This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 27 Nov 17 5.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Odd a royal wedding isn't classed as news
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
  Hrolf The Ganger  27 Nov 17 5.45pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Royal swinging?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| YT Oxford 27 Nov 17 6.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Anyway. ‘Would’
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Nov 17 6.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Good day to bury bad news... 1st 12 pages of the standard is full of the story
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 27 Nov 17 6.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by nickgusset
Good day to bury bad news... 1st 12 pages of the standard is full of the story As opposed to the usual sh*te in the standard then. I can’t believe anyone reads it!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| simlaboy coulsdon 27 Nov 17 6.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
WOW ,their offspring could have Ginger Afros , how cool is that , bit like that fella Yellowman
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mstrobez 27 Nov 17 6.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Guessing this'll be unpopular on the HOL. But f*** the Monarchy. 300 million a year of taxpayers money that is apparently only justifiable by "tourism". If people genuinely feel the tourism we gain solely from the royal family brings our economy up to a net gain, I'd really question their reasoning. I don't personally have any issues with the individuals. By all accounts Harry seems a decent enough chap and he didn't pick the life he has. But the institute itself is an insult to a civilised society in 2017 Britain.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 27 Nov 17 6.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Mstrobez
Guessing this'll be unpopular on the HOL. But f*** the Monarchy. 300 million a year of taxpayers money that is apparently only justifiable by "tourism". If people genuinely feel the tourism we gain solely from the royal family brings our economy up to a net gain, I'd really question their reasoning. I don't personally have any issues with the individuals. By all accounts Harry seems a decent enough chap and he didn't pick the life he has. But the institute itself is an insult to a civilised society in 2017 Britain. Easily beaten by Parliament but that's for another day i guess. Well done Harry and all the very best.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Nov 17 6.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Mstrobez
Guessing this'll be unpopular on the HOL. But f*** the Monarchy. 300 million a year of taxpayers money that is apparently only justifiable by "tourism". If people genuinely feel the tourism we gain solely from the royal family brings our economy up to a net gain, I'd really question their reasoning. I don't personally have any issues with the individuals. By all accounts Harry seems a decent enough chap and he didn't pick the life he has. But the institute itself is an insult to a civilised society in 2017 Britain.
Fair play for bringing a mixed race lady into the Royal lot. They don't bother me the Royals. I can't bear the fawning over them though.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
croydon proud  Any european country i fancy! 27 Nov 17 6.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Mstrobez
Guessing this'll be unpopular on the HOL. But f*** the Monarchy. 300 million a year of taxpayers money that is apparently only justifiable by "tourism". If people genuinely feel the tourism we gain solely from the royal family brings our economy up to a net gain, I'd really question their reasoning. I don't personally have any issues with the individuals. By all accounts Harry seems a decent enough chap and he didn't pick the life he has. But the institute itself is an insult to a civilised society in 2017 Britain.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mstrobez 27 Nov 17 6.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by nickgusset
Fair play for bringing a mixed race lady into the Royal lot. They don't bother me the Royals. I can't bear the fawning over them though. They wouldn't bother me if they genuinely did make sense from a financial point of view. But I simply cannot see how we'd lose £300m+ a year in "tourism" diminishing them. When immigrants, disabled people and single mothers get blamed for cancer treatment waiting lists and we apparently can't afford to fund public services adequately, that's when the institution winds me up. How much did we cut from Liz and co 2010 onwards?
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Nov 17 6.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'congratulations to HRH PRINCEWILLIAM !' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Mstrobez
They wouldn't bother me if they genuinely did make sense from a financial point of view. But I simply cannot see how we'd lose £300m+ a year in "tourism" diminishing them. When immigrants, disabled people and single mothers get blamed for cancer treatment waiting lists and we apparently can't afford to fund public services adequately, that's when the institution winds me up. How much did we cut from Liz and co 2010 onwards? And of course HRH was implemented in the Paradise papers...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.