The Right-Wing are less intelligent...

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Jun 17 5.38pm
Originally posted by martin2412 All I have to say to prove that article and study is a load of cobblers is...... DIANE ABBOTT Of course using colloquialisms and 'caps talk' in an argument about intellectual capacity, isn't a good sign. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 13 Jun 17 5.38pm

Originally posted by martin2412

All I have to say to prove that article and study is a load of cobblers is......

DIANE ABBOTT

Of course using colloquialisms and 'caps talk' in an argument about intellectual capacity, isn't a good sign.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Jun 17 5.39pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays For some people I think it's April fools everyday. Some people I wonder how they manage to get through dinner without suffocating. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 13 Jun 17 5.39pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

For some people I think it's April fools everyday.

Some people I wonder how they manage to get through dinner without suffocating.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 17 5.43pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 No, I would say that UKIP voters took a very reasonable view that uncontrollable immigration was detrimental, and that staying attached to a failing political experiment called the EU was likewise. Whereas, because of their 'intelligent' beliefs, the left think otherwise. All of them? Can I say that all of them saw them as an acceptable place for ex NF types as well.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 17 5.43pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

No, I would say that UKIP voters took a very reasonable view that uncontrollable immigration was detrimental, and that staying attached to a failing political experiment called the EU was likewise. Whereas, because of their 'intelligent' beliefs, the left think otherwise.

All of them?
Can I say that all of them saw them as an acceptable place for ex NF types as well.

Alert a moderator to this post

thegreatlardino crawley/selsey 13 Jun 17 5.45pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Some people I wonder how they manage to get through dinner without suffocating. like that one might have to use it at work! They're justified, and they're ancient And they drive an ice cream van
Alert a moderator to this post

thegreatlardino

crawley/selsey 13 Jun 17 5.45pm

Send a Private Message to thegreatlardino

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Some people I wonder how they manage to get through dinner without suffocating.

like that one might have to use it at work!

They're justified, and they're ancient
And they drive an ice cream van

Alert a moderator to this post

CambridgeEagle Sydenham 13 Jun 17 5.47pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays So supporting the only party that was willing to fight for immigration controls for Europeans means you are 'vehemently against foreigners'. Honestly it's such a joke. So being left of centre means: "For the left, their politics is more like a religion, more of a blind faith, a belief in a golden future - like religious peoples' heaven." Rather simply than observing that inequality is inefficient and poverty a waste and that cuts to public spending and services in an economic downturn is both economically and morally questionable?
Alert a moderator to this post

CambridgeEagle

Sydenham 13 Jun 17 5.47pm

Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

So supporting the only party that was willing to fight for immigration controls for Europeans means you are 'vehemently against foreigners'.

Honestly it's such a joke.

So being left of centre means:

"For the left, their politics is more like a religion, more of a blind faith, a belief in a golden future - like religious peoples' heaven."

Rather simply than observing that inequality is inefficient and poverty a waste and that cuts to public spending and services in an economic downturn is both economically and morally questionable?

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Jun 17 5.52pm
Originally posted by nickgusset All of them? Can I say that all of them saw them as an acceptable place for ex NF types as well. Like the Labour Party head of campaign being an acceptable place for ex communist party types? Edited by hedgehog50 (13 Jun 2017 5.52pm) We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 13 Jun 17 5.52pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

All of them?
Can I say that all of them saw them as an acceptable place for ex NF types as well.

Like the Labour Party head of campaign being an acceptable place for ex communist party types?

Edited by hedgehog50 (13 Jun 2017 5.52pm)

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Jun 17 5.54pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 No, I would say that UKIP voters took a very reasonable view that uncontrollable immigration was detrimental, and that staying attached to a failing political experiment called the EU was likewise. Whereas, because of their 'intelligent' beliefs, the left think otherwise This is why people think the right wing are less intelligent, the constant projecting of their own perception over reality. Around 30% of those voting for an exit were from a left wing background. They also tended to ignore the Labour MPs who backed Exit and the Trade Union movements against the EU. Its the whole right good, left bad mentality that lets the right down (and the same is true of the left). Edited by jamiemartin721 (13 Jun 2017 5.55pm) "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 13 Jun 17 5.54pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

No, I would say that UKIP voters took a very reasonable view that uncontrollable immigration was detrimental, and that staying attached to a failing political experiment called the EU was likewise. Whereas, because of their 'intelligent' beliefs, the left think otherwise

This is why people think the right wing are less intelligent, the constant projecting of their own perception over reality.

Around 30% of those voting for an exit were from a left wing background. They also tended to ignore the Labour MPs who backed Exit and the Trade Union movements against the EU.

Its the whole right good, left bad mentality that lets the right down (and the same is true of the left).

Edited by jamiemartin721 (13 Jun 2017 5.55pm)

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

npn Crowborough 13 Jun 17 5.55pm
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle The article stipulates that there are (obviously) exceptions to the rule. So you've proven nothing other than that you're a bit of a tit and not very funny. In a short defence of Abbott, if you actually knew anything about her you'd know that your statement is nothing other than mud slinging based on mistakes in a couple of interviews. If you actually knew anything about her background and record over the last 30+ years you'd think differently. Her constituents clearly see the work that she's done and rewarded her again this year with huge numbers of votes and huge majority. The attacks on Abbott on here and in the wider press have been nothing short of shameful. She's held to a much higher standard than other politicians simply because she's black and a woman. Theresa May had a far worse campaign and even lied about making u-turns, and while she has subsequently come under attack for her failures she's not been subject to the level of abuse that Abbott has. The reaction and scepticism surrounding her illness is another example of people, especially in the press, giving Abbott a much harder time than other politicians. I actually read your opinions with interest normally, but that is a pathetic attempt to make Abbott un-criticisable for the precise reasons you claim she is criticiseed. Certain people in politics are inherently unlikable, examples are plentiful: Thatcher, Gove, Abbott, Sturgeon. They will get more roundly criticised for that reason, not because they are black, or Scottish, or female, or anything else. To say people only criticise Abbott because she's black and a woman is a woeful argument. Mostly they criticise her because she's bloody awful and, for a person of obviously high intellect, she does a fantastic impression of a f*cking idiot!
Alert a moderator to this post

npn

Crowborough 13 Jun 17 5.55pm

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

The article stipulates that there are (obviously) exceptions to the rule. So you've proven nothing other than that you're a bit of a tit and not very funny.

In a short defence of Abbott, if you actually knew anything about her you'd know that your statement is nothing other than mud slinging based on mistakes in a couple of interviews. If you actually knew anything about her background and record over the last 30+ years you'd think differently. Her constituents clearly see the work that she's done and rewarded her again this year with huge numbers of votes and huge majority.

The attacks on Abbott on here and in the wider press have been nothing short of shameful. She's held to a much higher standard than other politicians simply because she's black and a woman. Theresa May had a far worse campaign and even lied about making u-turns, and while she has subsequently come under attack for her failures she's not been subject to the level of abuse that Abbott has. The reaction and scepticism surrounding her illness is another example of people, especially in the press, giving Abbott a much harder time than other politicians.

I actually read your opinions with interest normally, but that is a pathetic attempt to make Abbott un-criticisable for the precise reasons you claim she is criticiseed.

Certain people in politics are inherently unlikable, examples are plentiful: Thatcher, Gove, Abbott, Sturgeon. They will get more roundly criticised for that reason, not because they are black, or Scottish, or female, or anything else. To say people only criticise Abbott because she's black and a woman is a woeful argument. Mostly they criticise her because she's bloody awful and, for a person of obviously high intellect, she does a fantastic impression of a f*cking idiot!

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Jun 17 5.55pm
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle So being left of centre means: "For the left, their politics is more like a religion, more of a blind faith, a belief in a golden future - like religious peoples' heaven." Rather simply than observing that inequality is inefficient and poverty a waste and that cuts to public spending and services in an economic downturn is both economically and morally questionable? More them ignoring facts in front of their noses because they contradict their dogmas and believing that simply taking money from those that have it and giving it to those who do not solves everything. We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 13 Jun 17 5.55pm

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

So being left of centre means:

"For the left, their politics is more like a religion, more of a blind faith, a belief in a golden future - like religious peoples' heaven."

Rather simply than observing that inequality is inefficient and poverty a waste and that cuts to public spending and services in an economic downturn is both economically and morally questionable?

More them ignoring facts in front of their noses because they contradict their dogmas and believing that simply taking money from those that have it and giving it to those who do not solves everything.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Jun 17 5.59pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 Like the Labour Party head of campaign being an acceptable place for ex communist party types? Edited by hedgehog50 (13 Jun 2017 5.52pm) Yes, and we should have no problem with even actual communists being leaders of parties or even governments if they are democratically elected. Even Communists, should be represented in Parliament. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 13 Jun 17 5.59pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Like the Labour Party head of campaign being an acceptable place for ex communist party types?

Edited by hedgehog50 (13 Jun 2017 5.52pm)

Yes, and we should have no problem with even actual communists being leaders of parties or even governments if they are democratically elected.

Even Communists, should be represented in Parliament.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

CambridgeEagle Sydenham 13 Jun 17 6.00pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 No, I would say that UKIP voters took a very reasonable view that uncontrollable immigration was detrimental, and that staying attached to a failing political experiment called the EU was likewise. Whereas, because of their 'intelligent' beliefs, the left think otherwise. The left think otherwise to UKIP? That's hardly surprising. You're pretty hypocritical here, simply as it's your view you see it in a different light. Your ridiculous caricature of the left is about as accurate as mine of UKIP.
Alert a moderator to this post

CambridgeEagle

Sydenham 13 Jun 17 6.00pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

The left think otherwise to UKIP? That's hardly surprising.

You're pretty hypocritical here, simply as it's your view you see it in a different light. Your ridiculous caricature of the left is about as accurate as mine of UKIP.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 13 Jun 17 6.02pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 It doesn't look like the article has come with a socio-economic angle, which in itself is worth a separate study if one hasn't been done already, but has focused solely on 'intelligence'. And how are you measuring that?
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

13 Jun 17 6.02pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Kermit8

It doesn't look like the article has come with a socio-economic angle, which in itself is worth a separate study if one hasn't been done already, but has focused solely on 'intelligence'.

And how are you measuring that?

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Right-Wing are less intelligent...

Site Map

Sponsors