Slovakian PM
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 20 May 24 7.59pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
For example? I want to know exactly the sort of proof you would expect. I have already answered that. Until it actually emerged its precise detail won’t be known and asking for it is simply a diversionary tactic. It needs to be hard, verifiable evidence of either a cover-up or an alternative explanation for what happened.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Teddy Eagle  20 May 24 8.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Prosecutions which result in convictions have nothing to do with any media company or government department. They depend on judges and juries assessing evidence. Whether the source is precisely the same is unimportant. What this proves is that the warnings being sounded by our security services are grounded in fact, not fiction. And how does that prove conspiracy theories come from the same source?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 20 May 24 9.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have already answered that. Until it actually emerged its precise detail won’t be known and asking for it is simply a diversionary tactic. It needs to be hard, verifiable evidence of either a cover-up or an alternative explanation for what happened. You are avoiding a simple question. What evidence would you need to find? Give me a couple of examples. I can't make it easier for you. If you are so sure that no such evidence exists then tell us all what is missing?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 May 24 10.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You are avoiding a simple question. What evidence would you need to find? Give me a couple of examples. I can't make it easier for you. If you are so sure that no such evidence exists then tell us all what is missing? To try to assist you I did in my last response. Maybe you missed “verifiable evidence of a cover-up or an alternative explanation for what happened”? It really cannot be any easier!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 May 24 10.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
And how does that prove conspiracy theories come from the same source? All of them? That’s obviously untrue. What it proves is that what the security services have reported is factually true. Which is that the enemies of the Western democracies are using the internet to spread misinformation designed to undermine our trust in our system and our governments. Whether you don’t accept that activity as spreading conspiracy theories is up to you. I do, and so, it seems, do our security services.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 20 May 24 10.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
All of them? That’s obviously untrue. What it proves is that what the security services have reported is factually true. Which is that the enemies of the Western democracies are using the internet to spread misinformation designed to undermine our trust in our system and our governments. Whether you don’t accept that activity as spreading conspiracy theories is up to you. I do, and so, it seems, do our security services. OK, I don't accept it then.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 21 May 24 10.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
To try to assist you I did in my last response. Maybe you missed “verifiable evidence of a cover-up or an alternative explanation for what happened”? It really cannot be any easier! No, I don't want a generalisations, I want SPECIFIC EXAMPLES of the kind of evidence you would consider to be proof. Come on Wisbech. This isn't too hard for is it?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 22 May 24 9.21am |
|
|---|---|
|
Still waiting...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 23 May 24 8.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
So the man who calls everything a conspiracy theory can't give me one single example of the kind of evidence that he would accept as proof that Kennedy was not killed by a lone gunman. Just one single example. It's almost like there is no substance to anything he posts.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 May 24 8.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
OK, I don't accept it then. Obviously you are entitled to your opinion. As are our security services. Whose do I trust? No prizes for a correct guess.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 May 24 9.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So the man who calls everything a conspiracy theory can't give me one single example of the kind of evidence that he would accept as proof that Kennedy was not killed by a lone gunman. Just one single example. It's almost like there is no substance to anything he posts. I was both busy and sick yesterday so had other things to do. I think the request is daft. You can only give a general description until an actual event is known. It’s like demanding a yes or no answer to a question where maybe is the only accurate one. It could be almost anything. A document, video, corroborating statements from several people with no connections to each other, or motivations to lie. You’ll only know when it is clear and obvious.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 23 May 24 9.18am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I was both busy and sick yesterday so had other things to do. I think the request is daft. You can only give a general description until an actual event is known. It’s like demanding a yes or no answer to a question where maybe is the only accurate one. It could be almost anything. A document, video, corroborating statements from several people with no connections to each other, or motivations to lie. You’ll only know when it is clear and obvious. We have those things. The famous film of the shooting makes it clear that he was shot from two positions. Only a good deal of brainwashing has made people see something else. There is so much more. Any evidence or testamony that contradicted the official line was ignored or misinterpreted by the Warren Commission. The American government will never confirm the validity of any evidence because it would be highly damaging. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (23 May 2024 9.20am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.