This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
We didn't even get the upfront 50 million according to SKY. I for one hope he has a nightmare at United. I am a Palace fan, not his dad.
|
|
|
Yup, screwed again Originally posted by PatrickA
Edited by AmericanEagle (26 Jun 2019 2.15pm) Edited by AmericanEagle (26 Jun 2019 2.16pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
We didn't even get the upfront 50 million according to SKY. I for one hope he has a nightmare at United. I am a Palace fan, not his dad. Virtually all deals are money in instalments. Next you’ll be outraged because they didn’t put a whole seasons worth of water on the pitch in one go.
|
|
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
It’s been reported that there is no inclusion of a sell on clause on the AWB deal and no removal of the clause on the Zaha deal. Ok, so let's say Palace value Zaha at £80m. And the sell on would then be in the region of £16m due to Utd. To remove that clause and then demand £45m up front would value AWB at over £60m. It would seem that valuation was higher than Utd. would pay. Yes, I think we did need to generate funds in order to strengthen the squad. There isn't a lot of financial wiggle room at present. The key now is to get the right players in with the funds available. I've said all along that is a concern as I don't think there is widespread confidence in DF and Co. But we now have to wait and see what they come up with. As for Brooks and Maddison, I am sure most clubs in the Premier League including Palace had them somewhere on their radar, but Bournemouth took the plunge and I think he's surpassed expectations at how quickly he's had an impact. Maddison...we were never going to be able to afford £20m odd at that time.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Look, I don’t care that that we are selling him provided the price is right however the current reported price is too low as far as I am concerned. He will be worth £80m by the end of next season. So how much will Trent Alexander-Arnold be worth then?
|
|
|
Originally posted by JohnB
Virtually all deals are money in instalments. Next you’ll be outraged because they didn’t put a whole seasons worth of water on the pitch in one go. You clearly don't understand the difference between instalments and add ons. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (26 Jun 2019 2.46pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Let's also not forget that Hodgson wouldn't let him go out on loan because he wanted to include him in his playing squad. He was being talked about for a while before his debut, but the step up from U23s to the first XI is a big one. Roy could have stuck someone in RB out of position, but he put his faith in AWB. I'm hoping we see another of the graduates step up this season. Kirby seems the most exciting prospect, and Dreher and Flanagan hovering too, plus we have a couple of centre backs such as Woods and Tavares who could get their chance. If AWB goes then let's just focus on the future. I think it's bright
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You clearly don't understand the difference between instalments and add ons. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (26 Jun 2019 2.46pm) I do, which is why I understand it’s 45 million spread over 2 years and 5m in add ons. But no, you’re right, let’s burn the place down!
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
So how much will Trent Alexander-Arnold be worth then? Top two RBs in the country so probably the same. So do you think the lumbering oaf that is Harry Maguire is worth £80m now because that’s the comparison I’m using?
|
|
|
Personally I think DF is getting a bad rap. He's been given very limited funds to work with the past few transfer windows, and I think he's done quite well. Yes, there's been some stinkers (Jach (2.75 mil), probably Soeloth (I think 9 mil), but they haven't broken the bank. And I think we could sell them and recoup most of those fees. There's also been some good ones too. Meyer seems like he has a lot of potential, and was free. Kouyate (10 mil) is a solid midfielder that can fill in for McArthur or Luka. Guaita was a steal (also free). The only transfer that cost more than 10 mil during his tenure was Sakho (26 mil), which I'm not sure he was even responsible for, and is also a great player. Originally posted by NEILLO
Ok, so let's say Palace value Zaha at £80m. And the sell on would then be in the region of £16m due to Utd. To remove that clause and then demand £45m up front would value AWB at over £60m. It would seem that valuation was higher than Utd. would pay. Yes, I think we did need to generate funds in order to strengthen the squad. There isn't a lot of financial wiggle room at present. The key now is to get the right players in with the funds available. I've said all along that is a concern as I don't think there is widespread confidence in DF and Co. But we now have to wait and see what they come up with. As for Brooks and Maddison, I am sure most clubs in the Premier League including Palace had them somewhere on their radar, but Bournemouth took the plunge and I think he's surpassed expectations at how quickly he's had an impact. Maddison...we were never going to be able to afford £20m odd at that time.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
So how much will Trent Alexander-Arnold be worth then? Sorry I should also have clarified that he would not be worth £80m if he was still at Palace, but just because he is a Utd player. It’s the way it works I’m afraid to say.
|
|
|
Originally posted by JohnB
I do, which is why I understand it’s 45 million spread over 2 years and 5m in add ons. But no, you’re right, let’s burn the place down! Nice attempt to cover your mistake. The conditions of the extra 5 million are as yet unknown.
|
|
|
Originally posted by A1969Eagle
I have just read AWB (and its still alot of money to most people) is on £10k a week, the lowest of all Palace 1st team players, why the FUDGE did someone not see last season, his own potential and pay him (get a new contract) similar to LUKA (even as the season ended, sat him down and said we want you to sign a new contract so he would want to stay with deserved package!! We didn't want to keep him or else we would have.
|
|
|
Originally posted by A1969Eagle
I have just read AWB (and its still alot of money to most people) is on £10k a week, the lowest of all Palace 1st team players, why the FUDGE did someone not see last season, his own potential and pay him (get a new contract) similar to LUKA (even as the season ended, sat him down and said we want you to sign a new contract so he would want to stay with deserved package!! He was sold because Palace wanted to sell him not because of the money he is on earning at Palace. Great deal for us and he will be replaced.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EddieMac
He was sold because Palace wanted to sell him not because of the money he is on earning at Palace. Great deal for us and he will be replaced.
We won't replace his quality.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EddieMac
How do you know? When one of the largest clubs in the world wants you to play for them and offers you eight times what you are currently earning then most people will want to leave. Existing contract or not once the player has set his heart on going then it's senseless to try and force him to stay so Palace did their best to maximise the opportunity for themselves
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.