According to the BBC, the marxist BLM org contacted them saying that they, blm, want the 'A' in bame removed, its just to be known bme. The left-wing bbc have agreed & will promote this.

This was on the left-wing bbcnews/victoria thingy prog last week

According to the BBC, the marxist BLM org contacted them saying that they, blm, want the 'A' in bame removed, its just to be known bme. The left-wing bbc have agreed & will promote this.

This was on the left-wing bbcnews/victoria thingy prog last week

When my wife was on holiday in Sri Lanka a few years ago (she is fair-skinned, naturally blonde) whilst on a packed bus the local women were fascinated by her, stroking her hair and touching her skin. This is how curiosity of 'the other' often manifests itself all over the world, but not normally in the Western countries.

[Link]

Now commentators are racist

If you like a good acronym, join the nhs, that place eats drinks and sleeps acronyms. I once sat at a meeting where the only meaningful words were Hi my name is, yes, no, and, the, thanks for listening. Wouldn’t be so bad if it wasn’t 15 mins long. I came out and rather sheepishly asked one of the management team what he was talking about and he said, “I’m not 100% sure”. Didn’t feel quite so bad then.

"lighter skin tone were praised more often for their intelligence and work ethic."

Is there any evidence to say the commentators are wrong?

and darker skin tone was mentioned as being associated more with power and speed.

Hmm, did this survey also take into account what position on the pitch these players were? Comparing a Jedinak type player in midfield who was an intelligent defender (commentators speak for being in the right place at the right time) would not be the same as describing a Chris Armstrong type who was all about speed (commentators speak for he is fekking quick) and to keep this line of argument totally unbiased from a colour perspective, how about trying to compare Patrick Viera with Ian Wright using their point of view?

They also missed the point that in the professional game a player is often described as intelligent (or quick) to make up for the shortcomings in the rest of his game. Sakho for example is described as an intelligent defender who reads the game well. This is a polite way of saying he is quite slow and has to read the game well otherwise he wouldn't be playing at this level. The same argument can be levelled at countless numbers of white centre halfs.

In short the whole thing is a nonsense. You can make statistics prove anything if you really want to. All they are doing is trying to criticise every single facet of our day to day life and turn us into a guilt ridden society. But to what end is the question?

At my work meetings we also suffered from a POA (plethora of acronyms) that so it was fun to MUA (make up acronyms) or conclude it was a LOOB (Load Of Old Bollox).
The best part was these neologisms were never challenged since colleagues couldn’t admit not knowing what they meant. It was the same with imaginary precedents.
It’s tempting to think everyone else was doing this too but they were a bit too serious.
It was FITT (filled in the time) anyway.