This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by the_mcanuff_stuff
Of course they are. Binary choice. "The United Kigdom should leave the European Union". Bosh. May has fulfilled that requirement 100% in her proposal. I fail to see how still remaining subject to certain EU rules and regulations constitutes being ‘out’ but hey ho.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
But that wasn’t the question, was it? How do you distill the people wanting the Norway option from all the other leave voters? That is the crux of my argument since my first post on this thread. "Out" Was never defined. What shape it should take etc. The question was flawed from the start. Therefore people can't bitch and moan when the PM delivers a Brexit they don't personally like. Though, as I've stated before, the Norway option is the least palatable to all sides and personally the worst of-both worlds. It was in no way clear that Brexit represented to everyone, what it did to you or your friends.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
I fail to see how still remaining subject to certain EU rules and regulations constitutes being ‘out’ but hey ho. Norway are "out" are they not? And still subject to certain EU rules and regulations. Very much not an Eu member.
|
|
|
Originally posted by the_mcanuff_stuff
Of course they are. Binary choice. "The United Kigdom should leave the European Union". Bosh. May has fulfilled that requirement 100% in her proposal. But she hasn't. During the implementation phase we cannot sign trade deals and have to accept EU rules which we have no say in. I don't like this deal because it is lacking an end date. We cannot give notice and leave this deal unilaterally therefore the pressure is on us not the EU. What she should have negotiated is a hard leave date by which everything ends. That is then an incentive for both the UK and the EU to replace this with a free trade deal before that end date. Instead we have a Hotel California deal and it will not be passed by Parliament. Edited by Badger11 (15 Nov 2018 5.05pm)
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
From the OED (that’s the Oxford English Dictionary, by the way): Definitive is often used, rather imprecisely, when definite is actually intended, to mean simply ‘clearly decided’. Although definitive and definite have a clear overlap in meaning, definitive has the additional sense of ‘having an authoritative basis’. Thus, a definitive decision is one which is not only conclusive but also carries the stamp of authority or is a benchmark for the future, while a definite decision is simply one which has been made clearly and is without doubt.. The authoritative basis here is that, in a referendum, more people voted to leave than to remain. Does it get any more authoritative than that? I’ll leave you to email the OED if you disagree with their definition. Oh eff you and your ‘dictionary’, whatever that is (Your brother is a QC right? I’ve been spending time with a couple this week in my real life, not a nuisance world)
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Oh eff you and your ‘dictionary’, whatever that is (Your brother is a QC right? I’ve been spending time with a couple this week in my real life, not a nuisance world) Yeah, he is but he laid off barristering a couple of years ago. He now sits in majestic splendour as a judge, sending an endless stream of miscreants to chokey.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Yeah, he is but he laid off barristering a couple of years ago. He now sits in majestic splendour as a judge, sending an endless stream of miscreants to chokey. How does it feel to be the thick one in the family?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Yeah, he is but he laid off barristering a couple of years ago. He now sits in majestic splendour as a judge, sending an endless stream of miscreants to chokey. I would have liked to have been a judge but I never had the Latin.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
How does it feel to be the thick one in the family? You insolent little scamp
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Cucking doesn't realise his big contradiction First argues the vote was to leave the EU lock stock and barrel whatever the consequences, then ends by saying how much of a total disaster it all is Don't you think people voted remain because of EXACTLY this situation we now find ourselves in? I think you trained at the Steeleye School of Rational Debate.
|
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
We have probably got another 10 years of this s***e. The 'end-game' means the 'start-game'. I am sure I won't be around if it ever does end, and what a pointless disaster it all is. It is Suez all over again, the same duplicity and self-delusion. So many serious problems in the country all put on the sidelines while they tear themselves to pieces. The deal is far more than the UK deserves. Added to the last 10 being stolen from us.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
I think you trained at the Steeleye School of Rational Debate. My debating skills are, of course, legendary. -.-'
|
|
|
Leaving Europe is not the problem. Europe need a deal as much as us. A stand now will see them compromise.
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
But she hasn't. During the implementation phase we cannot sign trade deals and have to accept EU rules which we have no say in. I don't like this deal because it is lacking an end date. We cannot give notice and leave this deal unilaterally therefore the pressure is on us not the EU. What she should have negotiated is a hard leave date by which everything ends. That is then an incentive for both the UK and the EU to replace this with a free trade deal before that end date. Instead we have a Hotel California deal and it will not be passed by Parliament. Edited by Badger11 (15 Nov 2018 5.05pm) You brexiters need to make your minds up Cucking says Full hard brexit whatever the consequences, you're saying the detail is important No form is brexit can you have your cake and eat it
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
You brexiters need to make your minds up Cucking says Full hard brexit whatever the consequences, you're saying the detail is important No form is brexit can you have your cake and eat it No I didn't say that. In my previous posts I have said I would prefer a hard Brexit and then we negotiate. On this deal I said today that it was the lack of the end date that worries me. There is plenty I don't like in this deal but if Mrs May said suck it up for 1 year (example) and then we're done I would go alone with that as the path of least resistance. As for what other posters think surely that is up to them as the Remainers keep telling us we all voted for different things.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Leaving Europe is not the problem. Europe need a deal as much as us. A stand now will see them compromise.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.