You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic
October 31 2024 10.56pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Does Olise have a buy out Clause- Yes or No? (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 43 of 55 < 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 >

Topic Locked

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 16 Aug 23 11.36am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by madcap_v2

With Chelsea having a bloated squad with many in that position. Could it be possible Olise is loanded back to us?

Reasonable thought but if he is sold do we really want him back merely to rehabilitate and get back up to speed?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 16 Aug 23 11.48am Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Reasonable thought but if he is sold do we really want him back merely to rehabilitate and get back up to speed?

I think, if he's going to be loaned out, once fully fit(people still forget he's injured), it'll be to Strasbourg & PV.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
becky Flag over the moon 16 Aug 23 11.51am Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

If the rumour that he is autistic is true, then this move could well backfire as one of the usual main requirements of dealing with autism is stability & routine.

It could well be that he didn't do so well at his former clubs because of the way he was handled or treated, but was better 'managed' at Palace with a proper understanding of his 'needs'. If this were so, a change of routine and attitude at Chelsea (or wherever) could well set him back - especially if he is also having to cope with recovery from a fairly serious injury.

Just a thought...but time will tell.

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post
Hudsoneagle Flag 16 Aug 23 11.55am Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

Lot of sadness at the prospect of losing Olise so soon into his career with us. It’s a difficult time when so many players are linked with moves away. There are very good players out there though. The top teams in the prem are happy to prove time after time that it’s clubs like Palace and Brighton etc that can go out and find players good enough for their teams. So we should be confident we can find some good players to come in and help us have a good season.

We will be making 4 times as much as we paid when we sell Olise and He’s injured and can’t help the team currently.

It’s time to see palace go out and get two wide players like Zaha and Bolasie and bring some flair back to Selhurst!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Aug 23 12.00pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Frickin Saweet


he was dumped by Arsenal, Chelsea and City as a youngster and was playing for a mediocre Reading when we picked him up. Hardly evidence of being told he's the most talented and beautiful youngster. Rather he's been told many times over that he's not good enough. He's also spoken about wondering whether he would make it after several rejections, and finding new confidence at a lower level with Reading. So none of those facts really fit your narrative.

But didn't he also make claims of aspirations to play at the very top and a career path to support that trajectory? That would support his heart not being at Palace.

There's also the addition of a release clause to his contract which wouldn't be there were there not an expectation of a 'bigger' club coming for him? That would support him never wanting to stay here and expecting to move on to 'bigger' things.

Didn't he also delete all Palace stuff off his Instagram the other day? That would support any notion of little sentiment towards the club and perhaps even insult.

Has there not been involvement in the courting process with Chelsea, would have to take two to tango? If there is any wrongdoing here, whether legally found to be or not, that would support an arrogance to slightly break the rules to get what he wanted, a move away from Palace.

Wouldn't fit the narrative you've based around a singular statement. Factual circumstances in somebody's life do not bear any influence on what they are told or not either. So that's not a 'fact' in your argument.

That is all in response of course if you took my post literally and did not read it as intended. I could be wrong on all the above however - perhaps we insisted on a release cause against his wishes, he might have said he was happy here and not looking to move on any time soon, the whole Chelsea thing might come as a shock to him and perhaps there is an innocent explanation to him deleting all the Palace content on his social media?

I'm not claiming any of this as fact and if incorrect I am happy to be presented with the evidence.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
The Beger Flag Croydon 16 Aug 23 12.13pm Send a Private Message to The Beger Add The Beger as a friend

Interesting video by HLTCO:

[Link]

Might help explain this a bit better.

 


I am not a bot. No, seriously, I'm not.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Putitout Flag Oxford 16 Aug 23 12.22pm Send a Private Message to Putitout Add Putitout as a friend

There is little doubt Chelsea have been less than straight with Palace. It’s now clear the OPs question has been answered, Olise had a £35 mill get out clause . Some on here made the point early in the saga, if it was only that amount why wasn’t the deal done it was a give away at that money. Well Chelsea why wasn’t it done.? We did the deal early with Reading, Liverpool went straight in for Mac Allister, most of these clauses are opened early in a window, and so they should be if the selling club is not going to be hung on a string. This deal seems to be a bit like Bairstows stumping by Australia, legal but leaves a bad taste.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
The Dolphin Flag 16 Aug 23 12.25pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

I obviously don't understand FFP because I fail to see how Chelsea can spend so much money.
I also don't understand the rules on squad size and players being loaned out?
Man City do their thing but they trim their squad and also most buys end up playing.
Olise is making a massive mistake in my opinion but it is what it is and there is nothing we can do but moan about it.

I just hope we get the whole sum upfront and that we reinvest it wisely asap.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Aug 23 12.34pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by The Beger

Interesting video by HLTCO:

[Link]

Might help explain this a bit better.

Only watched first half of it so far but thank for posting Beger, great vid.

Essentially, yes MO had no intention of staying ("stepping stone" ), backed himself to play at highest level and we were unlikely to ever have signed him without release clause, as others have suggested.

Also a suggestion from HLTCO that we will now be in for a 'higher calibre' of player than the likes of CHO and Gray we've been linked with. I really do fail to believe this which is based on nothing but anxiety for me. Let's hope so nonetheless.

Edited by Nicholas91 (16 Aug 2023 12.37pm)

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
thegreatlardino Flag crawley/selsey 16 Aug 23 12.36pm Send a Private Message to thegreatlardino Add thegreatlardino as a friend

Just seen the HLTCO video, makes total sense sadly. I think Olise / agent are being very clever having this release clause, it is possible we would never have signed him without this.
I am sure its not the last time we will be screwed by the bigger clubs, we just have to put up with it the way the PL is going.

 


Sometimes I set out for Ludlow
Sometimes I end up in Chepstow

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Midlands Eagle Flag 16 Aug 23 12.45pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Putitout

Some on here made the point early in the saga, if it was only that amount why wasn’t the deal done it was a give away at that money.

The rumour mill states that we insisted that full payment be made up front whereas Chelsea wanted terms so that they had cash left over to buy a few more players

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
radicalsteve Flag ottawa 16 Aug 23 1.39pm Send a Private Message to radicalsteve Add radicalsteve as a friend

We may be constrained on the buy-out clause pricing, but good point on the terms and conditions - upfront cash gives the club better options for improving the squad before the window closes.

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

The rumour mill states that we insisted that full payment be made up front whereas Chelsea wanted terms so that they had cash left over to buy a few more players

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 43 of 55 < 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic