This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Because it impacts us. If Trump gets in quite significantly, especially if he pulls back from NATO and cosies up to Putin again. So what are we expected to do about it? If Americans started advising British voters they wouldn't get much of a hearing.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Because it impacts us. If Trump gets in quite significantly, especially if he pulls back from NATO and cosies up to Putin again. And if France pulls out of NATO (as reportedly the lead figure in the winning coalition has stated he would do)?…
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So what are we expected to do about it? If Americans started advising British voters they wouldn't get much of a hearing. Didn’t Obama state that the UK shouldn’t leave the EU ahead of the Brexit vote?
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
Didn’t Obama state that the UK shouldn’t leave the EU ahead of the Brexit vote? He did but I meant random posters on a football site.
|
|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Harris hasn't been to Europe either........what an interview If Trump stays on policies and failures of Biden and Dems he will win I don't think the swing states will go for a vacuous Commifornian, a l,ot of her past record will come out now from her time as " prosecutor ", she was an administrator for most of her time Edited by HKOwen (27 Jul 2024 11.22am) She done jailed all those black folk.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
BBC's thoughts on how Trump will go after Harris. It's not a bad assessment as they do acknowledge her short comings.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It’s no more “all true” than any statement that Trump makes! Which is unsurprising given where it originates. It’s a propaganda hit piece from a right wing website. So transparently so it will fool nobody but those already determined to vote for Trump. They don’t matter in this election any more than the determined anti-Trumpers. Harris will bring out the youth vote. She will galvanise the urban female vote. She will swing some of the undecided independents. It may not be enough, but it could be. Which looks a whole lot better than it was only a few days ago. The majority of statements are factually correct. I’m not attributing any virtues to Trump or right wing media, but merely saying that dispite Joe addressing the nation with “would I lie to you the American people”, the Dems lie and cheat as well!!! Listin to media this is not the case as they are the virtuous party who can do or tell no evil.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Houston Eagle
The majority of statements are factually correct. I’m not attributing any virtues to Trump or right wing media, but merely saying that dispite Joe addressing the nation with “would I lie to you the American people”, the Dems lie and cheat as well!!! Listin to media this is not the case as they are the virtuous party who can do or tell no evil. Every politician in any country can be accused of lying. In truth almost everyone alive could be at some time, over something. Politicians who hold power cannot sometimes tell the whole truth for reasons of national security or to avoid compromising an investigation. Opposition politicians lie to deceive and make promises that they know cannot be fulfilled. It’s all a matter of degrees and on what scale you value those degrees. Lies, as with beauty, are in the perception of the holder. So the question is not going to be whether one group or the other thinks the other is lying. They both will. It’s how the group in the middle react. If Harris can be presented as a fresher, younger and dynamic alternative to the old men of the recent past, get out the young and active female vote, then there is every chance that her baggage will prove less weighty than Trump’s.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Every politician in any country can be accused of lying. In truth almost everyone alive could be at some time, over something. Politicians who hold power cannot sometimes tell the whole truth for reasons of national security or to avoid compromising an investigation. Opposition politicians lie to deceive and make promises that they know cannot be fulfilled. It’s all a matter of degrees and on what scale you value those degrees. Lies, as with beauty, are in the perception of the holder. So the question is not going to be whether one group or the other thinks the other is lying. They both will. It’s how the group in the middle react. If Harris can be presented as a fresher, younger and dynamic alternative to the old men of the recent past, get out the young and active female vote, then there is every chance that her baggage will prove less weighty than Trump’s. So the dems were full blow lying when trump was the president as you just stated about the opposition. Trump being in power and I paraphrase you, was lying a little maybe to protect national security or not to compromise any investigations.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
So the dems were full blow lying when trump was the president as you just stated about the opposition. Trump being in power and I paraphrase you, was lying a little maybe to protect national security or not to compromise any investigations. I didn’t say anything of the sort. As well you know. Accusations of lying doesn’t mean they are true. There is absolutely no need to tell lies about Trump. You have only to watch and listen to him to know that almost everything he says has little or no factual basis. So the Democrats aren’t lying about him. They are simply reporting on him. Lies can be told about many things. They can be excused if national security or investigations are involved but not when they involve everything that is said. Trump is an exceptional case who clearly has a poor grasp of reality. He seems to think that whatever he says, often on the spur of the moment, is true.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I didn’t say anything of the sort. As well you know. Accusations of lying doesn’t mean they are true. There is absolutely no need to tell lies about Trump. You have only to watch and listen to him to know that almost everything he says has little or no factual basis. So the Democrats aren’t lying about him. They are simply reporting on him. Lies can be told about many things. They can be excused if national security or investigations are involved but not when they involve everything that is said. Trump is an exceptional case who clearly has a poor grasp of reality. He seems to think that whatever he says, often on the spur of the moment, is true. If he thinks it's true then is he lying?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
If he thinks it's true then is he lying?
I don’t though think he does. I think he is misrepresenting what was said.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t though think he does. I think he is misrepresenting what was said. So when you said He seems to think that whatever he says, often on the spur of the moment, is true. You didn't mean that he believes it's true.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So when you said He seems to think that whatever he says, often on the spur of the moment, is true. You didn't mean that he believes it's true. That was directed at the poster. Not at Trump. I can see though how that might be misinterpreted for which I apologise.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
For those who think my views on Trump are unusual and not shared by Americans who must know better. Or indeed by some traditional Republican voters should watch this:- Or try this withering analysis:- Edited by Wisbech Eagle (29 Jul 2024 12.02am) So what? Two left leaning outlets (TYT is the equivalent of a left wing Fox News) don't like Donald Trump. How earth shattering.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
For those who think my views on Trump are unusual and not shared by Americans who must know better. Or indeed by some traditional Republican voters should watch this:- Or try this withering analysis:- Edited by Wisbech Eagle (29 Jul 2024 12.02am)
Laughable
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So what? Two left leaning outlets (TYT is the equivalent of a left wing Fox News) don't like Donald Trump. How earth shattering. The people in the first are not left leaning at all! They are all traditional Republicans who voted for Trump in 2020 but won’t this time. Listen to their reasoning, which chimes with many of the things I am saying. Who published it is irrelevant. That the second is made by an outlet which has always opposed Trump is true, but to describe them as “left leaning” is a stretch. More important are the points being made, which are both hard hitting and have the truth running strongly in them. If the many Americans who were deeply concerned about having to make a choice between Biden and Trump see these kind of videos then now having Harris as the alternative to Trump is going to be reassuring.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.