You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Eddie Howe now favourite
November 12 2026 2.55pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Eddie Howe now favourite


Page 41 of 48 < 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 >
Melbourne Eagle Flag Melbourne 07 May 21 1.51pm

Could the delay in an announcement being made - whether Roy is staying or not - be dependent on us being mathematically safe in the PL?

Yes, I know we are almost certainly safe but maybe a new appointment is being delayed for this very reason?

FWIW I think we need a change, although a risk.

Edited by Melbourne Eagle (07 May 2021 1.52pm)

 

eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 07 May 21 2.01pm

Originally posted by Painter

If Howe has the job, why are we showing Lampard around the training ground?

Not according to Davey Provan . . .

[Link]

Done deal apparently, kind of, ish, maybe, deffo, sort of . . .

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Mstrobez Flag 07 May 21 3.03pm

Originally posted by Melbourne Eagle

Could the delay in an announcement being made - whether Roy is staying or not - be dependent on us being mathematically safe in the PL?

Yes, I know we are almost certainly safe but maybe a new appointment is being delayed for this very reason?

FWIW I think we need a change, although a risk.

Edited by Melbourne Eagle (07 May 2021 1.52pm)

So basically we need to take a risk. Why? And to achieve what? We’re comfortably mid table, nowhere near relegation at any point this season or the couple prior.

If we take a "risk", fail to invest and start trying to play like City, we will either go down or be in deep trouble and have to bring in a firefighter manager (who’ll probably spend the next 5 years of our transfer budget on firefighter players). And for what? Even if we do spend this summer - why doesn’t Roy get to work with the investment. After what he’s achieved at the club, doesn’t he deserve that?

 


We're the Arthur over ere!

TheBigToePunt Flag 07 May 21 4.50pm

Originally posted by Mstrobez

So basically we need to take a risk. Why? And to achieve what? We’re comfortably mid table, nowhere near relegation at any point this season or the couple prior.

If we take a "risk", fail to invest and start trying to play like City, we will either go down or be in deep trouble and have to bring in a firefighter manager (who’ll probably spend the next 5 years of our transfer budget on firefighter players). And for what? Even if we do spend this summer - why doesn’t Roy get to work with the investment. After what he’s achieved at the club, doesn’t he deserve that?

Very good post. To continue your line of argument, either we have money to buy a few new, better, quicker, probably younger players who will improve the team, or we don't.

If we do then why shouldn't Hodgson have the benefit of the investment? He is being judged for the awful football we play but has had next to no money spent on the team. Most posters who are 'Roy out' stress that they have no unreasonable expectations regarding sexy football at Palace, and just want a bit more entertainment and endeavour. Why wouldn't a reinforced team under Hodgson provide that?

If we don't have the money for any new players then all the more reason to keep Roy.

 

Mstrobez Flag 08 May 21 8.38am

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

Very good post. To continue your line of argument, either we have money to buy a few new, better, quicker, probably younger players who will improve the team, or we don't.

If we do then why shouldn't Hodgson have the benefit of the investment? He is being judged for the awful football we play but has had next to no money spent on the team. Most posters who are 'Roy out' stress that they have no unreasonable expectations regarding sexy football at Palace, and just want a bit more entertainment and endeavour. Why wouldn't a reinforced team under Hodgson provide that?

If we don't have the money for any new players then all the more reason to keep Roy.

No reason at all. For me, the real reason Roy's position is in doubt leading into next season (if it is) is a result of either one of two things:

1) he is genuinely retiring
2) Parish knows that if the discontent of the fans boils over, Roys' position will quickly become untenable & things could get ugly.

I don't mean this in an insulting way but I've genuinely never been so disappointed at the conduct of our fans. Roy has conducted himself honourably throughout and has done an excellent job - he should really go down in the clubs history for it.

Instead, he's being hounded out. And for what? As you said, he's earned the investment, and if we're not investing then Roy is absolutely the man for the job.


Edited by Mstrobez (08 May 2021 8.41am)

 


We're the Arthur over ere!

NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 08 May 21 9.41am

Originally posted by Mstrobez

No reason at all. For me, the real reason Roy's position is in doubt leading into next season (if it is) is a result of either one of two things:

1) he is genuinely retiring
2) Parish knows that if the discontent of the fans boils over, Roys' position will quickly become untenable & things could get ugly.

I don't mean this in an insulting way but I've genuinely never been so disappointed at the conduct of our fans. Roy has conducted himself honourably throughout and has done an excellent job - he should really go down in the clubs history for it.

Instead, he's being hounded out. And for what? As you said, he's earned the investment, and if we're not investing then Roy is absolutely the man for the job.


Edited by Mstrobez (08 May 2021 8.41am)

I'm in agreement with your last 2 posts, which by the way would be perfectly at home in the ' Roy Out ' thread !

At some point we will need to continue without the safe pair of hands that Roy undoubtably is.

From my perspective, now feels the right time. Roy can walk away with his dignity intact and that's the least he deserves.

A new man ( or woman, this is 2021 ! ) can come in on a longer contact than the rolling 12 month deal that Hodgson has been on, and the club can re-set itself to start thinking longer term as opposed to the season by season approach currently employed.

I suspect that Palace will attempt to do that
via some shrewd and cheap player acquisitions and introducing a few of the more talented youngsters.

 


Old, Ungifted and White

ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 08 May 21 10.01am

I'm not anti-Roy but some of the limp thrashings this year have been appalling, Liverpool, Chelsea and City away, and Burnley at home, and though Roy's hands have been tied to a great extent, Parish will have hated those performances as much as the rest of us, and I think that's what's ultimately convinced Parish it's the right time for a change. We need new, younger, faster players and a manager who has a clear idea what they want to put in place for the next three or four years, and that man can't be Roy.

 

kev64 Flag Cambs 08 May 21 10.08am

We’re in a race to 17th place .. terrible game 1-0 loss.

 

Elphers40 Flag Sunny South Coast 08 May 21 12.26pm

Originally posted by taylors lovechild

I don't think there's much argument that another manager would have gotten more points than Roy with the current squad, but is there anyone arguing that we've seen anything resembling entertainment for most of this season? We've also had Lady Luck very much on our side, sometimes to hilarious levels like the Brighton game It is a risk to change Roy, just as it is to shake up the squad, but in my view we have been going downhill the last 18 months and we need a fresh perspective. Mainly, I'm just not sure I can bare another season of 30% possession and three shots a game.

100% on the money.

 

Vaibow Flag vancouver/croydon 09 May 21 4.59am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

No but I wasn't comparing the two but merely addressing one single point that you made (many weeks ago)

don't care if it was today or last year... was a poor comparison.

 


This was once a quality forum....

Midlands Eagle Flag 09 May 21 7.10am

Originally posted by Vaibow


don't care if it was today or last year... was a poor comparison.

You argue just like my wife and she's never wrong either

 

beak Flag croydon 09 May 21 8.00am

Let us hope the choice of Manager is Roy Hodgson.

 

braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 09 May 21 11.24am

Originally posted by taylors lovechild

I don't think there's much argument that another manager would have gotten more points than Roy with the current squad, but is there anyone arguing that we've seen anything resembling entertainment for most of this season? We've also had Lady Luck very much on our side, sometimes to hilarious levels like the Brighton game It is a risk to change Roy, just as it is to shake up the squad, but in my view we have been going downhill the last 18 months and we need a fresh perspective. Mainly, I'm just not sure I can bare another season of 30% possession and three shots a game.

i would argue that is very much not the case given (arguably) our entire 1st choice defence has spent almost the whole season injured bar right back...weve played a midfielder as CB all season, and yes weve taken some hidings but on the whole managed really well.

im pretty sure we've had the worst injury record this season alongside liverpool.

then we lost wilf for a period of covid & injury.

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Gary St.Andrews Flag Kenley 09 May 21 4.35pm

Originally posted by kev64

We’re in a race to 17th place .. terrible game 1-0 loss.

Still think this Kev after the weekends results?

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 09 May 21 5.49pm

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

i would argue that is very much not the case given (arguably) our entire 1st choice defence has spent almost the whole season injured bar right back...weve played a midfielder as CB all season, and yes weve taken some hidings but on the whole managed really well.

im pretty sure we've had the worst injury record this season alongside liverpool.

then we lost wilf for a period of covid & injury.

Agreed but I think questions should be asked how/why we pick up so many injuries in training, did Wilf have COVID? wasn’t aware of thst

Edited by Spiderman (09 May 2021 5.50pm)

 

Putitout Flag Oxford 10 May 21 5.14pm

Just watched Hodgson, talking to Sky,, and it left me wondering if it is him that is not committing until the outcome of what he freely says will be an inevitable change in some personnel.
As he says there is a sound base, for the future, even though some old faces will go. Is he waiting to see what the quality of the replacements are before he is prepared to commit ?
This isn’t all together a new situation for him, as at the end of other seasons he has expressed a need for reinforcements, and maybe was led to believe he would get them. It’s my feeling he must have been left more than a little disappointed . On the basis of that could he be more cautious this time,? Even though there will be holes to fill, is it a case of what they get filled with that makes him hold his cards close until he knows for sure that he gets some decent signings to work with.?

 

taylors lovechild Flag 10 May 21 6.10pm

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

i would argue that is very much not the case given (arguably) our entire 1st choice defence has spent almost the whole season injured bar right back...weve played a midfielder as CB all season, and yes weve taken some hidings but on the whole managed really well.

im pretty sure we've had the worst injury record this season alongside liverpool.

then we lost wilf for a period of covid & injury.

Injuries wise that's a fair point, but I meant the performances themselves, as nearly every club has had some serious injury problems, including most of them around us. You look back over the season and the only games we really looked comfortable winners was against a very weak Sheffield Utd and WBA, easily the two worst teams by a country mile. Our first two wins of the season were basically us taking advantage of two teams who had little to no preseason and so were half asleep. The win against Newcastle was fortuitous (although they were probably lucky to beat us in the reverse fixture) and the win against Brighton was hilarious.

But for a dubious offside the Leeds win might not have gone our way and many of the draws were basically down to motm performances from Vicente (Everton and Spurs being notable examples). Even the 5-1 win against WBA was heavily influenced by a soft red card for Perreira. The only significant thing I remember going against us was the Ward handball, which at that point was technically a handball.

Considering our ageing and depleted squad our points tally is undoubtedly commendable, but my point was that I look at our squad and the way we are playing and I think we are in trouble if we don't make some changes as we got the rub of the green in many games when we didn't always deserve it.

 

Davepalace707 Flag Northumberland 10 May 21 7.21pm

Originally posted by taylors lovechild

Injuries wise that's a fair point, but I meant the performances themselves, as nearly every club has had some serious injury problems, including most of them around us. You look back over the season and the only games we really looked comfortable winners was against a very weak Sheffield Utd and WBA, easily the two worst teams by a country mile. Our first two wins of the season were basically us taking advantage of two teams who had little to no preseason and so were half asleep. The win against Newcastle was fortuitous (although they were probably lucky to beat us in the reverse fixture) and the win against Brighton was hilarious.

But for a dubious offside the Leeds win might not have gone our way and many of the draws were basically down to motm performances from Vicente (Everton and Spurs being notable examples). Even the 5-1 win against WBA was heavily influenced by a soft red card for Perreira. The only significant thing I remember going against us was the Ward handball, which at that point was technically a handball.

Considering our ageing and depleted squad our points tally is undoubtedly commendable, but my point was that I look at our squad and the way we are playing and I think we are in trouble if we don't make some changes as we got the rub of the green in many games when we didn't always deserve it.

Are you Mark Lawrenson in disguise?

 

ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 10 May 21 9.32pm

Originally posted by Davepalace707

Are you Mark Lawrenson in disguise?

no he's spot on, doesn't make him disloyal because he's over 16 years of age

 

pompeyeagle Flag Relocated to Shropshire 10 May 21 10.09pm

What really concerns me is we have a massive rebuilding job and we won’t have the money to do it. I want Roy to go but I’m not sure how many potential managers will fancy it. We will have to rely on a couple of signings and a couple of loans. The kids have obviously looked very impressive but they won’t be ready for Premier League football for a couple of years so next season could be very difficult. Lampard has shown that when things start to go wrong he’s not got the experience to know what to do. I don’t think Dyche will leave Burnley so Eddie Howe is our best option in my opinion.

 

Page 41 of 48 < 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Eddie Howe now favourite