You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 2 2026 7.49am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 376 of 1552 < 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 >
davenotamonkey Flag 03 May 17 1.00am

Originally posted by Kermit8

How could it get to that and how could the Leave nor Remain campaign keep us in the dark if that is true and our obliged financial commitments are 100bn euros?

We can't walk. We owe what we owe. It will make us a bad credit risk going out into the big world.

This stinks.

Because they are plucking figures out of their arses.

"Has anyone asked them to?" (account for how they arrived at that figure)

Are you saying, when presented with a huge invoice grossly at odds with your expectations, rather than requesting the full breakdown, you meekly lube up and pay it? Actually, I can believe you do.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 May 17 6.09am

Originally posted by davenotamonkey

Because they are plucking figures out of their arses.

"Has anyone asked them to?" (account for how they arrived at that figure)

Are you saying, when presented with a huge invoice grossly at odds with your expectations, rather than requesting the full breakdown, you meekly lube up and pay it? Actually, I can believe you do.

Completely agree. The EU are pulling figures from their arse for their own purposes, which at the moment are interfering with the UK General Election.

The Insitute for Government covers the matter in the most impartial manner I have found:

[Link]

Including the interesting line that the UK government appears to have a strong legal case for not paying any settlement and that the final amount will come down to politics.

The EU will have a serious budget shortfall when the UK leaves. Of course they are going to try and squeeze as much out of us as they can and use this matter, on which they appear to have little legal foundation, to disrupt negotiations.

Good old EU. Such a decent, honest and not devious organisation. Why did we ever vote to leave?

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 03 May 17 6.49am

Originally posted by davenotamonkey

Because they are plucking figures out of their arses.

"Has anyone asked them to?" (account for how they arrived at that figure)

Are you saying, when presented with a huge invoice grossly at odds with your expectations, rather than requesting the full breakdown, you meekly lube up and pay it? Actually, I can believe you do.

So, basically, you have no idea, not a clue, about the legitimacy of the 'damage' and whether the figures are correct. Sounds about right.

Oh, and we haven't been 'invoiced' yet so requests at how they arrived at unverified, unofficial figures would be jumping the gun and make us look stupid. Still, I wouldn't put it past Brexiteers to demand right now something they haven't got.

Edited by Kermit8 (03 May 2017 6.53am)

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 May 17 6.53am

Originally posted by Kermit8

So, basically, you have no idea, not a clue, about the legitimacy of the 'damage' and whether the figures are correct. Sounds about right.

Oh, and we haven't been 'invoiced' yet so requests at how they arrived at the unverified figures would be jumping the gun and make us seem even more stupid. Still, I wouldn't put it past Brexiteers to demand right now something they haven't got.

Edited by Kermit8 (03 May 2017 6.51am)

But neither do you Michael, nott anyone else for that matter.

Again, read this:

[Link]

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 03 May 17 7.11am

Originally posted by matt_himself

But neither do you Michael, nott anyone else for that matter.

Again, read this:

[Link]

An excellent read indeed and although it broadens the picture it still doesn't, and it is being honest, make for 'good news'. We can't not pay what we rightfully owe even if we can squirm out legally. The fallout would be more destructive than the alternative. Credit rating and trustworthiness would take a hit.

The Government should refuse all-out to the demand of a one-off payment though and insist the various financial commitments are spread out.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


davenotamonkey Flag 03 May 17 7.39am

Originally posted by Kermit8

So, basically, you have no idea, not a clue, about the legitimacy of the 'damage' and whether the figures are correct. Sounds about right.

Oh, and we haven't been 'invoiced' yet so requests at how they arrived at unverified, unofficial figures would be jumping the gun and make us look stupid. Still, I wouldn't put it past Brexiteers to demand right now something they haven't got.

Edited by Kermit8 (03 May 2017 6.53am)

Unverified, unofficial figures quoted by (among many others), and derived from the EU Commission? Figures that can vary by as much as a factor of 2? When I was a kid, I had to show my working. Then again, the EU does have problems "showing it's working", as auditors will attest to since 1995.

The reason why we've not been "invoiced" yet, that reason why negotiations haven't started yet, is because we all need to wait for Queen Merkel of Europe's next coronation. Because the EU is basically Germany. Until then, they'll do their best to undermine our election, show the world their petty, vindictive, fiscally irresponsible side, and break the very treaties they hold so very dear.

Given that Juncker states the negotiation positions will necessarily have to be clear and transparent, I wonder why it's "so stupid" that they publish how they arrived at this fantasy-land figure? Oh, yes. Brexiteers are completely unhinged from reality to "demand" from the claimants the basis of the claim. "They haven't got" that yet? So presumably the figures are just plucked out of Juncker's arse then.

You will be finding yourself in an ever-vanishing minority venerating a hostile, petulant and unreasonable side that seeks out "punishment beatings" as a means to exercise unaccountable power over supposedly sovereign countries, and those that seek to escape an abusive relationship. Enjoy it. I'll be over here, on the right side of history.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 May 17 7.40am

Originally posted by Kermit8

An excellent read indeed and although it broadens the picture it still doesn't, and it is being honest, make for 'good news'. We can't not pay what we rightfully owe even if we can squirm out legally. The fallout would be more destructive than the alternative. Credit rating and trustworthiness would take a hit.

The Government should refuse all-out to the demand of a one-off payment though and insist the various financial commitments are spread out.

You did read the part about how the government have legal advice that any 'divorce bill' is not legally binding and that it will all come down to politics?

It won't affect credit ratings if it is not legally enforceable.

Both the PM and the Chancellor have said we will apart what is rightfully owed. I don't know where you are getting this notion that the government will 'squirm' from debt.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 03 May 17 8.20am

Originally posted by matt_himself

You did read the part about how the government have legal advice that any 'divorce bill' is not legally binding and that it will all come down to politics?

It won't affect credit ratings if it is not legally enforceable.

Both the PM and the Chancellor have said we will apart what is rightfully owed. I don't know where you are getting this notion that the government will 'squirm' from debt.

I did. And you don't strike me as the kind of guy who would get out of paying signed-up to bills through legal loopholes. I don't believe for the good of the country going into the future we should not fulfil our obligations because we can get out of it.

I sincerely believe it will affect our standing should we 'welch' - "you can't trust the British" etc - and help drag ourselves backwards.

As it stands if we can get out with a £40bill or so hit that would be preferable to the what would be imo worse alternatives

Edited by Kermit8 (03 May 2017 8.22am)

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


legaleagle Flag 03 May 17 8.55am

Originally posted by matt_himself

You did read the part about how the government have legal advice that any 'divorce bill' is not legally binding and that it will all come down to politics?

It won't affect credit ratings if it is not legally enforceable.

Both the PM and the Chancellor have said we will apart what is rightfully owed. I don't know where you are getting this notion that the government will 'squirm' from debt.

Was that the same Government legal advice that said the Supreme Court would rule in favour of the Government rather than Fiona Miller?

 

europalace Flag Europe 03 May 17 9.50am

€100bn? Wow, the UK should pay up and of course it will pay up but not admit to paying up, same old, same old, never ever admitting it makes a mistake. Even if the economy goes into more of a tail spin, the UK will never admit it and paint a 'rosy' picture on anything. A country can never move on until it admits its mistakes.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 May 17 9.59am

Originally posted by legaleagle

Was that the same Government legal advice that said the Supreme Court would rule in favour of the Government rather than Fiona Miller?

Who is Fiona Miller?

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 May 17 10.05am

Originally posted by europalace

€100bn? Wow, the UK should pay up and of course it will pay up but not admit to paying up, same old, same old, never ever admitting it makes a mistake. Even if the economy goes into more of a tail spin, the UK will never admit it and paint a 'rosy' picture on anything. A country can never move on until it admits its mistakes.

As a resident, and presumably taxpayer, in a Euro denominated country, you must be delighted with the effective leadership the EU has shown in resolving the Greek economic decisively and effectively. Why have one bailout when you can have many? Why also not cut off an economy for the drip feeding of taxpayers because it is a complete waste of money continue doing so? Could it be because of a perceive overriding necessity to continue the social and economic engineering job that is the Euro?

How are you enjoying this 'rosy' scenario and seeing your tax Euros end up in the pockets of Greeks, whom have retired at 55?

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

npn Flag Crowborough 03 May 17 11.10am

Originally posted by europalace

€100bn? Wow, the UK should pay up and of course it will pay up but not admit to paying up, same old, same old, never ever admitting it makes a mistake. Even if the economy goes into more of a tail spin, the UK will never admit it and paint a 'rosy' picture on anything. A country can never move on until it admits its mistakes.

Genuine question: why do you think the UK SHOULD pay up? That figure seems to have just been plucked out of the air (a la Diane Abbott). I certainly wouldn't pay a bill just because someone said "err, how about 100bn?". I'd want to see it fully broken down, and legal, not just "we are charging you as much as we can to put other countries off of doing the same"

Of course we should pay what (if anything) we owe, but I have yet to see on what basis we owe anything (obviously I haven't read all the documentation, so I would imagine there are certain outstanding liabilities)

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 May 17 11.19am

Originally posted by matt_himself

As a resident, and presumably taxpayer, in a Euro denominated country, you must be delighted with the effective leadership the EU has shown in resolving the Greek economic decisively and effectively. Why have one bailout when you can have many? Why also not cut off an economy for the drip feeding of taxpayers because it is a complete waste of money continue doing so? Could it be because of a perceive overriding necessity to continue the social and economic engineering job that is the Euro?

How are you enjoying this 'rosy' scenario and seeing your tax Euros end up in the pockets of Greeks, whom have retired at 55?

I don't think money is going into the pockets of ordinary Greek people.

 

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 03 May 17 11.19am

Originally posted by npn

Genuine question: why do you think the UK SHOULD pay up? That figure seems to have just been plucked out of the air (a la Diane Abbott). I certainly wouldn't pay a bill just because someone said "err, how about 100bn?". I'd want to see it fully broken down, and legal, not just "we are charging you as much as we can to put other countries off of doing the same"

Of course we should pay what (if anything) we owe, but I have yet to see on what basis we owe anything (obviously I haven't read all the documentation, so I would imagine there are certain outstanding liabilities)

I believe we have signed up to projects and financial commitments that go way beyond our Brexit date so we will owe what is coming there and, i'd imagine, that would be reciprocal if some of that money has been marked for UK-based recipients such as Cornwall.

for the sake of goodwill and our image to the rest of the world i hope we don't try and welch on htose outgoings. There is Hard Brexit and then there is sheer hubris and stupidity. Wouldn't put it past them though.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 May 17 2.03pm

Nigel Lawson has wisely pointed out that the only significant contributors to the EU budget are Germany and the UK, and when the latter leaves, there will be "a huge improvement in the UK budget and a hole in the EU budget".
Lawson agrees with Theresa May that no deal is better than a bad deal, adding: "I regret it looks as though we will have to settle for no deal."
He believes the UK should offer the EU a "very good deal - a free trade deal with no strings attached in both our interests".
"For political reasons, they may refuse it, in which case we wait patiently and we are out," he says.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

davenotamonkey Flag 03 May 17 5.53pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I don't think money is going into the pockets of ordinary Greek people.

Certainly not from Malta. Perpetual net recipients of UK taxpayer money, 5th largest net per-capita recipients of UK taxpayer money (the Greeks beat them to 4th), 10x the representative power of the UK taxpayer. No wonder EUcucks like "EUropalace" loved handing over their short-lived sovereignty to the EU. They probably saw (someone else's) dollar signs. Will they finally start having to pay in, once we stop the gravy train?

Edited by davenotamonkey (03 May 2017 6.43pm)

malta.png Attachment: malta.png (21.38Kb)

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 May 17 9.37pm

Jean Claude Juncker is an interesting chap.

See him here:

[Link]

Read this - fascinating (from an 'alt right' source):

[Link]

I cannot wait to see what I find next. Have no fear, I will post it here!

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Stirlingsays Flag 03 May 17 9.45pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

Jean Claude Juncker is an interesting chap.

See him here:

[Link]

Read this - fascinating (from an 'alt right' source):

[Link]

I cannot wait to see what I find next. Have no fear, I will post it here!

He pretty much represents the worse of the EU for me. Jean Claude Juncker is a complete arse.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 May 17 10.22pm

character not policy assassination is still de riguer I see.

 

Page 376 of 1552 < 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic