This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by martin2412
You wouldn't call me a tit to my face so don't do it on a keyboard sweetheart. As for Abbott being re-elected, thats not hard. The population of Hackney would vote in a chimp if it was wearing a red rosette. Very intelligent. If you had said that in my presence I certainly would call you a silly tit.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
legaleagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
I'm less than impressed by Diane Abbott as a front bencher. I don't doubt she is a good constituency MP,But,imagine if a class A buffoon like Boris Johnson was subject to the same level and type of of critique as her every day... Why isn't he but she is? Now,that's an interesting question Edited by legaleagle (13 Jun 2017 10.58pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Abbott on form. Article about her illness and the campaign.
Another article about this topic written just before the election
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
I'm less than impressed by Diane Abbott as a front bencher. I don't doubt she is a good constituency MP,But,imagine if a class A buffoon like Boris Johnson was subject to the same level and type of of critique as her every day... Why isn't he but she is? Now,that's an interesting question Edited by legaleagle (13 Jun 2017 10.58pm) Totally agree.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
I'm less than impressed by Diane Abbott as a front bencher. I don't doubt she is a good constituency MP,But,imagine if a class A buffoon like Boris Johnson was subject to the same level and type of of critique as her every day... Why isn't he but she is? Now,that's an interesting question Edited by legaleagle (13 Jun 2017 10.58pm) Johnson has had his fair share of media coverage of his more head-scratching escapades. When he got stuck on the high wire springs to mind. Ultimately, though, perhaps he just comes across as a more likeable kind of fella.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Kermit must be an exception then.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Totally agree. Ah the 'progressives/regressives' and their 'discrimination Olympics'. Personally I've always considered the criticism of 'insert person I don't like' for mis-steps in interviews as overblown and diversionary. If politics were about electing the very best minds then it wouldn't be a popularity contest but an IQ test with expert judges. Of course ability is important but choosing your advisors wisely is more important than knowing the price of milk or whatever stat the media wants to throw at you. It's a circus and little else. That said people are perfectly entitled to dislike Abbot without the rather pointless inferred comeback 'is it because I'm black'? Sasha Cohen was taking the p1ss out of that argument over a decade ago..... but we can always expect 'progressives' to like their 'goto' political clichés. The point could easily be argued that the only reason Abbott has traveled so far in the Labour party is less to do with her ability and much more to do with her race....Which is racism to whichever person, of a different race, she blocked if they had better ability...Pick your angle but it's all the same diversionary argument. Second guessing intent is pointless, better to deal with the actual points. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2017 1.10am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
He's also for Scottish independence.....Except when he isn't for Scottish independence.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Problem is that the Marxists of Labour are using the Labour brand not the communist one. The BNP aren't hiding in plain sight at the helm of the Conservative party. They gain far more votes via tribalism than they ever would otherwise. There's an inherent dishonesty.
There have always been Marxists in the labour party and its origins lie within Marxism and trade unionism. I don't see anything wrong with that. Quite a few senior members of Labor over the years have been ex communist party members.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
hedgehog50 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
There have always been Marxists in the labour party and its origins lie within Marxism and trade unionism. I don't see anything wrong with that. Quite a few senior members of Labor over the years have been ex communist party members. Perhaps they should publicise their communist links more then - no doubt many people would rally to the red flag. However, if they think Marxist policies will work here despite failing everywhere else they have been tried, they might be in for a disappointment. Meanwhile the 'intelligent' left will be telling them not to lose faith, just needs a bit of fine tuning, just need to get rid of all the unintelligent enemies of the people who are sabotaging the glorious plans as set out in the holy scriptures of the great prophet Karl Marx (blessings on his gulags).
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Ah the 'progressives/regressives' and their 'discrimination Olympics'. Personally I've always considered the criticism of 'insert person I don't like' for mis-steps in interviews as overblown and diversionary. If politics were about electing the very best minds then it wouldn't be a popularity contest but an IQ test with expert judges. Of course ability is important but choosing your advisors wisely is more important than knowing the price of milk or whatever stat the media wants to throw at you. It's a circus and little else. That said people are perfectly entitled to dislike Abbot without the rather pointless inferred comeback 'is it because I'm black'? Sasha Cohen was taking the p1ss out of that argument over a decade ago..... but we can always expect 'progressives' to like their 'goto' political clichés. The point could easily be argued that the only reason Abbott has traveled so far in the Labour party is less to do with her ability and much more to do with her race....Which is racism to whichever person, of a different race, she blocked if they had better ability...Pick your angle but it's all the same diversionary argument. Second guessing intent is pointless, better to deal with the actual points. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2017 1.10am) Haha, scenes. A lot of time for you completely missing the joke of an entire character.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
A chimp would probably play better in terms of PR. Look a Bush jr and Trump. People now fondly remember the shaved chimp in a suit.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.