This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Sargon interviews Lauren Southern (one of the three journalists banned, for those who don't know) This is what the left and the 'woke' Tory party have given us.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
'Radical Christian' Lauren Southern was detained under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The BBC explains more about this and how it's being misused [Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (14 Mar 2018 4.13am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
did the BBC employ jimmy savile ? and what is their role in the most recent cover up in Telford ? The BBC have barely covered Telford, Saville was a monster who clearly had protection from the media & members of various governments. What were talking about here is the industrialised rape/abuse of thousands of girls, they were chosen because they're not Muslim.
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
What were talking about here is the industrialised rape/abuse of thousands of girls, they were chosen because they're not Muslim. Edited by Ouzo Dan (14 Mar 2018 8.07am) Were they? I thought they were targeted because they were vulnerable and available. That and their low opinion of women in general.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by topcat
Were they? I thought they were targeted because they were vulnerable and available. That and their low opinion of women in general. Individuals within gangs have even said they were yet you make dim statements like that! There are no Islamic girls amongst these victims yet these criminals were living in areas with high Islamic populations. It takes quite something to ignore the bleeding obvious. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Mar 2018 11.19am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by topcat
Were they? I thought they were targeted because they were vulnerable and available. That and their low opinion of women in general. The trouble with that is that no one actually knows except the rapists. We do know that Muslim men from pakistan and Bangladesh are responsible for a hugely disproportionate amount of abuse and that most of the victims were not Muslim.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by topcat
Were they? I thought they were targeted because they were vulnerable and available. That and their low opinion of women in general. Plenty of these gang members in previous cases have in court admitted to targeting non Muslim's. Head meet sand.
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
Plenty of these gang members in previous cases have in court admitted to targeting non Muslim's. Head meet sand. Not at all, at least not intentionally. I suspect that if these men lived in pakistan and Bangladesh they would be targeting vulnerable women there irrespective of their religion or colour. Certain religions, or certain interpretations of religion, seem to have have very little respect for women. Or law.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Individuals within gangs have even said they were yet you make dim statements like that! There are no Islamic girls amongst these victims yet these criminals were living in areas with high Islamic populations. It takes quite something to ignore the bleeding obvious. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Mar 2018 11.19am) It was an intentionally dim statement but I bow to your superiority. I have no idea if there are no Islamic girls and if there are none, why that is. I suspect that a rapist is more concerned with availability and not getting caught than anything else but again I shall bow to your knowledge on the subject.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The trouble with that is that no one actually knows except the rapists. We do know that Muslim men from pakistan and Bangladesh are responsible for a hugely disproportionate amount of abuse and that most of the victims were not Muslim. I'd agree with your first paragraph. I suspect it is down to religion and upbringing but could be wrong.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
In terms of the scumbags, I suspect its more to do with their f***ed up culture rather than Islam in particular given that a majority of them seem to come from a specific region of pakistan. Along with the reality that many are probably feeble minded given the high proportion of Cousin marriage that has gone on for generations in this specific region. But it is too easy to focus solely on them. My ire is aimed at the people who knowingly either ignored what was going on or actively colluded to ensure that they escaped justice for as long as they did. These people were meant to be amongst our best and brightest, enjoying the most privileged positions in our public services and they sacrificed these girls for the sake of their own careers. I loathe them with a genuine passion.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by topcat
It was an intentionally dim statement but I bow to your superiority. I have no idea if there are no Islamic girls and if there are none, why that is. I suspect that a rapist is more concerned with availability and not getting caught than anything else but again I shall bow to your knowledge on the subject. I have knowledge of these cases yes, but I make no claim of superiority over you. I would only ask that you look into these troublesome instances of state feebleness, the fault of which has been 'policies of sensitivities'. I've always argued that the Police should be colour and race blind. These cases are entirety the fault of political and ideological interference into the Police and the work of councils. We now have a whole management structure that fears 'perception' instead of the application of the law or safe guarding. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Mar 2018 12.16pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.