This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Gribbo
Might be appropriate to name the main stand after Roy, born in 1924, and Roy popped up shortly thereafter. Is our club really that tinpot ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by rikz
Is our club really that tinpot ? What's tinpot about honouring a manager who, in terms of keeping Palace in the PL, has made a greater contribution than anyone?
|
|
|
Originally posted by PJEagle
What's tinpot about honouring a manager who, in terms of keeping Palace in the PL, has made a greater contribution than anyone? Don't you worry, Roy & Ray will have a statue placed along the Walk Of Fame leading up to the new stadium, alongside such luminaries as Sir Steve Coppell, Clinton Morrison, Geoff Thomas et al.
|
|
|
I would like Roy to stay on another season but will he bleed the younger players in?
|
|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
I would like Roy to stay on another season but will he bleed the younger players in? Which ones do you think are worth bleeding in bearing in mind Roy's orders from above will be to win as many games as possible
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Which ones do you think are worth bleeding in bearing in mind Roy's orders from above will be to win as many games as possible People like to overcomplicate football. Roy was cautious when he was here before because we had a whole season of fixtures, half against teams who we have no business beating. I didn't like the vibe under Vieira, it had clearly run out of steam and ideas, but our results from the run of fixtures before his departure was what you might expect give or take a few wasted points. When Roy left it felt like it was the right time. This time round, if Roy keeps this form going till the end of the season, it might be a little harder for the next guy. Big shoes to fill.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
I would like Roy to stay on another season but will he bleed the younger players in? I think Roy sees everyone in our squad as a young player .
|
|
|
Arne Slot comes from the same country as a certain De Boer, right?
|
|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
Like on Saturday Roy brings on Tomkins instead of Richards and where's Ahamada gone?
|
|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
Like on Saturday Roy brings on Tomkins instead of Richards and where's Ahamada gone? And when Rak Saki comes back does he get a game or just 5 mins at the end of a match? He is here to get results, I doubt development of inexperienced youngsters is part of his brief.
|
|
|
Originally posted by thai-eagle
Arne Slot comes from the same country as a certain De Boer, right? Yep. His record is good. Not massively experienced but has had success in each he has been at. Has most certainly got a record of getting the players at the clubs playing better than expected.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
People like to overcomplicate football. Roy was cautious when he was here before because we had a whole season of fixtures, half against teams who we have no business beating. I didn't like the vibe under Vieira, it had clearly run out of steam and ideas, but our results from the run of fixtures before his departure was what you might expect give or take a few wasted points. When Roy left it felt like it was the right time. This time round, if Roy keeps this form going till the end of the season, it might be a little harder for the next guy. Big shoes to fill. I do wonder whether Roy would have set the team up any differently from Pat in that tough run of games e.g. Man City at home where we might well have got a point had Olise not made a rash challenge in the box. Roy has undoubtedly brought a change of mood but he has done it against relatively weak opposition. And, when it comes to discussions about boring football we have seen over the years I am surprised that Dougie’s tenure apart from half a season or so never gets a mention. Edited by dg1937 (18 Apr 2023 1.10pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
I like RH, and and the first to admit that it I was wrong, and he has made a tremendous impact upon his return, but 3 games against bottom of the the league oppo is not enough of an indicator to judge exactly where we are. RH has come in, and we are playing with a renewed freedom - but let's not kid ourselves, in those 3 games there were times where we haven't competed and rode our Luck(aka 1st half vs leeds). In our last vs southampton, we didn't look anywhere near the attacking force we were (at times) vs Leeds or Leicester. He's been a breath of fresh air since the times of PV, but lets all remember the lesson Ole Gunnar Solskjær taught ManU fans. It's waaaay to soon, and with our remaining fixtures, the minimum I'd expect is comfortable safety, from any manager worth his salt.
To be fair, we rode our luck under Vieira as well. It's fair to say that Roy has to beat teams below us in the table, and he has a clearly defined target. PV was suffering from no wins syndrome. He had run out of zing. It was clear from his body language. It's tough being the manager when you aren't winning week after week, even if you are playing teams who higher in the league.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dg1937
I do wonder whether Roy would have set the team up any differently from Pat in that tough run of games e.g. Man City at home where we might well have got a point had Olise not made a rash challenge in the box. Roy has undoubtedly brought a change of mood but he has done it against relatively weak opposition. Edited by dg1937 (18 Apr 2023 1.10pm) Roy was predictably and dull at times, but when you have had to sit through Peter Taylor's tenure on cold nights in the Championship, nothing seems that bad.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Roy was predictably and dull at times, but when you have had to sit through Peter Taylor's tenure on cold nights in the Championship, nothing seems that bad. That really was an awful time and for reasons just or not I still have nightmares about Mark Kennedy and Stuart Green being named in a Palace starting line up. Could never quite understand what either of them brought/did etc.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
I like RH, and and the first to admit that it I was wrong, and he has made a tremendous impact upon his return, but 3 games against bottom of the the league oppo is not enough of an indicator to judge exactly where we are. RH has come in, and we are playing with a renewed freedom - but let's not kid ourselves, in those 3 games there were times where we haven't competed and rode our Luck(aka 1st half vs leeds). In our last vs southampton, we didn't look anywhere near the attacking force we were (at times) vs Leeds or Leicester. He's been a breath of fresh air since the times of PV, but lets all remember the lesson Ole Gunnar Solskjær taught ManU fans. It's waaaay to soon, and with our remaining fixtures, the minimum I'd expect is comfortable safety, from any manager worth his salt.
Looking at our remaining fixtures, there's no reason we can't be aiming to hit the high 40s and even the 50 point mark - not because we're suddenly brilliant we're not - the teams we've just played were worse than us) but because all but 2 of our remaining games are against teams currently below us in the table. How near we get to 50 points with Hodgson at the helm will tell us how good his return has been.
|
|
|
Originally posted by rikz
Is our club really that tinpot ? Leeds have the Don Revie stand, a most unpleasant person who walked out on England for Arab money. Roy is a true gent and Palace through and through.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.