This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Anecdotes don't cut it. It's just as likely because it's harder to over eat on a vegan diet. Go on, have a Big Mac. It won't kill you. Eat them regularly enough and they will - slower than cigarettes but the effects of eating enough of them will contribute to the increased likelihood of developing many avoidable diseases. Edited by sitdownstandup (05 Sep 2017 8.51pm)
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Are you living on 'planet pointless' or something? I can't see much in what you said here that I'd disagree with....but it relates little to what I said. What do you think I'm saying that is wrong? What our body is designed for by nature and how much the human life can be stretched to are two separate things. I addressed one of them. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 8.51pm) if we are designed to eat meat why dont we salivate at the sight of roadkill? Im pretty sure a truly carnivorous animal would eat that animal raw. Humans have to jump through hoops to eat dead animals. Farming them, catching them, cleaning them, cooking them. Most true carnivorous animals dont bother with all that stuff they just catch them, kill them and eat them. Herbivorous animals eat vegetables and fruits no problems. Why do we go through so much hassle to eat dead animals when the body will survive without the related health problems by eating a healthy vegan diet as prescribed by a growing number of doctors. Edited by sitdownstandup (05 Sep 2017 8.56pm)
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Just because you can't answer my questions and/or are even afraid to attempt to try you decide instead to deflect with even more meaningless nonsense.
Mmmm....I think you have now...but your response had so little to do with what I posted that I doubt it. It laughable took the view that I disagreed with the idea that seafood was less healthy than meat, when this wasn't the point I'd made. If you had originally read the actual post then that response is indeed embarrassing Kermy...but worse things happen at sea...so to speak. What was embarrassing about what I said exactly?
Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 8.56pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
The point is that there are things that we don't need to be doing that can help us live longer, healthier lives. Scientists are speculating that consumption of the modern processed / meat diet will mean that the current generation of kids could be the first to live shorter lives than their parents. So we should ban cars, aircraft, volcanos? What I'm trying to say is that we must put these things into a sensible context. People, in general, eat too much and are getting increasingly fat. The best advice for many people is to eat less and exercise more. That makes sense. More specific advise is less useful.
|
|
|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
if we are designed to eat meat why dont we salivate at the sight of roadkill? Im pretty sure a truly carnivorous animal would eat that animal raw. Humans have to jump through hoops to eat dead animals. Farming them, catching them, cleaning them, cooking them. Most true carnivorous animals dont bother with all that stuff they just catch them, kill them and eat them. Herbivorous animals eat vegetables and fruits no problems. Why do we go through so much hassle to eat dead animals when the body will survive without the related health problems by eating a healthy vegan diet as prescribed by a growing number of doctors. Edited by sitdownstandup (05 Sep 2017 8.56pm) If you were back in time with our ancient ancestors, living in caves, without much meat to hunt you would probably take that dead animal....obviously not killed by a car back then....you'd take it and if it was fresh enough, you would probably cook it. Like I say, our teeth are designed to eat many types of foods......Living into old age and concerning yourself with the most healthy things to eat was hardly more important than not starving. The reason you don't salivate at the sight of roadkill is probably in part because you have a frontal cortex and can reason that you don't need it...Humans aren't meat only mammals anyway.....Even well fed dogs leave road kill and they don't have much of a frontal cortex.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
There is a growing amount of evidence to support the idea that eating meat is destroying health but people will choose to believe whatever they like. Edited by sitdownstandup (05 Sep 2017 9.04pm) Well, eating too much meat certainly. As for criticizing other people's beliefs....well possibly, but how are you any different in this yourself? Are your beliefs solely dictated by the science on this or do you pick and choose what you want to follow? Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 9.08pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If you were back in time with our ancient ancestors, living in caves, without much meat to hunt you would probably take that dead animal....obviously not killed by a car back then....you'd take it and if it was fresh enough, you would probably cook it. Like I say, our teeth are designed to eat many types of foods. The reason you don't salivate at the sight of roadkill is probably in part because you have a frontal cortex and can reason that you don't need it...Humans aren't meat only mammals anyway.....Even well fed dogs leave road kill and they don't have much of a frontal cortex. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 9.03pm) what if the human was starving and did need it? A hungry carnvivore would eat it and would more than likely not suffer any ill effects. Humans could cook the food and still suffer disease if it wasnt properly cleaned and cooked. Humans are better off eating fruits, veg, grains, cereals etc.
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well, eating too much meat certainly. As for criticizing other people's beliefs....well possibly, but how are you any different in this yourself? Are your beliefs solely dictated by the science on this or do you pick and choose what you want to follow? Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 9.08pm) its based on the growing amount of evidence supporting plant based diets advocated by doctors and the people reporting health benefits from switching to them.
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
what if the human was starving and did need it? A hungry carnvivore would eat it and would more than likely not suffer any ill effects. Humans could cook the food and still suffer disease if it wasnt properly cleaned and cooked. Humans are better off eating fruits, veg, grains, cereals etc. Not if they lived in ice age Europe. We have survived because we are adaptable.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Not if they lived in ice age Europe. We have survived because we are adaptable. we dont live in ice age europe, its easy to eat a vegan diet now and still survive.
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
its based on the growing amount of evidence supporting plant based diets advocated by doctors and the people reporting health benefits from switching to them. Reducing meat intake and eating more veg does not equal becoming a vegan or a vegetarian. You don't seem to grasp the concept of moderation.
|
|
|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
its based on the growing amount of evidence supporting plant based diets advocated by doctors and the people reporting health benefits from switching to them. I'm not going to knock plant based diets. However, that isn't the same as saying people shouldn't eat meat. It's the type of meat and how much. Bacon sandwiches aren't going to help anyone...red meat has a lot of saturated fats but lean chicken is another story. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 9.23pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So we should ban cars, aircraft, volcanos? What I'm trying to say is that we must put these things into a sensible context. People, in general, eat too much and are getting increasingly fat. The best advice for many people is to eat less and exercise more. That makes sense. More specific advise is less useful.
But cutting out meat is good for you directly and good for the environment and is also much healthier ecologically (pigs in North Carolina produce 10x the amount of s*** that the human population does – which gets sprayed untreated onto fields where the toxins wash into the waterways, or the collection ponds just leak directly). The land on which livestock is raised is rendered a toxic wasteland. Conversely, the land on which food crops are grown can be tilled over and used again (with a little rotation for longevity).
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
But cutting out meat is good for you directly and good for the environment and is also much healthier ecologically (pigs in North Carolina produce 10x the amount of s*** that the human population does – which gets sprayed untreated onto fields where the toxins wash into the waterways, or the collection ponds just leak directly). The land on which livestock is raised is rendered a toxic wasteland. Conversely, the land on which food crops are grown can be tilled over and used again (with a little rotation for longevity). and thats without mentioning the important fact that it doesnt cause any cruelty to animals either.
Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping. Hubert Reeves |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
For sure. I would imagine that the normal human condition in pre farming times was hungry and looking for food. We certainly don't need to eat all the food that many do. That does not mean that always being hungry makes for a better life though.
Yeah it's a good point....the body adapts to be more efficient.....but what a miserable way to live long term....hungry and a bit cold.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'm not going to knock plant based diets. However, that isn't the same as saying people shouldn't eat meat. It's the type of meat and how much. Bacon sandwiches aren't going to help anyone...red meat has a lot of saturated fats but lean chicken is another story.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
we dont live in ice age europe, its easy to eat a vegan diet now and still survive. If that's your bag then I commend you.....I couldn't be a vegan myself as I like my dairy stuff....but there's a certain ethical element to veggies. The human body is certainly adapted to eat meat along with the rest of it....but what can be said is that a lot of animal farming is questionable ethically....and sometimes completely terrible no questions at all....I've seen videos showing male chicks being sent into the mincers shortly after birth....I don't sign up for that...no chicken nuggets for me. I do look forward to the day when gene science provides us with quality commercial meat that doesn't involve the butchering of animals. That day is nearly here anyway. Then they will exist in zoos.....also questionable ethically...but less so. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 9.45pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Well, fish and beans also have cholesterol. It's about the type of cholesterol and how much. Chicken is fine and a good source of protein.....many foods are fine in moderation. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Sep 2017 9.49pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.