You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Is It Time For Roy To Go, Yes or NO
November 13 2026 7.01am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Is It Time For Roy To Go, Yes or NO


Page 27 of 34 < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 >
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 13 Jul 20 1.44pm

Originally posted by Willo

Well, I have not heard such sentiments expressed publicly for the benefit of the media.

Steve Parish said that being in the Premier League was '' ground zero '' for Palace.

That was 18 months ago, I doubt it's changed

 


Old, Ungifted and White

doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 13 Jul 20 1.52pm

Originally posted by ambrose7

For me, the tipping point was when McCarthy came on when McArthur was injured.

We're 1-0 down at a club in the bottom 3 who have a shocking defensive record. What on earth was McCarthy going to bring to the table? I can't think of a single moment of attacking football from him this season.

If Meyer isn't going to be used in that situation, then there is absolutely no point us having an even vaguely creative player at the club.

If there's no point having an even vaguely creative player at the club, a club which has scored the second fewest goals in the league, what's the point of anyone turning up? We're just praying for a clean sheet and for someone to score a wonder goal.

I may be wrong but I think there was one. Didn't play the ball that launched to counter-attack that got us a draw at Citeh?

I'm not disagreeing with your comment of his coming on at half-time. At least Jairo and Max got a few more minutes this time. Perhaps they may get a whole half between them soon!

Edited by doombear (13 Jul 2020 1.56pm)

 

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 13 Jul 20 2.37pm

Cash strapped by Sakho, Benteke and Zaha’s wages some say. Well, we could have sold Wilf last year, didn’t. We could have got rid of Benteke, offered him a new contract instead. We could have sold Sakho after Cahill was bought in but didn’t.

If we are so cash strapped why didn’t we do any of the above? Instead we loan two of our centre forwards out, one of them on a stupid loan deal.

We buy a couple of youngsters and we say we also have a couple of decent other youngsters, but we don’t play them. We know we only have one choice at right back and left back but do nothing about it. We have elderly players that break down regularly throughout the season. I think we might have got one full season combined out of Tomkins, Schlupp, Kelly and Sakho.

Why has all this happened or not happened? Because Roy is the manager and he likes old school players who play exactly to his play book. If you don’t confirm you will not get on the pitch. As the Borg would say, “resistance is futile”. Well I for one think we need a few kids out there willing to run their buns off and show a bit of flair before we are buried by our turgid defensive nonsense that is now being found out.

Thanks Roy for keeping us up. Time to move on. Parish, sell Wilf and find another £50m and give all the money to the new manager. This current team is not good enough to stay in the Premier League.

 

Den1923 Flag 13 Jul 20 3.31pm

Originally posted by thai-eagle

With 3 workhorses in midfield (Koyuate, Luka, MacArthur) all more or less incapable of playing an "opening pass" to the front men, what to expect?
If the manager put out the same team vs United, I just think he has lost the plot.
And why why why not throw in a youngster (or two), start with players comfortable on the ball (ex Riedewald) and at least try to play some decent football.


That is exactly what Norwich tried to do and look what happened to them!

 

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 13 Jul 20 3.47pm

Out of curiosity why a special mention for Chris Powell?

I cannot see anything in his managerial career that puts him as a candidate for other than an assistant manager role perhaps being mentored to take over from someone.

Originally posted by NEILLO

If the Manager's job at Palace became available, I can assure you that there would be no shortage of applicants ( maybe including Chris Powell ) but getting the right candidate will be very tricky.

I agree with your comment about the business - why the rush to extend a one year contract, why not leave it until the season has concluded and not base a decision on performance for two thirds of that ? I suspect Roy didn't have any other offers on the table !

Edited by HKOwen (13 Jul 2020 3.50pm)

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 13 Jul 20 3.49pm

Originally posted by Den1923


That is exactly what Norwich tried to do and look what happened to them!

Hmm, in Farke's three seasons they've hardly spent any money and their net spend is -50m.

They got promoted playing excellent football and didn't strengthen. They have made it clear they were expecting relegation this season. So I doubt it is all about their playing style.

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

EddieMac Flag 13 Jul 20 3.50pm

Originally posted by Den1923


That is exactly what Norwich tried to do and look what happened to them!

If Norwich had of attempted to play like us then they may have stayed up. That manager should have been sacked 6 months ago while they were still in with a chance. Madness that he just kept sending him out to be battered week in and out. I couldn't understand it.

 

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 13 Jul 20 3.53pm

Originally posted by Den1923


That is exactly what Norwich tried to do and look what happened to them!

They tried to do it with championship level players taking a step up. They hardly spent a penny and as a result they ended up with about 5 or 6 who managed the step up and the rest didn’t. You cannot compare Norwich with any other team in the PL . All credit to them that despite their deficiencies they stuck to their guns and played some attractive stuff.

 

Den1923 Flag 13 Jul 20 4.03pm

Originally posted by cryrst

This is virtually the same squad we've had for 4 years. They can play a different way. Why they arnt is down to tactics. Dont concede for 70 mins. Catch one on the break. Problem being we cant do that breakaway goal if we are trying not to go 2 down.
Luka has not lost his ability as he is a good player. Why he isnt showing it is down to tactics.
He used to be an attacking midfielder. Breaks up play gets forward shoots some times, well he used to and that's one example. If roy thinks they havent got the legs then put a couple of hungry young players on the pitch. Nothing to lose apart from a game which is what we are doing anyway.

This is not Roy's fault, he has asked for support in the last few transfer windows and has got nothing to speak of. This squad has limited ability and Roy is playing the best tactics to suite what talent he has got to select from. It's been obvious to most on here that we have had a striker, Right back and an attacking midfielder problem for most of the time Roy has been here, he has done a good job in keeping us up, look what was going to happen if FdV had been left in situ. The current squad is full of players that previous Managers have sourced and when they did not get the money to spend anymore they threw the toys out the pram and walked. I accept that the current run is not acceptable but as Willo has eloquently said the run of fixtures played at the rate they are currently coming is going to have an effect on an aged squad especially when played in summer conditions. They lack match fitness because of the C-19 effect has had on training and playing time. The board have to accept that if they want to maximise the clubs value we have to be in the PL, therefore Parish/Freeman have to get moving now or as soon as the window opens and find the 3/4 players we need in order to help Roy get us through to safety at the end of next season, whilst at the sametime looking for the options they have to replace Roy at the end of next season. Sadly our u23 side seem to not have the quality to step up being 2nd bottom of that modest league having scored only 27 goals all season.

 

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 13 Jul 20 4.06pm

Originally posted by EddieMac

If Norwich had of attempted to play like us then they may have stayed up. That manager should have been sacked 6 months ago while they were still in with a chance. Madness that he just kept sending him out to be battered week in and out. I couldn't understand it.

They have a different philosophy at Norwich. They were prepared for the drop as soon as they were promoted. They are dictated by their financial model which is successful but means they will continue to hover between the two leagues unless they get a cash injection.

Perhaps their fans and their chairman prefer them playing the way they do despite the outcome.

 

doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 13 Jul 20 4.15pm

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

They have a different philosophy at Norwich. They were prepared for the drop as soon as they were promoted. They are dictated by their financial model which is successful but means they will continue to hover between the two leagues unless they get a cash injection.

Perhaps their fans and their chairman prefer them playing the way they do despite the outcome.


Like us they've had 4 promotions and 4 relegations, but at least they try to play football.

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Jul 20 4.16pm

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

They have a different philosophy at Norwich. They were prepared for the drop as soon as they were promoted. They are dictated by their financial model which is successful but means they will continue to hover between the two leagues unless they get a cash injection.

Perhaps their fans and their chairman prefer them playing the way they do despite the outcome.

Their 'Net spend' this season has been a meagre £6 Mill.
When they were last in the PL, season 2015-16 their 'Net spend' was £23 Mill.They went down that season as they have this season.

 

southnorwoodhill Flag 13 Jul 20 4.17pm

I really don't buy the "poor Roy, he's had no funds, he's adapted the tactics to the squad available" BS. As manager of England he had the cream of the crop from which to select, because of his tactics he turned what looked a fairly decent team on paper into a laughing stock. Roy Hodgson is the problem, stop making excuses for his negativity. Kane on corners? Need a goal? McCarthy for McArthur? Should be given a fond farewell and move on.

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Jul 20 4.25pm

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

I really don't buy the "poor Roy, he's had no funds, he's adapted the tactics to the squad available" BS. As manager of England he had the cream of the crop from which to select, because of his tactics he turned what looked a fairly decent team on paper into a laughing stock. Roy Hodgson is the problem, stop making excuses for his negativity. Kane on corners? Need a goal? McCarthy for McArthur? Should be given a fond farewell and move on.

Kane was the player with the best delivery.
Hodgson tried other players but they just didn't have the quality of delivery which Kane possessed so it was thought that this gave England a better chance of scoring.

 

Den1923 Flag 13 Jul 20 4.27pm

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

I really don't buy the "poor Roy, he's had no funds, he's adapted the tactics to the squad available" BS. As manager of England he had the cream of the crop from which to select, because of his tactics he turned what looked a fairly decent team on paper into a laughing stock. Roy Hodgson is the problem, stop making excuses for his negativity. Kane on corners? Need a goal? McCarthy for McArthur? Should be given a fond farewell and move on.

I disagree, he has kept us in the PL with a very average squad and saved us from certain relegation had we stayed with FdV and all this with little or no support in terms of squad strengthening. It would not be sensible to replace Roy now with the new season just around the corner and in anyway he has a contract to the end of next season. What good proven Manager out there would want to come to us with the club directors keen to sell and with minimum investment available to strengthen the current squad.

 

Jacey Flag 13 Jul 20 4.28pm

Originally posted by Willo

Kane was the player with the best delivery.
Hodgson tried other players but they just didn't have the quality of delivery which Kane possessed so it was thought that this gave England a better chance of scoring.

Poor tactics though Willo,never did work.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards grumpymort Flag US/Thailand/UK 13 Jul 20 4.31pm

Originally posted by Willo

Kane was the player with the best delivery.
Hodgson tried other players but they just didn't have the quality of delivery which Kane possessed so it was thought that this gave England a better chance of scoring.


Is that you Roy?

Originally posted by Den1923

I disagree, he has kept us in the PL with a very average squad and saved us from certain relegation had we stayed with FdV and all this with little or no support in terms of squad strengthening. It would not be sensible to replace Roy now with the new season just around the corner and in anyway he has a contract to the end of next season. What good proven Manager out there would want to come to us with the club directors keen to sell and with minimum investment available to strengthen the current squad.


How have we got an average squad we are around mid table squad and plenty of international players.

Squad is the magic word that Roy doesn't understand 25 men he appears to only know 13 max.

Correct he does have another year contract.

I agree who would want to come to us maybe if they knew Wilf was going and they had the money more interest but this club doesn't have good record of that does it we sell Wilf and SP does a bunch of super cheap or free players only.

The whole club needs full new owner ship not just Americans maybe when this takes place a manager of their choice will come in until then SP loves Roy so he wont get rid of him unless we was relegated.

Edited by grumpymort (13 Jul 2020 4.39pm)

 


(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 13 Jul 20 4.31pm

Originally posted by Willo

Kane was the player with the best delivery.
Hodgson tried other players but they just didn't have the quality of delivery which Kane possessed so it was thought that this gave England a better chance of scoring.

Tells you all you need to know about the quality of the England players selected by the manager if the centre forward had to take corners. It was one of the most bizarre decisions ever made at that level.

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 13 Jul 20 4.31pm

Originally posted by Jacey

Poor tactics though Willo,never did work.

The record books will show that under Hodgson, England only lost 8 out of 56 games.

 

Den1923 Flag 13 Jul 20 4.58pm

Originally posted by Willo

The record books will show that under Hodgson, England only lost 8 out of 56 games.

Yes that is a win rate of +58% and currently at palace its nearly 43%, which is not bad given the squad he has!

 

Page 27 of 34 < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Is It Time For Roy To Go, Yes or NO