This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Has Hol become an old haunt for tax and finance savvy analysts or what? I'm going to have to seriously consider jotting some of this down! Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Jul 2019 5.53pm) Simply send me your account numbers, bank card numbers, credit card and pin numbers along with your online banking login details and I guarantee I can save you money.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Simply send me your account numbers, bank card numbers, credit card and pin numbers along with your online banking login details and I guarantee I can save you money. Na....come on, we all know that you need to be a Nigerian Prince in exile for that.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Na....come on, we all know that you need to be a Nigerian Prince in exile for that. Who says I'm not? It would be racist to think I couldn't be a Nigerian just because I is white.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Who says I'm not? It would be racist to think I couldn't be a Nigerian just because I is white. But are you identifying as a Prince or a Princess - I think we need to be told in the absence of photos
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
|
Originally posted by becky
But are you identifying as a Prince or a Princess - I think we need to be told in the absence of photos Don't want to forced to comply with outdated gender labels.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Don't want to forced to comply with outdated gender labels.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
'US politician insists on chaperone for interview with female reporter' [Link] Not sure why this is of interest to a UK audience? But if there's a chance for the BBC to mock Christians in the US, then it's fair game.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
'US politician insists on chaperone for interview with female reporter' [Link] Not sure why this is of interest to a UK audience? But if there's a chance for the BBC to mock Christians in the US, then it's fair game. So if you are a prominent male women can make all sorts of unsubstantiated allegations against you. However if you try to protect yourself from this by ensuring you are not alone with women you are then called sexist, discrimination etc. I believe the words eat, cake and want spring to mind.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
So if you are a prominent male women can make all sorts of unsubstantiated allegations against you. However if you try to protect yourself from this by ensuring you are not alone with women you are then called sexist, discrimination etc. I believe the words eat, cake and want spring to mind. I would have thought the woman should be happy he showed her respect.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
'US politician insists on chaperone for interview with female reporter' [Link] Not sure why this is of interest to a UK audience? But if there's a chance for the BBC to mock Christians in the US, then it's fair game. The logical conclusion of the 'me too' generation and a tsunami of sexual abuse allegations.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I understand that as it's what I do but any dividends over the limit is taxed at the usual rates anyway. There are tax savings but not on a massive scale and it still doesn't answer my point that if the BBC pay their tax for them it's a benefit in kind and therefore taxable. It's also not exactly good PR for the BBC to pay the tax on behalf of it's millionaire presenters at the same time as making the skint over 75s effectively pay this tax for them I haven't read the whole thread so may be jumping in at the wrong point. However IR35 changed recently so that it is down to the 'employer' to determine whether someone is to be taxed as self employed or is in effect an employee. The change was brought in first in the public sector. As a result most public sector organisations are treating all people as employees even when they clearly are self employed contractors for fear they will end up lumbered with paying the PAYE anyway upon investigation by the Revenue. Therefore those that work through limited companies are being subjected to PAYE now. So effectively the tax is being paid by the employer on behalf of the contractor. But it's a sloppy shorthand for a complex situation.
|
|
|
Typical BBC. The BBC make the heading line "leave the us"
|
|
|
'BBC rewrites it's own rules to let Lineker rant on Twitter'
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Of course he can. When it suits their agenda it's fine. If it doesn't you get the sack or a month of diversity workshops. At least, no one gives a f*** what Lineker says: just an irrelevant, overpaid tit with expensive clothes and accessories. He only did tap ins for ten years of his career too. Frankly, Sorloth could have scored most of them. I was agreeing with you up to your final sentence, where you seem to have suddenly lost the plot.
|
|
|
Originally posted by palace_in_frogland
I was agreeing with you up to your final sentence, where you seem to have suddenly lost the plot.
It was a bit of an exaggeration.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Yes, you are not wrong! The No Deal story is the lead on the home page (and placed further down the pecking order in other media outlets). And they've buried the 'Donald Trump impeachment bid fails in the House' story down the home page. It was a prominent BBC story when the Democrats were going for it though. Meanwhile, 'BBC's 'deeply upsetting' plan to send TV licence fee 'police' to OAPs' homes to demand they pay annual £154.40 fee' [Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (18 Jul 2019 11.12am)
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.