This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Brendan Rodgers just been sacked by Leicester. I know he's had a tough season but would not be turned off at all if he came to Palace
|
|
|
Potter will be sacked soon and would be a far better choice.
Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978 |
|
|
Originally posted by YoDougie
Brendan Rodgers just been sacked by Leicester. I know he's had a tough season but would not be turned off at all if he came to Palace I'd definitely have him at palace, Leicester have been overly reliant on vardys goals for years and always said they would struggle when It came to replacing him. Plus the owner doesn't seem as interested as the father was. They've gone stale and probably need new ideas but I still rate Rodgers as a coach.
|
|
|
Originally posted by kevlee
Potter will be sacked soon and would be a far better choice. Agreed
|
|
|
Originally posted by kevlee
Potter will be sacked soon and would be a far better choice. Serves Chelsea right. It cost them £15m to get Potter from Brighton and they'll have to pay him around £50m if they sack him. On top of the £7m Tuchel got to leave.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
Would be very happy with either Potter or Rodgers. Great win for Roy yesterday but I still don't want him in charge next season. I'm guessing I'm the dissenting voice. I just don't think either of them is a good fit for here. Rodgers seems good with good players but also seems unable to keep things going. Potter doesn't seem to have the clarity our current team needs. If we had a much better squad then I'd agree that these are good managers. For our limited squad, and likely low budget, I feel that we need a motivator with a clear message. The more Cooper or Dyche figures - just my feelings. Another thing about Rodgers is he's rumoured to be a club yes man, as long as he gets his rewards. In our case, I want a manager to say when players are obviously required - our board seems to need a kick up the Arthur.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Agreed I can see and would be very happy with this scenario..!! Got to take care of business first though..!!!! Assuming Roy keeps us up, which I’m becoming increasingly confident he will - don’t you think it would be the perfect signing off - as in saving his “own team” as his parting shot on a long and the whole successful career..!! Maybe sometimes the stars are just aligned.!! COYP
|
|
|
Originally posted by Plaistow Eagle
I can see and would be very happy with this scenario..!! Got to take care of business first though..!!!! Assuming Roy keeps us up, which I’m becoming increasingly confident he will - don’t you think it would be the perfect signing off - as in saving his “own team” as his parting shot on a long and the whole successful career..!! Maybe sometimes the stars are just aligned.!! COYP Indeed. I was, of course, thinking in terms of next season
|
|
|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
Would be very happy with either Potter or Rodgers. Great win for Roy yesterday but I still don't want him in charge next season. I agree about Roy with one proviso: I think we need to get the next hire right. With PV, as we all know, he was our third or fourth choice and I think in retrospect, going that far down the line was an error. I'd like to think we have one or two prime candidates for the job and good reasons for hiring them. If those managers - the ones we do want - turn us down, then I would take Roy for another year rather than compromise again, and end up with someone less than ideal. Roy, at least, would give us competence and stability for twelve months; not the perfect solution but better than being rushed. I've never liked Rodgers' personality but I can't help thinking he might be quite a good hire for us.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
|
No to Rodger’s and no again. Offers nothing to a club like Palace.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Another thing about Rodgers is he's rumoured to be a club yes man, as long as he gets his rewards. In our case, I want a manager to say when players are obviously required - our board seems to need a kick up the Arthur. Vieira did but the board didn't take any notice
|
|
|
I wouldn't go with Paddy at this stage. It's by no means a straightforward decision. I do think we avoid vanity projects where a big name manager think they are doing us a favour (Gerrard, Lampard). Ultimately though I suppose all managers end up failing with ever shortening tenures at clubs. Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
I'm not too sure about suggestions that either Potter or Rodgers would be suitable managers for us. True, Rodgers is available now, but he never seems to demonstrate much passion and that's what we need after Patrick's lethargic performances. As for Potter, call it infantile, but for me he still has a flavour of Brighton about him and he hasn't been at all convincing at Chelsea. I would like to see Paddy make a huge impact during the remaining games to the extent that Roy influences Mr P and the Board and recommends him for the permanent role. He has shown considerable ability with the U21s and is a loyal Palace man. I vote for Paddy.
|
|
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I wouldn't go with Paddy at this stage. It's by no means a straightforward decision. I do think we avoid vanity projects where a big name manager think they are doing us a favour (Gerrard, Lampard). Ultimately though I suppose all managers end up failing with ever shortening tenures at clubs. I wholly concur with these comments.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
I would like to see Paddy make a huge impact during the remaining games to the extent that Roy influences Mr P and the Board and recommends him for the permanent role. He has shown considerable ability with the U21s and is a loyal Palace man. I vote for Paddy. It was noticeable yesterday that Roy was chatting quite a lot with Ray just like in the old days yet this time round Paddy is supposedly the Assistant Manager but it seems that although he has the job title he may not actually have the job
|
|
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
I do think we avoid vanity projects where a big name manager think they are doing us a favour (Gerrard, Lampard). Was that the case or was it just the spin put on it by people who turned us down for other reasons
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Serves Chelsea right. It cost them £15m to get Potter from Brighton and they'll have to pay him around £50m if they sack him. On top of the £7m Tuchel got to leave. Potter will not be a Palace manager, he doesnt need to manage us. Money, he doesnt need, potential to get into Europe limited, why would he come here?
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.