This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Be very surprised if we approach a German or he (or she) accepts.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
As much as it is much more exciting to watch, it's just impossible to play that openly and beat the top sides. Great to watch but will never win anyone a tournament.
As has been ably demonstrated in this thread and in the football records, we don't beat the top sides anyway. So why not 'give it a go' and at least give the fans something to be excited about as we (if you are right) fail yet again, rather than failing with the usual turgidity?
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Originally posted by YT
As has been ably demonstrated in this thread and in the football records, we don't beat the top sides anyway. So why not 'give it a go' and at least give the fans something to be excited about as we (if you are right) fail yet again, rather than failing with the usual turgidity? I think fans finding getting to finals and semi-finals exciting.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
I think fans finding getting to finals and semi-finals exciting. That's fine, then, if they are happy with failure. One final, by the way. Singular.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Originally posted by YT
That's fine, then, if they are happy with failure. One final, by the way. Singular. And only in international tournament is everything bar winning a trophy considered failure. Palace's entire existence has been a failure. We were all just being happy with failure under Glasner. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (19 Jun 2024 4.47pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
And only in international tournament is everything bar winning a trophy considered failure. Palace's entire existence has been a failure. We were all just being happy with failure under Glasner. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (19 Jun 2024 4.47pm) OK I admit to a wrong choice of word. It should have been under-achievement relative to what ought to be attainable given the quality players available. I'm not going to rehearse this thread and the England Manager thread all over again, but player statistics show that England has a high proportion of the best players in Europe, but they play a style of football that fails to make use of that quality. Your comparison to CPFC is curious. We have perhaps a handful of decent players but they are far from the best in the league. Under one manager the team was cautious and some would say turgid and not particularly successful; under another manager it's exciting and successful. I know which I'd rather watch.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Have we won yet?
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Be very surprised if we approach a German or he (or she) accepts. Or, indeed, an Austrian? We've had an Italian and a Swede so why not? I suspect our structure has changed since the FA sat in that room about 14 years ago and planned for winning the 2022 WC. And we were only a missed penalty away. It is a large behemoth where everything is precisely planned and choreographed and where the "head coach" is little more than a presentable mouth piece. Howe maybe, but I would be surprised if Glasner would take a role where his influence is largely cosmetic and peripheral.
|
|
|
Originally posted by MFW94
Bit miffed at the expectation you should play attacking free flowing football at international tournaments - bar probably brazil in 1970 what side has ever actually done that? Brazil in 1982 played samba style football and didnt win anything, the great total dutch football of the 70s didnt win a world cup either. Brazil in 2002 went in to the world cup on the back of 5 losses and ronaldo was unfit, and again played 2 holding midfielders with a back 5. they of course ended up winning the thing by beating Turkey X2, Costa Rica, China, Belgium, England and Germany - hardly played any of the big boys did they until the final. And for the most part, when have England never played 'good' football - even euro 96 we played 3-5-2 and won a game on pens after a 0-0 draw. This. It's tournament football. A 630 minute match with changes of opponent. You play every team like a final and you will be spent by the first knock-out game. I predict a 0-0 draw today... and Southgate's face appearing as a turnip.
|
|
|
Originally posted by MFW94
Bit miffed at the expectation you should play attacking free flowing football at international tournaments - bar probably brazil in 1970 what side has ever actually done that? Brazil in 1982 played samba style football and didnt win anything, the great total dutch football of the 70s didnt win a world cup either. Brazil in 2002 went in to the world cup on the back of 5 losses and ronaldo was unfit, and again played 2 holding midfielders with a back 5. they of course ended up winning the thing by beating Turkey X2, Costa Rica, China, Belgium, England and Germany - hardly played any of the big boys did they until the final. And for the most part, when have England never played 'good' football - even euro 96 we played 3-5-2 and, won a game on pens after a 0-0 draw. That was a great Brazilian team, probably my favourite team of any World Cup. But it just goes to show the best and/or the most exciting team to watch doesn’t always(if ever)win a tournament. They were beaten by an Italian side that just about scraped through the first group stage with three draws and who then went on to win the tournament
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
England unchanged which I guess isn't overly surprising - Foden and Trent need to make an impact today. Expecting another cagey game - main incentive for us is not to lose, and Southgate doesn't need a 2nd invitation to play safe. Predict a scrappy 1-1 and a load more hysteria It has draw written all over it but let's hope it's a bit more fluent and attacking today.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
I’m starting to think it’s laziness and arrogance with this England team, they think they can casually strut through a game.
|
|
|
Is it possible to sack your coach mid tournament? Utterly clueless, Hodgson 2.0.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Foxy82
Is it possible to sack your coach mid tournament? Utterly clueless, Hodgson 2.0. EverBodyDannsNow will no doubt differ and say we are doing well, but I agree with the TV experts, except they aren't allow to actually say that Southgate's coaching is sh!te.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Originally posted by monkey
I’m starting to think it’s laziness and arrogance with this England team, they think they can casually strut through a game. I really don't think it is - this is a group of players who between them have won everything at club level. Mentally they're as good as it gets. The tactics are a mess and if anyone should be able to recognise it, it's Palace fans because it's exactly how Hodgson set us up. It's too deep. There's no willingness to press the opposition in their half, and with Kane sitting in midfield there's no out ball so we're camped in our half with nowhere to go. Pray the ball drops to Bellingham (Eze) or Foden (Olise) and they do something out of nothing in a system that isn't suited to getting them into good positions. Note: I've never been a Southgate out.
26th January 2010 - Enter Administration |
|
|
Originally posted by Foxy82
Is it possible to sack your coach mid tournament? Utterly clueless, Hodgson 2.0. I'd be up for that
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.