You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tory conference
June 14 2024 7.15am

Tory conference

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 53 of 60 < 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 >

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 07 Oct 17 3.31pm

Check out @D_Raval’s Tweet:

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 07 Oct 17 3.32pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The Irish are certainly very similar genetically to other 'celtic' types in the rest of Britain. Their impact was signoficant in terms of the friction it caused and the labour force it created.

In terms of numbers, it is the equivalent of about 4 years of current net migration which goes on year after year. If that is the best you can come up with in terms of historic migration parallells then you better give up now.

You and your twin need to understand the difference between absolute and relative. In relative terms the Irish immigration was very high compared to the population at the time.

I see Migration Watch also suffers from that weakness.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 07 Oct 17 4.31pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

You and your twin need to understand the difference between absolute and relative. In relative terms the Irish immigration was very high compared to the population at the time.

I see Migration Watch also suffers from that weakness.

Don't know about clutching at straws - more like clutching at thin air.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 07 Oct 17 5.07pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

You and your twin need to understand the difference between absolute and relative. In relative terms the Irish immigration was very high compared to the population at the time.

I see Migration Watch also suffers from that weakness.

Yes, let's talk about 'relative' and accuracy.

Firstly, the population during the 19th century was rising rapidly. It nearly tripled from ten million to over 30 million. Irish migration to Britain had been going on since the middle ages and even during the famine never got above 805,000. 100,000 were in London.
Many of the famine migrants then moved to America in the following years reducing the Irish net population down to 524,000 by 1921 in a total population of around 43 Million.
So, 1 million Irish never came to came to Britain during the famine and the ones that did come, represented a little over 1% of the British population and a lot of that number left for elsewhere.

Not comparable with the current endless deluge is it.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Oct 2017 5.13pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 07 Oct 17 5.10pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Check out @D_Raval’s Tweet:

Go on then

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 07 Oct 17 6.02pm

Can anyone just roll off the street at the con conference? If these are the people trusted to keep us safe, im getting a tad concerned that they might not be up to the job !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 07 Oct 17 6.40pm

Originally posted by croydon proud

Can anyone just roll off the street at the con conference? If these are the people trusted to keep us safe, im getting a tad concerned that they might not be up to the job !

As long as you are wearing a dark blue suit and a tie.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 07 Oct 17 6.41pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by croydon proud

Can anyone just roll off the street at the con conference? If these are the people trusted to keep us safe, im getting a tad concerned that they might not be up to the job !

One has to register to attend 'Conference' providing personal details and the application needs to be approved by the party and the local Police authority which for Manchester was the Greater Manchester Police.

Edited by Willo (07 Oct 2017 6.41pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 07 Oct 17 6.47pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Yes, let's talk about 'relative' and accuracy.

Firstly, the population during the 19th century was rising rapidly. It nearly tripled from ten million to over 30 million. Irish migration to Britain had been going on since the middle ages and even during the famine never got above 805,000. 100,000 were in London.
Many of the famine migrants then moved to America in the following years reducing the Irish net population down to 524,000 by 1921 in a total population of around 43 Million.
So, 1 million Irish never came to came to Britain during the famine and the ones that did come, represented a little over 1% of the British population and a lot of that number left for elsewhere.

Not comparable with the current endless deluge is it.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Oct 2017 5.13pm)

1%? Interesting maths. I was talking about the 19th Century don't forget. The effect of mass immigration.

If some moved on later that doesn't change the fact they came here first. At a time when, as you rightly say, they would have represented more than 5% of the population and would have arrived in a VERY short period of time. They would also have been heavily concentrated on certain places, like Liverpool.

I put it to you that is far more 'significant' than anything we are seeing now. The equivalent of 3.3m people arriving in the course of seven years in today's money. Current migration is 246k per annum net. So the inflow was roughly twice the current net inflow. And presumably the current inflow will see quite a big reversal as the EU migrants change their approach. So yes, there are lessons to learn from history.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 07 Oct 17 7.08pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

1%? Interesting maths. I was talking about the 19th Century don't forget. The effect of mass immigration.

If some moved on later that doesn't change the fact they came here first. At a time when, as you rightly say, they would have represented more than 5% of the population and would have arrived in a VERY short period of time. They would also have been heavily concentrated on certain places, like Liverpool.

I put it to you that is far more 'significant' than anything we are seeing now. The equivalent of 3.3m people arriving in the course of seven years in today's money. Current migration is 246k per annum net. So the inflow was roughly twice the current net inflow. And presumably the current inflow will see quite a big reversal as the EU migrants change their approach. So yes, there are lessons to learn from history.

Why are you making such a big deal about the Irish anyway? You might as well make a big deal about Welsh and Scottish 'immigration'. All part of the geographical area known as the British Isles.

Here is what most people in the country (including immigrants themselves) think about the levels of immigration:

Six out of ten people put immigration and asylum in the top three troubles facing the country, according to a Times/YouGov poll reported in January 2016.
60% of first and second generation immigrants said they feel that migration to the UK should be reduced, NatCen Social Research’s British Social Attitudes survey 2013.
75% thought the level of immigration into Britain in the last ten years had been too high, YouGov poll from February 2015.
95% of Britons believed new immigrants should speak English, a NatCen social research survey found in June 2015.
77% want to see a reduction of immigration into Britain, British Social Attitudes Survey Jan 2014.
78% support the government’s aim to reduce net migration to the tens of thousands, including 70% of those who voted Liberal Democrat in the 2010 General Election, YouGov for The Sunday Times, January 2012
68% believe that immigration has a negative effect on Britain, YouGov for The Sunday Times, January 2012
66% believe that immigration has had a negative impact on the availability of jobs, Ipsos Mori for British Future, January 2012.
88% believe that immigrants who are unable to speak English or unwilling to integrate have created ‘discomfort and disjointedness’ in British communities, YouGov for The Sunday Times, April 2011.
72% disagreed that an amnesty should be granted to illegal immigrants in Britain, YouGov for Migration Watch UK, June 2006. 12% believe that immigration had changed their local community for the better, 88% disagreed. Searchlight Educational Trust, February 2011,


Edited by hedgehog50 (07 Oct 2017 7.16pm)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Forest Hillbilly's Profile Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 07 Oct 17 7.45pm Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

I keep thinking this is the Wayne Hennessey thread ,. . .

 


"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 07 Oct 17 8.47pm

Originally posted by Willo

One has to register to attend 'Conference' providing personal details and the application needs to be approved by the party and the local Police authority which for Manchester was the Greater Manchester Police.

thanks, does make you wonder how they didnt pick up on this comedians name in that case, as he has form, even got trump, thats if he gave his right name, and if he didnt and got in then thats even more worrying.

Edited by Willo (07 Oct 2017 6.41pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 53 of 60 < 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tory conference