This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Painter
If Howe has the job, why are we showing Lampard around the training ground? Not according to Davey Provan . . . Done deal apparently, kind of, ish, maybe, deffo, sort of . . .
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by Melbourne Eagle
Could the delay in an announcement being made - whether Roy is staying or not - be dependent on us being mathematically safe in the PL? Yes, I know we are almost certainly safe but maybe a new appointment is being delayed for this very reason? FWIW I think we need a change, although a risk. Edited by Melbourne Eagle (07 May 2021 1.52pm) So basically we need to take a risk. Why? And to achieve what? We’re comfortably mid table, nowhere near relegation at any point this season or the couple prior. If we take a "risk", fail to invest and start trying to play like City, we will either go down or be in deep trouble and have to bring in a firefighter manager (who’ll probably spend the next 5 years of our transfer budget on firefighter players). And for what? Even if we do spend this summer - why doesn’t Roy get to work with the investment. After what he’s achieved at the club, doesn’t he deserve that?
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
So basically we need to take a risk. Why? And to achieve what? We’re comfortably mid table, nowhere near relegation at any point this season or the couple prior. If we take a "risk", fail to invest and start trying to play like City, we will either go down or be in deep trouble and have to bring in a firefighter manager (who’ll probably spend the next 5 years of our transfer budget on firefighter players). And for what? Even if we do spend this summer - why doesn’t Roy get to work with the investment. After what he’s achieved at the club, doesn’t he deserve that? Very good post. To continue your line of argument, either we have money to buy a few new, better, quicker, probably younger players who will improve the team, or we don't. If we do then why shouldn't Hodgson have the benefit of the investment? He is being judged for the awful football we play but has had next to no money spent on the team. Most posters who are 'Roy out' stress that they have no unreasonable expectations regarding sexy football at Palace, and just want a bit more entertainment and endeavour. Why wouldn't a reinforced team under Hodgson provide that? If we don't have the money for any new players then all the more reason to keep Roy.
|
|
|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
Very good post. To continue your line of argument, either we have money to buy a few new, better, quicker, probably younger players who will improve the team, or we don't. If we do then why shouldn't Hodgson have the benefit of the investment? He is being judged for the awful football we play but has had next to no money spent on the team. Most posters who are 'Roy out' stress that they have no unreasonable expectations regarding sexy football at Palace, and just want a bit more entertainment and endeavour. Why wouldn't a reinforced team under Hodgson provide that? If we don't have the money for any new players then all the more reason to keep Roy. No reason at all. For me, the real reason Roy's position is in doubt leading into next season (if it is) is a result of either one of two things: 1) he is genuinely retiring I don't mean this in an insulting way but I've genuinely never been so disappointed at the conduct of our fans. Roy has conducted himself honourably throughout and has done an excellent job - he should really go down in the clubs history for it. Instead, he's being hounded out. And for what? As you said, he's earned the investment, and if we're not investing then Roy is absolutely the man for the job.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
No reason at all. For me, the real reason Roy's position is in doubt leading into next season (if it is) is a result of either one of two things: 1) he is genuinely retiring I don't mean this in an insulting way but I've genuinely never been so disappointed at the conduct of our fans. Roy has conducted himself honourably throughout and has done an excellent job - he should really go down in the clubs history for it. Instead, he's being hounded out. And for what? As you said, he's earned the investment, and if we're not investing then Roy is absolutely the man for the job.
I'm in agreement with your last 2 posts, which by the way would be perfectly at home in the ' Roy Out ' thread ! At some point we will need to continue without the safe pair of hands that Roy undoubtably is. From my perspective, now feels the right time. Roy can walk away with his dignity intact and that's the least he deserves. A new man ( or woman, this is 2021 ! ) can come in on a longer contact than the rolling 12 month deal that Hodgson has been on, and the club can re-set itself to start thinking longer term as opposed to the season by season approach currently employed. I suspect that Palace will attempt to do that
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
|
We’re in a race to 17th place .. terrible game 1-0 loss.
|
|
|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
I don't think there's much argument that another manager would have gotten more points than Roy with the current squad, but is there anyone arguing that we've seen anything resembling entertainment for most of this season? We've also had Lady Luck very much on our side, sometimes to hilarious levels like the Brighton game 100% on the money.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
No but I wasn't comparing the two but merely addressing one single point that you made (many weeks ago) don't care if it was today or last year... was a poor comparison.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
|
Originally posted by Vaibow
You argue just like my wife and she's never wrong either
|
|
|
Let us hope the choice of Manager is Roy Hodgson.
|
|
|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
I don't think there's much argument that another manager would have gotten more points than Roy with the current squad, but is there anyone arguing that we've seen anything resembling entertainment for most of this season? We've also had Lady Luck very much on our side, sometimes to hilarious levels like the Brighton game i would argue that is very much not the case given (arguably) our entire 1st choice defence has spent almost the whole season injured bar right back...weve played a midfielder as CB all season, and yes weve taken some hidings but on the whole managed really well. im pretty sure we've had the worst injury record this season alongside liverpool. then we lost wilf for a period of covid & injury.
‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway |
|
|
Originally posted by kev64
We’re in a race to 17th place .. terrible game 1-0 loss. Still think this Kev after the weekends results?
|
|
|
Originally posted by braunstoneagle
i would argue that is very much not the case given (arguably) our entire 1st choice defence has spent almost the whole season injured bar right back...weve played a midfielder as CB all season, and yes weve taken some hidings but on the whole managed really well. im pretty sure we've had the worst injury record this season alongside liverpool. then we lost wilf for a period of covid & injury. Agreed but I think questions should be asked how/why we pick up so many injuries in training, did Wilf have COVID? wasn’t aware of thst Edited by Spiderman (09 May 2021 5.50pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by braunstoneagle
i would argue that is very much not the case given (arguably) our entire 1st choice defence has spent almost the whole season injured bar right back...weve played a midfielder as CB all season, and yes weve taken some hidings but on the whole managed really well. im pretty sure we've had the worst injury record this season alongside liverpool. then we lost wilf for a period of covid & injury. Injuries wise that's a fair point, but I meant the performances themselves, as nearly every club has had some serious injury problems, including most of them around us. You look back over the season and the only games we really looked comfortable winners was against a very weak Sheffield Utd and WBA, easily the two worst teams by a country mile. Our first two wins of the season were basically us taking advantage of two teams who had little to no preseason and so were half asleep. The win against Newcastle was fortuitous (although they were probably lucky to beat us in the reverse fixture) and the win against Brighton was hilarious. But for a dubious offside the Leeds win might not have gone our way and many of the draws were basically down to motm performances from Vicente (Everton and Spurs being notable examples). Even the 5-1 win against WBA was heavily influenced by a soft red card for Perreira. The only significant thing I remember going against us was the Ward handball, which at that point was technically a handball. Considering our ageing and depleted squad our points tally is undoubtedly commendable, but my point was that I look at our squad and the way we are playing and I think we are in trouble if we don't make some changes as we got the rub of the green in many games when we didn't always deserve it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
Injuries wise that's a fair point, but I meant the performances themselves, as nearly every club has had some serious injury problems, including most of them around us. You look back over the season and the only games we really looked comfortable winners was against a very weak Sheffield Utd and WBA, easily the two worst teams by a country mile. Our first two wins of the season were basically us taking advantage of two teams who had little to no preseason and so were half asleep. The win against Newcastle was fortuitous (although they were probably lucky to beat us in the reverse fixture) and the win against Brighton was hilarious. But for a dubious offside the Leeds win might not have gone our way and many of the draws were basically down to motm performances from Vicente (Everton and Spurs being notable examples). Even the 5-1 win against WBA was heavily influenced by a soft red card for Perreira. The only significant thing I remember going against us was the Ward handball, which at that point was technically a handball. Considering our ageing and depleted squad our points tally is undoubtedly commendable, but my point was that I look at our squad and the way we are playing and I think we are in trouble if we don't make some changes as we got the rub of the green in many games when we didn't always deserve it. Are you Mark Lawrenson in disguise?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Davepalace707
Are you Mark Lawrenson in disguise? no he's spot on, doesn't make him disloyal because he's over 16 years of age
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.