This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Ward -Dann - Delaney - Sakho - PVA McArthur - Milivojevic Zaha - Schlupp Benteke Almost certainly won't be the team but I'd like to see it at some point. Edited by Canterbury Palace (01 Feb 2017 2.59pm)
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mad4palace
4 May 2013: Crystal Palace 3 - 2 Peterborough That was the last league game we won without Puncheon. Trying to get my head around this. What exactly does this mean? He's played in so many of the games that we haven't won so surely it means nothing?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
If all fit then this would be my 4-4-1-1 My belief is that if Luka (I will learn how to spell his surname at some point) is playing the defensive midfield role then we do not need 3 centrebacks, well certainly not against the lower teams at home anyway. Hennessey Ward Dann Sakho PVA Luka Zaha Puncheon McArthur Schlupp
I can also see this system working if Remy plays at the expense of Puncheon and Cabaye drops back into midfield proper. I believe this set up plays to the strengths of the guys in those positions. I agree there is a time and a place to play 5 at the back, but Sunderland at home is probably not one of them.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
12 players, sneaky......
That's Life |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by gambler
Trying to get my head around this. What exactly does this mean? He's played in so many of the games that we haven't won so surely it means nothing? It's pretty meaningless I agree. Plus, if you wanted to, you could suggest that maybe it means he under performs in too many games.
Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
Ward -Dann - Delaney - Sakho - PVA McArthur - Milivojevic Zaha - Schlupp Benteke Almost certainly won't be the team but I'd like to see it at some point.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by gambler
Trying to get my head around this. What exactly does this mean? He's played in so many of the games that we haven't won so surely it means nothing? We have only won premier league matches when Punch plays. We also very rarely win when Cabaye is on the pitch at 90 minutes. He had been subbed again last night and we won.
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
No room for Kelly ? Lol
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by bexleydave
It looks more like a formation lined up to face chariots. Or an arrow head pointing at the goal marching at ramming speed to the sound of the HF drum......so no back passes allowed.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Mad4palace
4 May 2013: Crystal Palace 3 - 2 Peterborough That was the last league game we won without Puncheon. Technically it would be the league play offs (or final), but disturbingly that could be true, if you drop FA Cup games. I certainly couldn't find anything that suggested otherwise. He even featured in Holloways only stand out win, against Sunderland.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Much as I'd like to see Luka play (he should be fit after all) I think Sam will stick with the team he played against Bournemouth. His primary goal is to keep clean sheets and three CB's is his recipe for that. Even though we are at home Sam will be perfectly happy with another 2-0.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
chateauferret ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Direwolf
Much as I'd like to see Luka play (he should be fit after all) I think Sam will stick with the team he played against Bournemouth. His primary goal is to keep clean sheets and three CB's is his recipe for that. Even though we are at home Sam will be perfectly happy with another 2-0. But I would think that if he again needs to replace McArthur later on as has been the case with his work rate we will be bringing on Milevojevic and not Ledley.
============ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.