This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
nhs
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Previous Topic | Next Topic
legaleagle 16 Aug 15 4.12pm |
|
Thank you.You have demonstrated the extent of your bias much better than I could have.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 15 4.16pm |
|
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 16 Aug 15 4.21pm |
 |
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 16 Aug 15 4.24pm |
 |
Quote legaleagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.12pm
Thank you.You have demonstrated the extent of your bias much better than I could have.
You demonstrate everytime you print something how biased you are, which means anything you type has absolutely no credence with me what so ever 
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 15 4.37pm |
|
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
The article itself said it contained assumptions. If that's good evidence then I'm Mary Hopkins.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 16 Aug 15 4.42pm |
 |
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.37pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
The article itself said it contained assumptions. If that's good evidence then I'm Mary Hopkins.
Hi Mary!!!!
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
legaleagle 16 Aug 15 5.12pm |
|
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
You carry on.Rely on that and that even bother to read the link from the Guardian debunking it:0
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
I appreciate its "good enough for you". Don't dispute that. For anyone actually interested in rational analysis,your "evidence" is rationally debunked in the link from the Guardian posted yesterday.
ps. I went today and I thought Arsenal were the better side,though we gave a good account of ourselves and were lucky not to draw; comes from having a more open mind that you,perhaps?
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 16 Aug 15 5.21pm |
 |
Quote legaleagle at 16 Aug 2015 5.12pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
You carry on.Rely on that and that even bother to read the link from the Guardian debunking it:0
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
I appreciate its "good enough for you". Don't dispute that. For anyone actually interested in rational analysis,your "evidence" is rationally debunked in the link from the Guardian posted yesterday.
ps. I went today and I thought Arsenal were the better side,though we gave a good account of ourselves and were lucky not to draw; comes from having a more open mind that you,perhaps?
My mind is open enough thanks, it's just closed to leftist propaganda. I went today and thought Arsenal scabbed it. I genuinely believe we should have won today, and if Coquelin had been sent off as he should we probably would have. Of course I am bouyed by the display as Arsenal are a top 4 side and I believe we matched them in most departments. You really should stop judging people on their political beliefs Nick, I have nothing personal against you but you make your arguments very personal, like it's an idealogical struggle. You should be thankful we live in a country where we can air our views without fear of reprisal, or are you against that? Immigration is a real problem and if you can't just acknowledge that then I think it is you who is the one in denial.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
leggedstruggle Croydon 16 Aug 15 5.30pm |
|
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
The assumption is that the £2 billion cost figure is in fact too low as many in the NHS can't be bothered to even check whether their patients are eligible for free treatment. Do you think it is good for the NHS and the taxpayer to fund health tourism?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 16 Aug 15 5.34pm |
 |
Quote leggedstruggle at 16 Aug 2015 5.30pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
The assumption is that the £2 billion cost figure is in fact too low as many in the NHS can't be bothered to even check whether their patients are eligible for free treatment. Do you think it is good for the NHS and the taxpayer to fund health tourism?
Exactly! But because it's the Daily Mail they won't give it any credibility, which is just ridiculous. They are so blinded by leftist ideology that they won't accept it.
Edited by fed up eagle (16 Aug 2015 5.34pm)
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Aug 15 5.41pm |
|
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 5.21pm
Quote legaleagle at 16 Aug 2015 5.12pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
You carry on.Rely on that and that even bother to read the link from the Guardian debunking it:0
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
I appreciate its "good enough for you". Don't dispute that. For anyone actually interested in rational analysis,your "evidence" is rationally debunked in the link from the Guardian posted yesterday.
ps. I went today and I thought Arsenal were the better side,though we gave a good account of ourselves and were lucky not to draw; comes from having a more open mind that you,perhaps?
My mind is open enough thanks, it's just closed to leftist propaganda. I went today and thought Arsenal scabbed it. I genuinely believe we should have won today, and if Coquelin had been sent off as he should we probably would have. Of course I am bouyed by the display as Arsenal are a top 4 side and I believe we matched them in most departments. You really should stop judging people on their political beliefs Nick, I have nothing personal against you but you make your arguments very personal, like it's an idealogical struggle. You should be thankful we live in a country where we can air our views without fear of reprisal, or are you against that? Immigration is a real problem and if you can't just acknowledge that then I think it is you who is the one in denial.
Nick. You're responding to the wrong person.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 16 Aug 15 6.03pm |
 |
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 5.41pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 5.21pm
Quote legaleagle at 16 Aug 2015 5.12pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Aug 2015 4.16pm
Quote fed up eagle at 16 Aug 2015 4.10pm
ww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2470994/TRUE-cost-health-tourism-Foreigners-cost-NHS-2BN-year.html
Have it!!!!!!
From the article, which dates back to 2013...
You carry on.Rely on that and that even bother to read the link from the Guardian debunking it:0
The Government admits that today’s twin reports on the scale of the problem are, by definition, based on incomplete information and a series of assumptions and must be treated with some caution.
So not conclusive then. You need to provide better evidence than that I'm afraid.
You mean like how you need to print better evidence? It's good enough for me thanks. I suppose you think Arsenal deserved to beat us today to don't you? A complete contrarian you are. 
I appreciate its "good enough for you". Don't dispute that. For anyone actually interested in rational analysis,your "evidence" is rationally debunked in the link from the Guardian posted yesterday.
ps. I went today and I thought Arsenal were the better side,though we gave a good account of ourselves and were lucky not to draw; comes from having a more open mind that you,perhaps?
My mind is open enough thanks, it's just closed to leftist propaganda. I went today and thought Arsenal scabbed it. I genuinely believe we should have won today, and if Coquelin had been sent off as he should we probably would have. Of course I am bouyed by the display as Arsenal are a top 4 side and I believe we matched them in most departments. You really should stop judging people on their political beliefs Nick, I have nothing personal against you but you make your arguments very personal, like it's an idealogical struggle. You should be thankful we live in a country where we can air our views without fear of reprisal, or are you against that? Immigration is a real problem and if you can't just acknowledge that then I think it is you who is the one in denial.
Nick. You're responding to the wrong person.
Yeah, you two are so the same it's unreal 
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Previous Topic | Next Topic