This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by DanH
You have such angry warped logic.
As you know....some of my harshest criticism.....and I accept I'm harsh....is for champagne socialism.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You have just admitted to money burning a hole in your pocket that you don't need. Now you give me this! Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 3.30pm) What point are you making here? You can’t have a good job and believe society is unfair/unbalanced at the same time? I don’t get it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by W12
"that whole bracket of people earning around £80-100k a year aren’t going to up and run for the sake of a couple hundred quid a year" Yeah, f*** the people who are working their arses off and already pay £40% tax. Let them pay for more immigrants while watching their country go to s***. Oh bore off. You're way over the comfort threshold – save money by using the NHS and the state system. Choices you make. Or, as previously stated, go and live in an even more corrupt country where you can skim as much off the top as you (don't) need.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
No, realism and I am not a fanatic. Please by all means put the case of Labour and lets open up the debate in a constructive manner. But you are most definitely partisan. That was a request – I too would like to see a Tory fanatic vs Labour/Momentum fanatic forum off. Willo vs. ?
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
What point are you making here? You can’t have a good job and believe society is unfair/unbalanced at the same time? I don’t get it. That's not what I said. I was referring to money and consistency.....Yeah, sure they sometimes point at actual unfairness, while directly contributing to it. Look, it's similar to the tax man who wants to join Jesus.....it's essentially the 'cake and eat it' brigade....The 'I can be rich, but I'm one of you or with you'. 'Don't be fooled by the rocks that I got. What a complete load of self deluded BS. A well off socialist is a hypocrite......give the extra away or admit that your support for that politics is a form of self aggrandisement.....a self image of yourself as moral while you make excuses for driving two cars and nice holidays while supporting 'equality'.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
What point are you making here? You can’t have a good job and believe society is unfair/unbalanced at the same time? I don’t get it. Yeah this needs explaining TBF I've never understood this standpoint Although in the context of religion it makes sense to me (i.e. follow your principles to the letter – follow religion as it was conceived – catholicism is most definately cheating, confession only started in the 11th century for crying out loud – but that's for another thread) Edited by SW19 CPFC (05 Dec 2019 4.40pm)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Yeah this needs explaining TBF I've never understood this standpoint Although in the context of religion it makes sense to me (i.e. follow your principles to the letter – follow religion as it was conceived – catholicism is most definately cheating, confession only started in the 11th century for crying out loud – but that's for another thread) Edited by SW19 CPFC (05 Dec 2019 4.40pm) Catholicism is nearer to the book though from implications of what Jesus is meant to have said to Peter.......though the resulting church is a parody of the New Testament. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 4.45pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That's not what I said. I was referring to money and consistency.....Yeah, sure they sometimes point at actual unfairness, while directly contributing to it. Look, it's similar to the tax man who wants to join Jesus.....it's essentially the 'cake and eat it' brigade....The 'I can be rich, but I'm one of you'. Don't be fooled by the rocks that I got. What a complete load of BS. A well off socialist is a hypocrite......give the extra away or admit that your support for that politics is a form of self aggrandisement.....a deluded self image of yourself as moral while you make excuses for driving two cars and nice holidays. Haha to the JLO ref Doesn't your point of view only apply if said person says they are a die hard, puritanical socialist? What happens if they're socially and morally level headed, redistribute a significant portion of their wealth to benefit others, are sympathetic to 'socialism lite', lets say, yet still hold some back to enjoy life, but not in an ostentatious way? Aren't you being a bit binary here?
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Catholicism is nearer to the book though from implications of what Jesus is meant to have said to Peter.......though the resulting church is a parody of the New Testament. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 4.45pm) Perhaps, but it's way after the fact. The only religious individuals I have any respect for are monks, or those who dedicate their entire lives to whatever their religion is, in its purest sense. They're misguided, but at least they're committed. To come full circle, I have zero time for champagne religion. If you're going to waste your life, do it properly.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Haha to the JLO ref Doesn't your point of view only apply if said person says they are a die hard, puritanical socialist? What happens if they're socially and morally level headed, redistribute a significant portion of their wealth to benefit others, are sympathetic to 'socialism lite', lets say, yet still hold some back to enjoy life, but not in an ostentatious way? Aren't you being a bit binary here? Well, there are degrees of hypocrisy aren't there...Like I say, it's the tax man to Jesus analogy. We are all hypocrites to smaller or larger extents, I'm not saying...for example, that Dan is a bad person...because he obviously has a conscience, I'm just saying that his comments perhaps betray a man of convenience.....for where it suits him, which is what money give you. He's hardly on his own there. Still, when it comes to money and politics the overt optics of being left and well off are stark. Anyone with extra money they think the government should be taking in taxes should already be giving it away....it's hardly as though that arrangement is hard to make.....But of course, it's so much easier to virtue signal it. I think accusing me of being a little binary is a fair accusation.....But what can I say, I like my socialists to live their principles and that just means I'm critical of champagne socialism.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
You’ve already admitted you don’t read manifestos and vote Tory every election regardless - how are you able to make predictions about how bad it will be under Labour? What Labour tax policies are you referring to above? When my dad was on strike alongside the 3 day week in the 70s
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well, there are degrees of hypocrisy aren't there...Like I say, it's the tax man to Jesus analogy. We are all hypocrites to smaller or larger extents, I'm not saying...for example, that Dan is a bad person...because he obviously has a conscience, I'm just saying that his comments perhaps betray a man of convenience.....for where it suits him, which is what money give you. He's hardly on his own there. Still, when it comes to money and politics the overt optics of being left and well off are stark. Anyone with extra money they think the government should be taking in taxes should already be giving it away....it's hardly as though that arrangement is hard to make.....But of course, it's so much easier to virtue signal it. I think accusing me of being a little binary is a fair accusation.....But what can I say, I like my socialists to live their principles and that just means I'm critical of champagne socialism.
I get that, but I think my definition of champagne socialism is different to yours. Which is probably to be expected. I agree re. the taxes point of view – but that doesn't mean they should be giving it all away, just the amount they think others should be relative to their circumstance. Which makes sense to me. The problem for me is also fear mongering and ignorance around true, puritanical socialism vs. labours current version. They're not the same thing. And people like the 80k guy on news night who thinks he's on an average wage don't do much to help my general assumptions around what people assume 2019 'socialism' to be. The truth is it's a hybrid not an all in scenario, so for me some of the criticism and soundbites aren't grounded in reality – they're just knee jerk reactions based on all in socialism, which is not what is being sold in. No way you'd get away with full on socialism now – they'd be voted out at the next election.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Perhaps, but it's way after the fact. The only religious individuals I have any respect for are monks, or those who dedicate their entire lives to whatever their religion is, in its purest sense. They're misguided, but at least they're committed. To come full circle, I have zero time for champagne religion. If you're going to waste your life, do it properly. They are even worse! It appears that we are both religious fundamentalists - in the old sense of the term.....If you are going to believe in the fairy tales then do it properly....or don't bother......Perhaps you're even more stanch on that than me....I kind of have time for genuine Catholics....or even the serious Protestants like Quakers and even those filthy casuals....the Methodists. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 5.09pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
When my dad was on strike alongside the 3 day week in the 70s The 70s. I stopped reading after that.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
They are even worse! It appears that we are both religious fundamentalists - in the old sense of the term.....If you are going to believe in the fairy tales then do it properly....or don't bother......Perhaps you're even more stanch on that than me....I kind of have time for genuine Catholics....or even the serious Protestants like Quakers and even those filthy casuals....the Methodists. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 5.09pm) Mainly agree. Religion has been changed and adapted so much for no other purpose than power and convenience I find it amazing people still a) follow the modern incarnations of it and b) do so thinking they're following it correctly. Newsflash, you're not. Especially if you are CoE. Well done. Your version was created by a fat man with gout to get his way 1532 years after the fact. It's not correct. Waste of life I have more respect for Pagans than anyone who follows any branch of christianity.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
I get that, but I think my definition of champagne socialism is different to yours. Which is probably to be expected. I agree re. the taxes point of view – but that doesn't mean they should be giving it all away, just the amount they think others should be relative to their circumstance. Which makes sense to me. The problem for me is also fear mongering and ignorance around true, puritanical socialism vs. labours current version. They're not the same thing. And people like the 80k guy on news night who thinks he's on an average wage don't do much to help my general assumptions around what people assume 2019 'socialism' to be. The truth is it's a hybrid not an all in scenario, so for me some of the criticism and soundbites aren't grounded in reality – they're just knee jerk reactions based on all in socialism, which is not what is being sold in. No way you'd get away with full on socialism now – they'd be voted out at the next election. Your money, your choice....the government taxes you what if thinks it can best get away with as an average for your income...but the individual can always support those causes that bother them.....No one ever needs to have money they don't need if they make a point of empathic politics. I'd say we probably agree more on this than don't. You must understand that I have to keep giving Dan a reason to 'hate click' onto the site. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 5.48pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That's not what I said. I was referring to money and consistency.....Yeah, sure they sometimes point at actual unfairness, while directly contributing to it. Look, it's similar to the tax man who wants to join Jesus.....it's essentially the 'cake and eat it' brigade....The 'I can be rich, but I'm one of you or with you'. 'Don't be fooled by the rocks that I got. What a complete load of self deluded BS. A well off socialist is a hypocrite......give the extra away or admit that your support for that politics is a form of self aggrandisement.....a self image of yourself as moral while you make excuses for driving two cars and nice holidays while supporting 'equality'.
Never thought I’d be discussing JLO lyrics in a political exchange but here we go I interpret the lyrics more of a cultural belonging than any sort of monetary claim - she’s not claiming to be a socialist is she, just saying that despite her success, she still feels her home is ‘the block’ - I think a lot of people can relate to that, myself included. I also think you conflate having left-leaning tendencies with being a full blown socialist far too readily - my own experience is that there is only a relatively small minority of people who believe in pure socialism, and most just feel the scale has shifted too far one way.
|
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Mainly agree. Religion has been changed and adapted so much for no other purpose than power and convenience I find it amazing people still a) follow the modern incarnations of it and b) do so thinking they're following it correctly. Newsflash, you're not. Especially if you are CoE. Well done. Your version was created by a fat man with gout to get his way 1532 years after the fact. It's not correct. Waste of life I have more respect for Pagans than anyone who follows any branch of christianity. Agreed. Paganism makes more sense.....though ultimately you just end up finding yourself shagging some neurotic women who doesn't wash regularly enough.....some tosh about being one with nature or other. Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Dec 2019 5.31pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Never thought I’d be discussing JLO lyrics in a political exchange but here we go I interpret the lyrics more of a cultural belonging than any sort of monetary claim - she’s not claiming to be a socialist is she, just saying that despite her success, she still feels her home is ‘the block’ - I think a lot of people can relate to that, myself included. I'd kinda agree with that.....though I don't think you can really divorce the money from it. But I accept the broad premise....I used it more for illustration. Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
I also think you conflate having left-leaning tendencies with being a full blown socialist far too readily - my own experience is that there is only a relatively small minority of people who believe in pure socialism, and most just feel the scale has shifted too far one way. I think it undermines the central 'equality' message of socialism. It's not one I agree with but I can respect the intent nevertheless. I have an aversion to the 'cake and eat it' brigade. The 'I have a nice life but I'm a socialist'. Well, anyone can make their fiscals equal to the national average if they really wanted to. Socialism-lite.....The 'third way'....Blairism....Mandelsonism.....well ok, I'm essentially having a go at neo liberalism on the left as an inherent ideological tension. But I recognise your critique as having some validity....this criticism can obviously go too far and if you think I've stretched it then fair enough.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's a huge insult to the late David Frost who was a heavyweight commentator whilst Schofield's target market seems to be housewives. The interesting thing about the Andrew Neil non interview with Boris Johnson is that I doubt whether anyone really cares apart from the BBC of course A lot of people care, including me. I wanted to see him grilled and his hypocrisy exposed by a serious political journalist. That his "advisers" have stopped it happening only confirms what I believe. That Johnson is a complete fake. An opportunist who will say anything so long as it keeps him in the job he has craved. Andrew Neil would have eviscerated him and might have done enough to save us all. No-one has yet really torn him apart on his refusal to publish the intelligence committee report on Russian interference or on the weaknesses we have in trying to negotiate a trade deal with the USA that won't see huge increases in drug costs for the NHS. Brexit will not gain us independence. It will leave us isolated and unprotected by our closest allies in Europe. Johnson knows this and is sacrificing the future of our children for his own selfishness. These days are truly the nadir of British politics in my lifetime. I wonder how long it will take before we recover and whether I will live to see it. My children and grand children are already blaming my generation for this disaster so you can all expect a backlash when they do get their hands on the wheel of state again and that is totally certain to happen.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.