You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic
November 13 2026 6.39am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Wan Bissaka thread (LOCKED)


Page 24 of 64 < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 >
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 19 4.57pm

Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle

Wan-Bissaka wants to go.

If you're not happy, harrass him on Twitter instead of being a sulky girlie on here.

Because a newspaper says so?

He has a three year contract.

 

eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 13 Jun 19 4.59pm

Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle

Wan-Bissaka wants to go.

If you're not happy, harrass him on Twitter instead of being a sulky girlie on here.

I cant wait for the season to start, so the real slanging matches can start

Edited by eagleman13 (13 Jun 2019 5.00pm)

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 13 Jun 19 5.15pm

Originally posted by Dannyh.V2

Opinions are like Assholes everyone has them, and some stink.

My opinion, is that is we will get labelled as a selling club and never be anything else. AWB is a young lad with the world (literally) at his feet. At this stage in his career I think going to a big club would stifle his development, but I'm guessing the big bucks are calling.

However as per every season we have been in the prem, we will be last off the blocks in the window, probably sell AWB for 50 million on deadline day, and leave ourselves short of a decent right back, or end up paying over the odds for a replacement or make do with Kelly at right back until the Jan window.

Typical Palace transfer activity awaits is my gut feeling. The media dept at Palace pushing Sortloth did nothing to quell my fears, nor did Luka turning down his offer.

Edited by Dannyh.V2 (13 Jun 2019 2.06pm)

i dont think a move to united would stifle his career...he will be 1st choice RB at the club, if it was liverpool or citeh with TAA or walker infront of you i would agree.

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Casual Flag Orpington 13 Jun 19 5.18pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Like what?

Goals. F*cking boring watching most of the home games last season, without seeing many goals.

 

Casual Flag Orpington 13 Jun 19 5.20pm

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

i dont think a move to united would stifle his career...he will be 1st choice RB at the club, if it was liverpool or citeh with TAA or walker infront of you i would agree.

I couldn’t give a monkeys if it does stifle his career. Let’s take the money, buy a goal scorer , then buy him back for peanuts if he fails like Zaha did, or have a big sell on fee when he moves on to Barcelona. Win win.

 

Master Coin Flag 13 Jun 19 6.11pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

OK. Let's cut through the crap.

Are you seriously telling me that you would rather have money in the bank than seeing one of the best talents we have produced turn out in a Palace shirt?

A yes or no answer.


Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Jun 2019 4.27pm)

The one place this money isn't going is 'in the bank'. Either it will be used to invest in replacements to reinforce the squad or it will be used to pay off loans to avoid yet another administration.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 19 6.56pm

Originally posted by Casual

Goals. F*cking boring watching most of the home games last season, without seeing many goals.

If you could find a 20 goal a season striker for 30 million and pay his wages then great, but you need to defend as well as attack and our defence is already in need of reinforcement.
It's just not that easy to buy quality players.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 19 7.02pm

Originally posted by Master Coin

The one place this money isn't going is 'in the bank'. Either it will be used to invest in replacements to reinforce the squad or it will be used to pay off loans to avoid yet another administration.

A figure of speech.

Firstly, we will not go into administration.

Second, you will not improve the first eleven with 50 million unless you spend it on one player, a striker.
In that scenario, we might score more but we will concede more if Ward plays.

 

Portuguese Flag Porto 13 Jun 19 7.04pm

Simply as that: If someone wants him it's easy pay £60M.

 


1861 Football Club

FPL

Casual Flag Orpington 13 Jun 19 7.38pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

If you could find a 20 goal a season striker for 30 million and pay his wages then great, but you need to defend as well as attack and our defence is already in need of reinforcement.
It's just not that easy to buy quality players.

I agree it’s not that easy to buy quality players. But wed have had change from £50 million for what we paid for Tompkins, Sakho and the new keeper.
20 goal a season striker? I’d be happy with double figures.

 

Foxy0208 Flag Blackpool 13 Jun 19 7.53pm

I really don't want to lose AWB but if someone offers the price we have stated and given that the rumour is he wants to go, then I don't think we could turn the deal down.

My only worry is what sort of message this sends to Wilf?

If someone did then offer the asking price for Wilf we could be faced with losing both of them and if we sell AWB but tell Wilf he can't go we risk having a very unhappy player on our hands.

Personally I hope Utd don't increase their offer and we keep them both.

 


Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I don't like that attitude. I can assure them it is much more serious than that.

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 13 Jun 19 8.29pm

Originally posted by JohnB

As explained before, the net transfer spend was £40m but only about £10 of that would have been recognised in those accounts as the value is ammortised over the duration of a contract. We are not running at a profit and are being propped up by director loans.

Yep. He did mention us still paying for previous transfers. But they are not small suns. We’re talking about Benteke and Sakho. Crippling us.

 


COYP

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 13 Jun 19 8.34pm

Originally posted by Foxy0208

I really don't want to lose AWB but if someone offers the price we have stated and given that the rumour is he wants to go, then I don't think we could turn the deal down.

My only worry is what sort of message this sends to Wilf?

If someone did then offer the asking price for Wilf we could be faced with losing both of them and if we sell AWB but tell Wilf he can't go we risk having a very unhappy player on our hands.

Personally I hope Utd don't increase their offer and we keep them both.

This is my concern. It could really mess Wilf’s head up thinking he’s been here so long and AWB has gone at the right time and succeeded.

 


COYP

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 13 Jun 19 8.36pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

A figure of speech.

Firstly, we will not go into administration.

Second, you will not improve the first eleven with 50 million unless you spend it on one player, a striker.
In that scenario, we might score more but we will concede more if Ward plays.


If we can’t find a right back and striker for £50 million then we really do have problems. It might not of course be that much because there’s wages to cover, although you could add the planned budget to it, but fvck me, is AWB the only right back in Europe able to defend that area of the pitch? Jesus C.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (13 Jun 2019 8.38pm)

 


COYP

Invalid user 2019 Flag 13 Jun 19 8.56pm

It's getting hot in here!

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 19 9.04pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman


If we can’t find a right back and striker for £50 million then we really do have problems. It might not of course be that much because there’s wages to cover, although you could add the planned budget to it, but fvck me, is AWB the only right back in Europe able to defend that area of the pitch? Jesus C.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (13 Jun 2019 8.38pm)

No, but he is probably the best right back this club has ever had and money will not replace him, Anyone we can sign will not be as good.
My interest is seeing the club progress, not revert to a selling club as we have been in the past.

 

bashy2 Flag London 13 Jun 19 9.10pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

No, but he is probably the best right back this club has ever had and money will not replace him, Anyone we can sign will not be as good.
My interest is seeing the club progress, not revert to a selling club as we have been in the past.

we ain't a selling club we haven't sold anyone since 2016 we can't turn down 50 million for a player that came though our youth ranks and for that amount of money I would bit your arm off just hope it's reinvested in to the team

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 19 9.23pm

Originally posted by bashy2

we ain't a selling club we haven't sold anyone since 2016 we can't turn down 50 million for a player that came though our youth ranks and for that amount of money I would bit your arm off just hope it's reinvested in to the team

OK so according to a number of fans, football is now about making a big profit on players and not about actually winning matches.

I am now tired of saying that all the money in the world is useless if you can't attract players who are better than your first eleven.

 

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 13 Jun 19 11.15pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

OK so according to a number of fans, football is now about making a big profit on players and not about actually winning matches.

I am now tired of saying that all the money in the world is useless if you can't attract players who are better than your first eleven.

Every club has to do this apart from Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus and Man City, especially anyone outside of the big 6.

The last big fee player we sold in his prime was Bolasie. Murray doesn’t count because of age and a bad opinion made on his ability then and in the future.

I’d be more concerned if we sold Sakho tbh. We missed him a lot when he was out, and because we were so lacking in ideas of who to buy instead of Sakho and Freedman I’m far from convinced with, I dread to think who Sakho’s replacement might be.

Losing our best ever right back isn’t great news but it’s a very manageable decision and one that can be for the bigger picture and actually improve more parts on the pitch.

This has been going on and inevitable for decades. It doesn’t change now because of Prem money and the competition being even fiercer in it.

 


COYP

Mwncisee Flag Middlesbrough 13 Jun 19 11.16pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

OK so according to a number of fans, football is now about making a big profit on players and not about actually winning matches.

I am now tired of saying that all the money in the world is useless if you can't attract players who are better than your first eleven.

Feeling's mutual.

 

Page 24 of 64 < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic