This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The ULEZ extension widens the tax on dirty air and should be welcomed. Ultimately, we should be moving towards a full road-pricing system that accounts for the social and environmental costs of driving. Ulez may not be perfect, but it is a step in the right direction towards making the polluter pay. Sunak and Starmer just a couple of snake-oil salesmen, shabby opportunists with no policies except to chase the next vote. I'm sure its implementation will be smooth, not at all costly, or at all likely to be a debacle. Khan is just so competent - his record on everything else he promised does nothing except back that up. This won't rile up voters whatsoever. Everyone loves a green tax. London is so bad it's become like the smog the Limehouse Golem used to hide in. Real pea soupers. Khan to the rescue once again. Like St George killing the Dragon - an analogy I'm sure Khan would be proud of.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I'm sure its implementation will be smooth, not at all costly, or at all likely to be a debacle. Khan is just so competent - his record on everything else he promised does nothing except back that up. This won't rile up voters whatsoever. Everyone loves a green tax. London is so bad it's become like the smog the Limehouse Golem used to hide in. Real pea soupers. Khan to the rescue once again. Like St George killing the Dragon - an analogy I'm sure Khan would be proud of. The Golem problem has eased since their top boy went to Bayern Munich.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The Golem problem has eased since their top boy went to Bayern Munich.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The ULEZ extension widens the tax on dirty air and should be welcomed. Ultimately, we should be moving towards a full road-pricing system that accounts for the social and environmental costs of driving. Ulez may not be perfect, but it is a step in the right direction towards making the polluter pay. Sunak and Starmer just a couple of snake-oil salesmen, shabby opportunists with no policies except to chase the next vote. And you reward your green guests with discounts at your hotel ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It's not so long ago you couldn't drive in the south pole. Thank goodness for climate change At least farming does its bit for climate change Edited by Spiderman (29 Aug 2023 6.14pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
And you reward your green guests with discounts at your hotel ? Of course he does, also cheaper rates for remainers. Well above minimum wage for EU workers as well, no doubt
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The ULEZ extension widens the tax on dirty air and should be welcomed. Ultimately, we should be moving towards a full road-pricing system that accounts for the social and environmental costs of driving. Ulez may not be perfect, but it is a step in the right direction towards making the polluter pay. Sunak and Starmer just a couple of snake-oil salesmen, shabby opportunists with no policies except to chase the next vote.
Edited by YT (29 Aug 2023 6.41pm)
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Khan just aid pay per mile or similar not on the agenda at the next election.
|
|
|
Originally posted by YT
Edited by YT (29 Aug 2023 6.41pm) They are, LGV's & PCV's are charged at over £100 per vehicle per day, bringing materials to build his 'vision' & bringing in money paying pax into London. #notmymayor
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
They are, LGV's & PCV's are charged at over £100 per vehicle per day, bringing materials to build his 'vision' & bringing in money paying pax into London. #notmymayor Sorry, I was actually talking about cars, but I didn't know the detail you've elaborated on, so thanks for the heads-up.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Khan just aid pay per mile or similar not on the agenda at the next election. Ok
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The ULEZ extension widens the tax on dirty air and should be welcomed. Ultimately, we should be moving towards a full road-pricing system that accounts for the social and environmental costs of driving. Ulez may not be perfect, but it is a step in the right direction towards making the polluter pay. Sunak and Starmer just a couple of snake-oil salesmen, shabby opportunists with no policies except to chase the next vote. Yup I hear the pollution in villages such as Chelsfield and Downe is terrible. Still not to worry the public transport is excellent.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by YT
Sorry, I was actually talking about cars, but I didn't know the detail you've elaborated on, so thanks for the heads-up. No problem my friend, I knew what you were alluding to, just thought it was important to mention. It's a tax plain& simple. When did £12.50 make the air cleaner? Where are the giant fans to blow the nasty air in London away? Why does Sad Dick Khunt have a fleet of 8 diesel 'Chelsea Tractors' to run him about, bearing in mind, he doesn't use City Hall. Sorry, had rant moment there, can't stand the tw@t.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
At least farming does its bit for climate change Edited by Spiderman (29 Aug 2023 6.14pm) Factory farming is bad. But it may be best if we do keep farming. Therefore we must change farming methods. The uk led the world. But then we had this government. We now cannot easily prevent importing food produced in far less environmentally aware countries and are presiding over a failing farming system. This is an example of what can be done
|
|
|
With my virtually zero knowledge of farming techniques, practices & the issues that they face, like him or hate him but Jeremy Clarkson with his "On the Farm" program probably did more to highlight some of the problems facing UK farmers today (in a way that ordinary people can understand) than almost any amount of government papers & news bulletins. Originally posted by Mapletree
Factory farming is bad. But it may be best if we do keep farming. Therefore we must change farming methods. The uk led the world. But then we had this government. We now cannot easily prevent importing food produced in far less environmentally aware countries and are presiding over a failing farming system. This is an example of what can be done
|
|
|
Can you imagine the outcry over here.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Sadiq Khan gives his backing to a new railway link connecting Heathrow Airport with south west London, Surrey, Berkshire and Hampshire. This looks quite feasible and unlike HS2 uses existing track except for the terminal 5 to existing south west network, joining at Staines. The sooner they dump HS2 the better, there would be a stop at Old Oak Common if it was ever built, but that's all. Best left to the next labour government.
Agreed however there is one fly in the anointment. Apparently this would require a lot of level crossings in certain places so the company behind the scheme is suggesting tunneling is the answer, paid for by the taxpayer of course. Given how HS2 and Crossrail has been a disaster by both Tories and Labour it does not bode well. Plus Khan couldn't organise a prayer in a Mosque. It would be great if it did happen as one of the legs would mean you could catch a Heathrow train from Waterloo. For those of us south of the river the current journey is a bit of a pain. Anyway the devil is in the detail. Edited by Badger11 (07 Sep 2023 10.28am)
One more point |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.