This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Inapickle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Charlie Croker
Dele Alli last week and now this one. Need to bring on some retrospective punishment OR tv reviews. ..exactly and the one for Spurs being the first goal allowed them the pleasure to go on and get more, really disgusting having one person being responsible for deciding the outcome of games that have many people worrying about their lively hood and affecting their behaviour/moods until the next time they play....all you need is one solitary person sitting on their hairy arse watching a screen with the ability to replay every incident in a split moment with an ear piece linked to the ref, take about 15 seconds I'd reckon, it is disgusting and today's ref needed help BIG time.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by geoff
About time they bought in retrospective bans for things like deliberate diving!!!! They could probably do something for bringing the game into disrepute if they wanted to but they don't
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Straight red for cheating, but ain't going to happen.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Inapickle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by travz
The dive for cabyes booking was just as bad. Hull should be embarrassed ..only the players responsible should be and they should be fined retrospectively and any bookings should be rescinded as result of incident, blatant cheating with fake pain as these two were need to be punished with huge fines and long bans.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Inapickle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by peterg
Just seen the replays. In the Alli decision, there was some contact with the defender, because Alli trailed his foot to make sure he went down. With Snodgrass there was no contact at all. How can a ref give a decision as bad as that, and as costly? What was he thinking? Edited by peterg (10 Dec 2016 4.02pm) ..Swansea were doing well keeping Spurs out up until that Pen, game should be replayed.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
chateauferret ![]() |
|
---|---|
The Dele Alli one I put in the same class as the one Benteke got against us when he was playing for the bin dippers. There was marginal contact but certainly not enough to be beyond doubt a foul, which is what's required for the decision. In the case of Snodgrass even at full speed you could clearly see daylight between him and any part of Delaney and the ref was right in line with it. There's nothing else happening to make Snodgrass fall theatrically onto the ground. One of the most obvious, most cynical, most shameful dives I've ever seen. He was on a yellow card which itself was long overdue and so clearly should be getting a second yellow and should be gone. He proceeds to commit a deliberate foul in his own box and still the ref doesn't send him off. Meanwhile he dishes out yellow cards to Punch, Wilf, McArthur for trivial infringements. An officiating performance of truly disgusting incompetence and which really makes one wonder what is the point.
============ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
..exactly and the one for Spurs being the first goal allowed them the pleasure to go on and get more, really disgusting having one person being responsible for deciding the outcome of games that have many people worrying about their lively hood and affecting their behaviour/moods until the next time they play....all you need is one solitary person sitting on their hairy arse watching a screen with the ability to replay every incident in a split moment with an ear piece linked to the ref, take about 15 seconds I'd reckon, it is disgusting and today's ref needed help BIG time. Im hoping that was a joke with the amount they get paid per week, if they get relegated they just move on and earn another £30 grand per week at another club
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by speediej
I dont know what you were watching but we were definitely not playing well I thought we were playing quite well.The appalling decision knocked us for 6
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Up until the Penalty we were not playing too badly, it definitely did knock our confidence defensively. That said though we have absolutely no pace in our back line which is causing us an issue. I see Snodgrass has come out and said it shouldn't have been a penalty now, funny how he failed to say that when he 'rode Dann's challenge' and the ref pointed to the spot.
"They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Riding the tackle, the tackle a good foot away from him
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The assistant ref had an excellent view - I wonder what influence he had on the ref's decision.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Inapickle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by merganser
The assistant ref had an excellent view - I wonder what influence he had on the ref's decision. ..probably confirmed it a foul.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.