You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Female Dr Who?
November 8 2026 6.28pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Female Dr Who?


Page 23 of 23 << First< 19 20 21 22 23
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 22 Aug 17 6.17pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

And get to live a more selfish lifestyle yet pass it off as a virtue.....using points that are nonsensical.

Is there anything more selfish than deciding that the world absolutely must have more "you"?

Also, thanks for the judgment of how I live my life without a single clue as to how I actually do. It puts into perspective the basis in fact of all of your other opinions that are dotted about this board like pats in a cow field.

Ray in Houston childless? Selfish t***.
Dick Gregory...never heard of him. Can't be important.

And on and on. It's a very, very clear pattern.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Stirlingsays Flag 22 Aug 17 6.29pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

Is there anything more selfish than deciding that the world absolutely must have more "you"?

Also, thanks for the judgment of how I live my life without a single clue as to how I actually do. It puts into perspective the basis in fact of all of your other opinions that are dotted about this board like pats in a cow field.

Ray in Houston childless? Selfish t***.
Dick Gregory...never heard of him. Can't be important.

And on and on. It's a very, very clear pattern.

If your parents had used the same logic as you then you wouldn't be here. How terrible of them to use up resources that other kids could have used eh? Bah!

The basis of me regarding the decision making motivation as selfish is what I'd call an 'educated leap'. I could be wrong of course but I've come across this situation and spoken opinion several times before...especially in professionals and I simply compare you to them....Like I say, I could be wrong but I doubt it.

Your summary of how I feel about your decision as selfish and Gregory as not really worthy of much note is about right....though I don't regard you with any dislike as the comment implies. I don't know you for that. I'm just calling a spade a spade based on what I know.

Forums are full of opinions. Don't be surprised if you run into ones you don't like.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Aug 17 6.33pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Existence has no meaning, no one has importance, we're all just a transient consciousness, that exists as a brief flash of existence in a vast and uncaring cosmos - You, me, our relationships, our children, everything we do, say and achieve are fundamentally meaningless.

We're probably just acting out of biological driven habits to reproduce, like every other species, for reasons we don't understand. And even those of us who choose not to have kids, are probably doing so because of a biological imperative that we don't understand (possibly to take certain genes and traits out of the line).

Existence with children, is as meaningless as existence with children.

I'm talking about self-importance and selfishness as opposed to being less important than your children. In existential terms, nothing is important, or so it might appear. Of course, we don't know the end game of existence, so the relative importance of anything is unknown and at the same time as important as the importance we wish to attach to it. Any one event in the grand scheme might be relatively unimportant or meaningless but that is really just in the eye of the sentient beholder if the universe is a self-organising phenomenon with an as yet unknown outcome. That is too complex a discussion to have here.
As biological entities, most have a preconditioned desire to reproduce and nurture and in that sense, it is as important as anything we do. By having no children it is possible that one's life will seem meaningless, which brings me back to my original point.

 

johnno42000 Flag 22 Aug 17 6.40pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Did I hear right? Bradley Walsh to be new assistant!

See what you started

I can't believe he's the new assistant. I'm not sure if there has been many, if any, actors playing the Doctors assistant that are older than the actor playing the Doctor. Very strange.

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Page 23 of 23 << First< 19 20 21 22 23

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Female Dr Who?