You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 8 2026 5.40pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)


Page 205 of 261 < 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 >
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 12 Oct 23 4.52pm

The issue for many about the BBC, not calling Hamas a Terrorist organisation, is this not just a whim but the official policy of the UK government and other countries.

Whether that is a justified description or that others should also be called it is moot for the purposes of this topic, they are defined as that which is a fact which the BBC is so beloved of.

The BBC is always going on about being factual and yet it refuses to use the official designation passed by Parliament.

If however the BBC chooses not to use this because they want to be broadcaster to the world and not show favour then they should be reminded that they are the state broadcaster for this country, paid for by the taxpayers. If they want that much independence then abolish the licence fee and go your own way.

Edited by Badger11 (12 Oct 2023 4.56pm)

 


One more point

NE14T Flag 12 Oct 23 5.17pm

I suppose if they wanted to be correct and show their impartiality the BBC would say “ Hamas a designated terrorist organisation by the UK government”

It always goes back “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”

Hamas would argue that the world doesn’t take their plight seriously and no one does anything about the illegal occupation their land and the suppression of the Palestine people. They therefore have to take drastic action. Killing civilians however is not obviously the way although they would argue Israel has done that for years.

It’s all a bloody mess with both sides having committed atrocities over the years.

 


The beatings will stop when morale improves.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 12 Oct 23 5.23pm

Originally posted by NE14T

I suppose if they wanted to be correct and show their impartiality the BBC would say “ Hamas a designated terrorist organisation by the UK government”

It always goes back “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”

Hamas would argue that the world doesn’t take their plight seriously and no one does anything about the illegal occupation their land and the suppression of the Palestine people. They therefore have to take drastic action. Killing civilians however is not obviously the way although they would argue Israel has done that for years.

It’s all a bloody mess with both sides having committed atrocities over the years.

Can you remind me when Israel beheaded babies, killed children in front of their parents, raped women before killing them and burned people alive?

 

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 12 Oct 23 6.11pm

Originally posted by georgenorman

Can you remind me when Israel beheaded babies, killed children in front of their parents, raped women before killing them and burned people alive?

can you remind me when Hamas flew helicopter gunships dropping phosphorous weapons onto a suburb ? where the kids sleep....

there is no moral high-ground in that War. There is Wrong on all sides.

[Link]

Edited by PalazioVecchio (12 Oct 2023 6.13pm)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 12 Oct 23 9.31pm

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

can you remind me when Hamas flew helicopter gunships dropping phosphorous weapons onto a suburb ? where the kids sleep....

there is no moral high-ground in that War. There is Wrong on all sides.

[Link]

Edited by PalazioVecchio (12 Oct 2023 6.13pm)

Claims.

I repeat, can you remind me when Israel beheaded babies, killed children in front of their parents, raped women before killing them and burned people alive?

Israel are responding to the attacks by Hamas.

Edited by georgenorman (12 Oct 2023 9.36pm)

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 12 Oct 23 10.06pm

Originally posted by NE14T

I suppose if they wanted to be correct and show their impartiality the BBC would say “ Hamas a designated terrorist organisation by the UK government”

It always goes back “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”

Hamas would argue that the world doesn’t take their plight seriously and no one does anything about the illegal occupation their land and the suppression of the Palestine people. They therefore have to take drastic action. Killing civilians however is not obviously the way although they would argue Israel has done that for years.

It’s all a bloody mess with both sides having committed atrocities over the years.

That’s pretty much what they do. They make no excuses for terrorist acts but don’t classify people in their own voice. They report how others classify them.

That way they can maintain their strict impartiality.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 12 Oct 23 10.17pm

Originally posted by Badger11

The issue for many about the BBC, not calling Hamas a Terrorist organisation, is this not just a whim but the official policy of the UK government and other countries.

Whether that is a justified description or that others should also be called it is moot for the purposes of this topic, they are defined as that which is a fact which the BBC is so beloved of.

The BBC is always going on about being factual and yet it refuses to use the official designation passed by Parliament.

If however the BBC chooses not to use this because they want to be broadcaster to the world and not show favour then they should be reminded that they are the state broadcaster for this country, paid for by the taxpayers. If they want that much independence then abolish the licence fee and go your own way.

Edited by Badger11 (12 Oct 2023 4.56pm)

That they are defined by the government as a terrorist organisation is routinely reported by the BBC. That is indeed a fact.

They won’t do so in their own voice. The BBC, thank goodness, are not a spokesperson for any government and to maintain impartiality and trust, even when reporting on the most heinous of atrocities, they won’t label the perpetrators. They allow us to reach our own conclusions.

There are lots of people here who neither like or, in my view, truly understand the role and purpose of, the BBC. They would like to reduce them to be just another broadcaster.

I disagree. I believe they are one of our very few remaining stand out examples of us leading the world.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 12 Oct 23 10.18pm

Originally posted by silvertop

Notwithstanding what I said above, the problem with Hamas is they were elected. Thus, it was (past tense) difficult to describe them as terrorists if they were also duly elected representatives for their people. It is wholly counter to the definition of that word to describe an elected body as terrorists. Thus, if you describe them as terrorists, you MUST also describe Israel as the same, given they murder hundreds of innocent - but "acceptable collateral" - Palestinians every year. It is a murky area.

That said, their conduct and constitution has altered all that to the extent that the UK has had to formally designated them as such.

Nevertheless, it stuns me that many posters on here are genuinely of the view that the only good Arab/Muslim is a dead one. I find those views appalling and have a great deal of sympathy with the Palestinian people who have been robbed and exiled and then repeatedly kicked while down.

However, my sympathy does not extend to Hamas. Not just through their conduct, but by their desire to murder millions of Israelis and then set up a brutal, theocratic dictatorship.

The trouble is, I do not know how to wipe them off the face of the map without murdering countless innocents. It is certainly not by the methods adopted by the current murderous, failed, Israeli government whose blood lust will cause awful consequent events to ripple through history. All this while the West sits in the sidelines cheering them on, oblivious to the consequences.

Edited by silvertop (12 Oct 2023 4.48pm)

Edited by silvertop (12 Oct 2023 4.49pm)

Hamas may have been elected but that was back in 2006 and there haven’t been elections since (I think that is correct). So back in 2006 Hamas may have been a good choice for the electorate but if they haven’t had a chance to vote them out since then Hamas could have morphed into something else. Rather like the EEC morphing into the EU and the electorate not being given a chance to object…

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 13 Oct 23 8.21am

Usual stuff about BBC 'impartiality' from the usual suspects. Will not 'label' terrorists, but never hesitate to label many groups critical of left wing causes as 'far right'.

 

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 13 Oct 23 9.15am

Originally posted by georgenorman

Claims.

I repeat, can you remind me when Israel beheaded babies, killed children in front of their parents, raped women before killing them and burned people alive?

Israel are responding to the attacks by Hamas.

Edited by georgenorman (12 Oct 2023 9.36pm)

ah yes. Like two kids fighting in a playground telling the teacher ''he started it, he hit me''

You implement 'and eye for an eye' and you create a World of blind people. The Middle-East.....there are fv..ckers fighting on both sides. And each side is feeding revenge from the other side.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (13 Oct 2023 9.19am)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

silvertop Flag Portishead 13 Oct 23 12.12pm

Originally posted by georgenorman

So was Hitler.

If you/they don't want to call them terrorists, how about war criminals.

You only read the first line didn't you? Too long?

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 13 Oct 23 12.16pm

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

Hamas may have been elected but that was back in 2006 and there haven’t been elections since (I think that is correct). So back in 2006 Hamas may have been a good choice for the electorate but if they haven’t had a chance to vote them out since then Hamas could have morphed into something else. Rather like the EEC morphing into the EU and the electorate not being given a chance to object…

Not you too! Pretty much what I said if you read the whole post (although I am not biting on the Brexit analogy).

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 13 Oct 23 2.00pm

Originally posted by silvertop

You only read the first line didn't you? Too long?

Yes, far too long.

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Oct 23 3.33pm

Originally posted by georgenorman

Usual stuff about BBC 'impartiality' from the usual suspects. Will not 'label' terrorists, but never hesitate to label many groups critical of left wing causes as 'far right'.

You might like to read this:-

[Link]

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Spiderman Flag Horsham 13 Oct 23 6.43pm

Just looked on BBC news website. Cannot see any headlines regarding the stabbing in France. You can, however, read what life is like in the Gaza Strip

Found it, on the Europe page, thought it might warrant front page but hey ho

Edited by Spiderman (13 Oct 2023 6.48pm)

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 13 Oct 23 6.46pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You might like to read this:-

[Link]

Has the same owners as the New Statesman

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Oct 23 9.31pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Has the same owners as the New Statesman

So what?

It’s a specialist magazine covering media issues. The data it reports comes from academic studies and a YouGov survey. What these show is that my perception of the BBC being impartial is much more widely held than the perception that it has a left wing bias. A perception which is stated as a fact by many here.

All this shows is what is really obvious. That the majority of users of this section are wildly unrepresentative of the population as a whole. This is just one of the places where they can confirm their own biases and convince themselves that everyone thinks as they do. They don’t.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

silvertop Flag Portishead 14 Oct 23 11.51am

Originally posted by Spiderman

Just looked on BBC news website. Cannot see any headlines regarding the stabbing in France. You can, however, read what life is like in the Gaza Strip

Found it, on the Europe page, thought it might warrant front page but hey ho

Edited by Spiderman (13 Oct 2023 6.48pm)

Fully reported in all bulitens yesterday as a terrorist incident.

 

Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 14 Oct 23 4.33pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That they are defined by the government as a terrorist organisation is routinely reported by the BBC. That is indeed a fact.

They won’t do so in their own voice. The BBC, thank goodness, are not a spokesperson for any government and to maintain impartiality and trust, even when reporting on the most heinous of atrocities, they won’t label the perpetrators. They allow us to reach our own conclusions.

There are lots of people here who neither like or, in my view, truly understand the role and purpose of, the BBC. They would like to reduce them to be just another broadcaster.

I disagree. I believe they are one of our very few remaining stand out examples of us leading the world.

In fairness, I cannot see that the BBC are reporting that the attack on the convoy was carried out by Israel, whereas Sky are calling it an Israeli attack. Israel is saying it is investigating the situation but it wasn’t concentrating on that area and also that Hamas had been mining roads. Take your pick as to who is guilty.

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Oct 23 10.26pm

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

In fairness, I cannot see that the BBC are reporting that the attack on the convoy was carried out by Israel, whereas Sky are calling it an Israeli attack. Israel is saying it is investigating the situation but it wasn’t concentrating on that area and also that Hamas had been mining roads. Take your pick as to who is guilty.

It's unlikely that Hamas are mining busy roads that have their own people on them.

I suppose you could take the line that they are killing their own people deliberately but it's probably not the case.

Once the Israeli armour comes in and the streets are a battleground I imagine they will start mining.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Oct 2023 10.27pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Page 205 of 261 < 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)