but ultimately it will catch up with us. Don't get me wrong Steve P has overseen the most successful era for our Club. Rescuing us from going going out of existence and to where we are now and he should be rightfully/totally recognised for that. But his time is run and if we are going to continue at this level - he needs to step aside and let someone with sufficient resources/vision to take us forward. Then Steve P can sit back with his "Mate" Mark Bright and say look what I did..!!
|
|
|
Originally posted by fish mitten
I agree. Lose to Fulham, a couple of season ending injuries to key players and Zaha’s ban being extended and we will be on the slide. With the lack of cover we have it really doesn’t make sense. Feel sorry for Roy. Needed to invest. Brinkmanship. Really can’t see how anyone can feel sorry for Roy given his record of bringing in players and then not playing them, apart from Ayew obviously. Edited by pompeyeagle (31 Jan 2019 7.43pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by pompeyeagle
Really can’t see how anyone can feel sorry for Roy given his record of bringing in players and then not playing them, apart from Ayew obviously. How do you know that Roy brought in the players that he doesn't play as it sounds to me like someone else brought in players that he doesn't fancy
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
How do you know that Roy brought in the players that he doesn't play as it sounds to me like someone else brought in players that he doesn't fancy If you read the Mirror quotes, that would look to be the case - e.g. I've got three keepers.
|
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
If you read the Mirror quotes, that would look to be the case - e.g. I've got three keepers. Only useful if we can play 1-2-5-3 formation
|
|
|
Originally posted by Sportyteacher
Only useful if we can play 1-2-5-3 formation Forgot to add:...without Wilf!
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.