This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
US politics
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  berlinpalace  berlin 28 Nov 22 6.37am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
I think it’s called stereotyping not racism although meanings change for the receiver nowadays. Always good for a handkerchief and a cuddle.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Stirlingsays  28 Nov 22 7.22am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
Making cultural references aligned to popular German names isn't 'casual racism' you berk. You are on here complaining about groomers being exposed and using any means you can to b1tch and moan about those who point it out. Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2022 7.34am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Nov 22 7.25am |
|
|---|---|
|
Noticing a pattern? Normalising, discussing the issues within the public sphere as a topic of understanding. That's always the first phrase and it happened for decades before all their other sexual breakthroughs to attack the traditional family. They are against anything that's strong and successful, that's obvious from their veneration of victim status. Their focus is especially within the western sphere as that's where most of the ideology is taught. Why do the vulnerable believe it? Well, that's a spiralling den of despair, sometimes self-hatred, father issues and other mental problems and sometimes idealogy born from selective and amplified indoctrinated versions of history. [Tweet Link]
Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2022 7.36am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 28 Nov 22 8.10am |
|
|---|---|
|
Less than 50% of students at Cambridge are straight. This is our next generation. Why do I think this is just a fad as straight is boring and most young people are desperate to be interesting. Still it plays into the left alphabet soup playbook because these people will be the movers and shakers in twenty years.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Nov 22 10.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Just how annoyingly asinine that commentary is. No one is saying that grooming is exclusive, hell I've spent considerable time posting about grooming gangs who are heterosexuals. The point is the expansion and enabling of grooming from this area. This wasn't mainstreamed before and now progressives practically encourage this behaviour. What is truly asinine is regarding my comment as asinine! There is a very important distinction to be made, which the position you consistently take, whether on the UK grooming gang problems, or on this targeting of the LGBT community in the USA, fails to understand, let alone acknowledge. Which is that it's the crime, and the criminal, which needs to be addressed and not the community they come from nor their religious beliefs or any other attributes they might innocently share with others. You seem to think that suggesting that a disproportionate number coming from any particular background, whether or not through an accurate, or imagined, perception, is a reasonable and acceptable basis for discussion. I do not. I think it distorts the issue, taints communities, builds barriers and creates divisions. I think it's counter productive in trying to deal with serious matters and that this approach makes things worse, not better. The targeting of the LGBT communities in the USA is grossly unreasonable. That the behaviour of some people is unacceptable is not the same as suggesting all those who share some aspects with them is. After all we all share some aspects with everyone else. Why pick on those you just don't like? Those who take this approach need to blow away the fog of their own prejudices and see the crimes and the criminals for what they are. They are crimes and criminals. Nothing else. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (28 Nov 2022 11.03am)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Nov 22 11.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Ok, so you are a naturist who likes to be nude in the allotted areas and can see no harm and nor can; whatever floats your boat and you sing it’s praises and feel more should try it, again fair enough. Now if a local school asked you to read to the kids and explain about naturism and it’s rights and wrongs would you wear clothes. I bet you would. Why should a drag Queen not read to kids dressed in their civvies. I know the two ronnies and other shows etc before that but this is done solely for a reaction to try to normalise how they dress and parade. It’s wrong even just for the fact that the kids don’t understand it. Why arnt they doing it in front of 300 odd 15 year olds. Because they would get absolutely nailed and they know it. Cowardice comes in many forms ! I am sorry but I see no connection to the point I made. I don't think a drag Queen should talking about their lifestyle to young children, however dressed. I do think, at an appropriate age, children should be better educated than my generation was, about what relationships in the modern world look like today and the way that some folk identify and behave. Children are going to become aware so it's better the subject is treated properly, and not hidden away in a closet.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| berlinpalace berlin 28 Nov 22 12.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Less than 50% of students at Cambridge are straight. This is our next generation. Why do I think this is just a fad as straight is boring and most young people are desperate to be interesting. Still it plays into the left alphabet soup playbook because these people will be the movers and shakers in twenty years.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 28 Nov 22 12.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
LOL
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Nov 22 1.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What is truly asinine is regarding my comment as asinine! There is a very important distinction to be made, which the position you consistently take, whether on the UK grooming gang problems, or on this targeting of the LGBT community in the USA, fails to understand, let alone acknowledge. Which is that it's the crime, and the criminal, which needs to be addressed and not the community they come from nor their religious beliefs or any other attributes they might innocently share with others. You seem to think that suggesting that a disproportionate number coming from any particular background, whether or not through an accurate, or imagined, perception, is a reasonable and acceptable basis for discussion. I do not. I think it distorts the issue, taints communities, builds barriers and creates divisions. I think it's counter productive in trying to deal with serious matters and that this approach makes things worse, not better. The targeting of the LGBT communities in the USA is grossly unreasonable. That the behaviour of some people is unacceptable is not the same as suggesting all those who share some aspects with them is. After all we all share some aspects with everyone else. Why pick on those you just don't like? Those who take this approach need to blow away the fog of their own prejudices and see the crimes and the criminals for what they are. They are crimes and criminals. Nothing else. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (28 Nov 2022 11.03am) There are statistical facts regarding child abuse that I haven't gone into here. Those who wish to find them are free to, I know them....you as usual couldn't give a damn. You are far more interested in your narcissist virtue signal over points that haven't been made. Well regardless very old bean, facts don't care about your feelings or anybody else's. That said, these were not my point. Another fact, that we constantly see here, is your continual attempt to manipulate the discussion around to attacks on the alphabet mob. I'll state this again, because you ignored it the first time. Being a homosexual does not mean you are a kiddie fiddler, there will be many within that community just as p1ssed off by degeneracy around children as I am....In fact I know of several who are. Still, this will no doubt make no difference to your continual word salad of victimhood defence. People who want to talk about sex to very young children should be told to feck off. Previous generations had the commonsense to know this. You however don't agree.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 28 Nov 22 8.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am sorry but I see no connection to the point I made. I don't think a drag Queen should talking about their lifestyle to young children, however dressed. I do think, at an appropriate age, children should be better educated than my generation was, about what relationships in the modern world look like today and the way that some folk identify and behave. Children are going to become aware so it's better the subject is treated properly, and not hidden away in a closet. Agreed. How old ?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 28 Nov 22 8.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
That’s a necrapiggiac Edited by cryrst (28 Nov 2022 8.10pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Nov 22 10.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There are statistical facts regarding child abuse that I haven't gone into here. Those who wish to find them are free to, I know them....you as usual couldn't give a damn. You are far more interested in your narcissist virtue signal over points that haven't been made. Well regardless very old bean, facts don't care about your feelings or anybody else's. That said, these were not my point. Another fact, that we constantly see here, is your continual attempt to manipulate the discussion around to attacks on the alphabet mob. I'll state this again, because you ignored it the first time. Being a homosexual does not mean you are a kiddie fiddler, there will be many within that community just as p1ssed off by degeneracy around children as I am....In fact I know of several who are. Still, this will no doubt make no difference to your continual word salad of victimhood defence. People who want to talk about sex to very young children should be told to feck off. Previous generations had the commonsense to know this. You however don't agree.
That's quite an interesting reply! Interesting in that not one word of it actually has anything at all to do with the points I was making. Almost everything you write above would not be disputed by me, excepting, of course, your silly misrepresentation of my own approach. For the record, of course I don't think anyone should talk about sex to very young children. What a disgusting misrepresentation of what I actually wrote! What this tends to prove is that either you genuinely don't understand the issues or, more likely in my opinion, don't want to acknowledge and address them because to do so would pull the rug from under your whole hypothesis. I am not in any way defending anyone. A defence is not needed. I am criticising the way the right wrongly describe criminals and now, in the USA, are attacking a whole section of society based solely on their prejudices. So rather than deflect again perhaps you would try to actually face the issue. Why do the right do this? What are they hoping to achieve by it? I can see no benefit politically. Is it just to keep the base energised and to give them some red meat to chew and their eyes away from troubling internal strife?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.