It's got nothing to do with Trump's objective; he's just a reality game show host who's accidentally got to be President and is running with it. He never believed he'd win!

This is about Robert Mercer and his stooge from Brietbart, Steve Bannon. All this is available information. Mercer owns the most successful hedge fund of all time, he has more money than just about anyone, and wants to turn the US into a cleptocracy like Russia. He wants power without responsibility or the interference of an electorate, just like Putin.

Look up Carl Icahn, another of Trump's "special advisers" or Stephen Miller; these guys have all been brought into the fold and have been found wanting, for whatever reason, and booted out.

Trump hasn't been treated with bias, he hasn't yet been treated for what he is. A fool.

I used to be immortal

How so?

And you'll savour every moment!

Their economy is already f***ed.

And as for Trump. or any POTUS for that matter, it's not their decision alone so sleep easy.

Buy Litecoin.

You have this totally wrong!

Don Junior met a Russian civilian for dirt on Hillary, got nothing and paid nothing. Gleefully reported by every news outlet.

Meanwhile, Hillary has blamed her defeat in the election on Russia interference in dozens of interviews since Trump won. Widely reported by every news outlet.

Now it emerges that Hillary and the DNC paid millions of dollars to a foreign government in Russia for dirt on Trump and got a dossier. Huge difference here. Treason anyone? This story has been buried by the media.

All the while the media, over almost a year, have been pushing Hillary's narrative that Trump won the election because he colluded with the Russians. No evidence has been found for this, yet the anti-Trump media is happy to go along with the DNC and Hillary's story.

After trying to put Trump in bed with the Russians, the finger now points at her. Rather ironic.

Well I wouldn't write that off, given that there have been grand juries convened and the FBI are investigating quite a few people. Its a bit more serious than 'buying a dossier' because its clearly established that a) there are links between Trump's election campaign party / confidants are Russian agents b) That Russian hackers were complicit in cyber attacks and social media targeting in favour of Trump c) that members of Trumps election team and supporters have lied about connections with Russia.

But if the Clintons have committed similar breaches, then they should also be held accountable. That they are alleged to have bought a dossier deserves investigation - And the FBI were investigating Hilary at the time of the election and were happy to announce that they were may have cost her the election.

Of course Trump might be clear, he might not have been involved, but it does seem clearly that there were very questionable connections between Russian 'Diplomats' (aka Spies) and Trumps inner circle.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

The Simpsons predicted President Trump.

I was waiting for Adam West to become major....guess that's impossible now.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Even Tetsuo in full end-game giant blob mode would be a better Olympic mascot that the one-eyed trouser snake we came up with for London 2012.

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

"If you only use a selective source, or number of them, you'll get selective reporting." That is rubbish! If you select random stories, you select them even handedly.

I do use the BBC website and that too has anti-Trump and anti-Bexit bias. It's harder to argue on some days whether the order of importance of their stories on the homepage are justified. Certainly anti-Democrat stuff gets buried and anti-Trump stuff is pushed higher up the pecking order and it happens more often. But it's harder to monitor as the home page changes regularly throughout the day, unlike the YouTube page where it's obvious.

Living in the UK, I always felt that Obama was this fantastic president because we never really got any negative stories on him by MSM. Speaking to people in the US and doing my own research, I can see that it's a very different story. Again, how many negative storied on him can you find? MSM certainly has an agenda.

I like consuming video content and use YouTube every day for a variety of different subjects, music, news, entertainment. I find it easy to navigate and see short clips on what's happening and subscribe to many media outlets. If the BBC wants to promote its content through social media channels, then it must still adopt fair reporting. Forget the bias story selections, even its reporting on Trump is bad. Another reason why I mention its YouTube channel is because it's very easy to view the story choice at a glance and stories can't be hidden. I don't need to spend hours a week trawling their various TV and radio channels making notes on bias – its all their to see.

OK, let's agree on selective reporting here then. It's not their job to do that. They are supposed to have no political bias. I look forward to seeing your tally of anti-Dem stories!

And the Mike Pence story is simply a non story. It has been written in order to make Pence look stupid or ignorant and another example of MSM trying to undermine the Trump administration.

Another intelligent post!